FRONTLINE: Gentle sounds, distant roar: a watershed year for journalism as research

The Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification (ANZSRC) 2020 decision on disciplinary categories has profound implications for journalism as a research discipline. Journalism Practice and Professional Writing retain their six-digit Fields of Research (FoR) code within the Creative...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Chris Nash
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Asia Pacific Network 2020
Materias:	ANZSRC Australia ARC communication fields of research FoR codes Communication. Mass media P87-96 Journalism. The periodical press, etc. PN4699-5650
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/c57b8335f189418ca8c08ec368193252
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:c57b8335f189418ca8c08ec368193252
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:c57b8335f189418ca8c08ec3681932522021-12-02T14:33:59ZFRONTLINE: Gentle sounds, distant roar: a watershed year for journalism as research10.24135/pjr.v26i2.11471023-94992324-2035https://doaj.org/article/c57b8335f189418ca8c08ec3681932522020-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/1147https://doaj.org/toc/1023-9499https://doaj.org/toc/2324-2035 The Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification (ANZSRC) 2020 decision on disciplinary categories has profound implications for journalism as a research discipline. Journalism Practice and Professional Writing retain their six-digit Fields of Research (FoR) code within the Creative Arts and Writing Division, a new six-digit FoR of Journalism Studies has been created in the Division of Language, Communication and Culture, and three new FoR codes of Literature, Journalism and Professional Writing have been created for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander, Māori and Pacific Peoples within the new Indigenous Studies Division. This categorisation both confirms Journalism as a sovereign and independent discipline distinct from Communication and Media Studies, which has been in bitter contention for more than two decades. The ANZSRC confirmed its 2008 policy that the sole and definitive criterion for categorisation was methodology. This article explores the welcome ramifications of this decision for Journalism within Australasian university-based journalism and charts some of the issues ahead for journalism academics as they embark on the long overdue and fraught path to disciplinary self-recognition as an equal among the humanities and social sciences. Chris NashAsia Pacific NetworkarticleANZSRCAustraliaARCcommunicationfields of researchFoR codesCommunication. Mass mediaP87-96Journalism. The periodical press, etc.PN4699-5650ENPacific Journalism Review, Vol 26, Iss 2 (2020)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	ANZSRC Australia ARC communication fields of research FoR codes Communication. Mass media P87-96 Journalism. The periodical press, etc. PN4699-5650
spellingShingle	ANZSRC Australia ARC communication fields of research FoR codes Communication. Mass media P87-96 Journalism. The periodical press, etc. PN4699-5650 Chris Nash FRONTLINE: Gentle sounds, distant roar: a watershed year for journalism as research
description	The Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification (ANZSRC) 2020 decision on disciplinary categories has profound implications for journalism as a research discipline. Journalism Practice and Professional Writing retain their six-digit Fields of Research (FoR) code within the Creative Arts and Writing Division, a new six-digit FoR of Journalism Studies has been created in the Division of Language, Communication and Culture, and three new FoR codes of Literature, Journalism and Professional Writing have been created for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander, Māori and Pacific Peoples within the new Indigenous Studies Division. This categorisation both confirms Journalism as a sovereign and independent discipline distinct from Communication and Media Studies, which has been in bitter contention for more than two decades. The ANZSRC confirmed its 2008 policy that the sole and definitive criterion for categorisation was methodology. This article explores the welcome ramifications of this decision for Journalism within Australasian university-based journalism and charts some of the issues ahead for journalism academics as they embark on the long overdue and fraught path to disciplinary self-recognition as an equal among the humanities and social sciences.
format	article
author	Chris Nash
author_facet	Chris Nash
author_sort	Chris Nash
title	FRONTLINE: Gentle sounds, distant roar: a watershed year for journalism as research
title_short	FRONTLINE: Gentle sounds, distant roar: a watershed year for journalism as research
title_full	FRONTLINE: Gentle sounds, distant roar: a watershed year for journalism as research
title_fullStr	FRONTLINE: Gentle sounds, distant roar: a watershed year for journalism as research
title_full_unstemmed	FRONTLINE: Gentle sounds, distant roar: a watershed year for journalism as research
title_sort	frontline: gentle sounds, distant roar: a watershed year for journalism as research
publisher	Asia Pacific Network
publishDate	2020
url	https://doaj.org/article/c57b8335f189418ca8c08ec368193252
work_keys_str_mv	AT chrisnash frontlinegentlesoundsdistantroarawatershedyearforjournalismasresearch
_version_	1718391156726824960

FRONTLINE: Gentle sounds, distant roar: a watershed year for journalism as research

Ejemplares similares