Comment légitimer l'accession au statut d'expert pour limiter les controverses : étude de cas en biodiversité

Environment in general, and even more so Wildlife management, are fields in which the need and the claim for expertise are both very strong and distributed. This is partly due to the intricate issues resulting from various scientific disciplines. The temptation to seek in science for an objective gu...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Daniel Marc, Frédéric Blanc
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	FR
Publicado:	Éditions en environnement VertigO 2013
Materias:	expertise biodiversity legitimacy French national agency for wildlife natural spaces conservatories environment Environmental sciences GE1-350
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/c583fb3f239e4bdf8878d60f7b3819fb
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:c583fb3f239e4bdf8878d60f7b3819fb
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:c583fb3f239e4bdf8878d60f7b3819fb2021-12-02T10:00:21ZComment légitimer l'accession au statut d'expert pour limiter les controverses : étude de cas en biodiversité1492-844210.4000/vertigo.14033https://doaj.org/article/c583fb3f239e4bdf8878d60f7b3819fb2013-10-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/14033https://doaj.org/toc/1492-8442Environment in general, and even more so Wildlife management, are fields in which the need and the claim for expertise are both very strong and distributed. This is partly due to the intricate issues resulting from various scientific disciplines. The temptation to seek in science for an objective guaranty for the rightfulness of a public policy thus significant. This is also a field of high interest of the population and on which it is fairly easy to have an opinion. There are therefore ideal conditions for much controversy on the subject. The stumbling blocks are varied: from the definition of the expert, of the scientist, of the user, of the knowledgeable or the public to the legitimacy of the experts themselves. We show in this case study, the long-term strategies developed by two environmental actors in France, the « Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage » and the « Conservatoires d’Espaces Naturels », to gain a greater legitimacy. The first disposes of a rational legal legitimacy and has wished to complete by developing a scientific expertise. The second, strong of their local acceptation and their rigorous practice, have seeked to legitimate their action through law. The two now seem to have succeeded. Their investment seems to have been productive from the point of view of their intrinsic legitimacy. This investment may be more subtle in view to the real repercussions of this legitimacy. Much controversy remains regardless of the expert’s legitimacy. The efficiency of the investments must thus be kept in perspective. However, it results in a professionalization of expert status, clearer and better supported, enabling to think that this proliferation of actors, source of competition is a chance of the general interest.Daniel MarcFrédéric BlancÉditions en environnement VertigOarticleexpertisebiodiversitylegitimacyFrench national agency for wildlifenatural spaces conservatoriesenvironmentEnvironmental sciencesGE1-350FRVertigO, Vol 13, Iss 2 (2013)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	FR
topic	expertise biodiversity legitimacy French national agency for wildlife natural spaces conservatories environment Environmental sciences GE1-350
spellingShingle	expertise biodiversity legitimacy French national agency for wildlife natural spaces conservatories environment Environmental sciences GE1-350 Daniel Marc Frédéric Blanc Comment légitimer l'accession au statut d'expert pour limiter les controverses : étude de cas en biodiversité
description	Environment in general, and even more so Wildlife management, are fields in which the need and the claim for expertise are both very strong and distributed. This is partly due to the intricate issues resulting from various scientific disciplines. The temptation to seek in science for an objective guaranty for the rightfulness of a public policy thus significant. This is also a field of high interest of the population and on which it is fairly easy to have an opinion. There are therefore ideal conditions for much controversy on the subject. The stumbling blocks are varied: from the definition of the expert, of the scientist, of the user, of the knowledgeable or the public to the legitimacy of the experts themselves. We show in this case study, the long-term strategies developed by two environmental actors in France, the « Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage » and the « Conservatoires d’Espaces Naturels », to gain a greater legitimacy. The first disposes of a rational legal legitimacy and has wished to complete by developing a scientific expertise. The second, strong of their local acceptation and their rigorous practice, have seeked to legitimate their action through law. The two now seem to have succeeded. Their investment seems to have been productive from the point of view of their intrinsic legitimacy. This investment may be more subtle in view to the real repercussions of this legitimacy. Much controversy remains regardless of the expert’s legitimacy. The efficiency of the investments must thus be kept in perspective. However, it results in a professionalization of expert status, clearer and better supported, enabling to think that this proliferation of actors, source of competition is a chance of the general interest.
format	article
author	Daniel Marc Frédéric Blanc
author_facet	Daniel Marc Frédéric Blanc
author_sort	Daniel Marc
title	Comment légitimer l'accession au statut d'expert pour limiter les controverses : étude de cas en biodiversité
title_short	Comment légitimer l'accession au statut d'expert pour limiter les controverses : étude de cas en biodiversité
title_full	Comment légitimer l'accession au statut d'expert pour limiter les controverses : étude de cas en biodiversité
title_fullStr	Comment légitimer l'accession au statut d'expert pour limiter les controverses : étude de cas en biodiversité
title_full_unstemmed	Comment légitimer l'accession au statut d'expert pour limiter les controverses : étude de cas en biodiversité
title_sort	comment légitimer l'accession au statut d'expert pour limiter les controverses : étude de cas en biodiversité
publisher	Éditions en environnement VertigO
publishDate	2013
url	https://doaj.org/article/c583fb3f239e4bdf8878d60f7b3819fb
work_keys_str_mv	AT danielmarc commentlegitimerlaccessionaustatutdexpertpourlimiterlescontroversesetudedecasenbiodiversite AT fredericblanc commentlegitimerlaccessionaustatutdexpertpourlimiterlescontroversesetudedecasenbiodiversite
_version_	1718397826538405888

Comment légitimer l'accession au statut d'expert pour limiter les controverses : étude de cas en biodiversité

Ejemplares similares