Does the video head impulse test replace caloric testing in the assessment of patients with chronic dizziness? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction: Caloric testing is the most frequently used test to assess peripheral vestibular function since the beginning of the 20th century. However, the video head impulse test, vHIT, has gained prominence in the field of neurotology, as it is a faster examination, easier to perform and less un...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maria Gabriela Bonilha Vallim, Guilherme Paiva Gabriel, Raquel Mezzalira, Guita Stoler, Carlos Takahiro Chone
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c58650a2af324e569a9da28057a838cf
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c58650a2af324e569a9da28057a838cf
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c58650a2af324e569a9da28057a838cf2021-11-06T04:24:15ZDoes the video head impulse test replace caloric testing in the assessment of patients with chronic dizziness? A systematic review and meta-analysis1808-869410.1016/j.bjorl.2021.01.002https://doaj.org/article/c58650a2af324e569a9da28057a838cf2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1808869421000082https://doaj.org/toc/1808-8694Introduction: Caloric testing is the most frequently used test to assess peripheral vestibular function since the beginning of the 20th century. However, the video head impulse test, vHIT, has gained prominence in the field of neurotology, as it is a faster examination, easier to perform and less uncomfortable for the patient. Objective: To compare, through systematic review and meta-analysis, the proportion of altered cases between vHIT tests and caloric testing in patients with chronic dizziness, in addition to assessing the sensitivity and specificity of vHIT, with caloric testing as the gold standard. Methods: The literature search was carried out in the PubMed, Scopus, BVS-Bireme, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane and ProQuest indexed databases, with no restrictions regarding the publication period. All articles that contained the results of the two tests were included in the evaluation of patients with dizziness. Two researchers independently conducted data selection and extraction from the studies, strictly following the inclusion and exclusion criteria defined in the research protocol. In case of disagreement during the selection, a discussion was carried out with a third evaluator. Results: Eleven of the 1293 initial articles met the eligibility criteria and were analyzed. 2670 patients were evaluated, of which 1112 (41.6%) were males and 1558 (58.4%) females, with a mean age of 51.6 years. The proportion of altered results in the vHIT was 21% (95%CI 9% –33%), and 55% in the caloric testing (95%CI 43% –67%). Conclusion: The vHIT does not substitute for caloric testing. The tests are complementary in assessing the patient with dizziness, as they describe the tonotopy of the ampullary crest at different frequency ranges of stimulation. In chronic cases, the vHIT has a low sensitivity and high diagnostic specificity in comparison to caloric testing.Maria Gabriela Bonilha VallimGuilherme Paiva GabrielRaquel MezzaliraGuita StolerCarlos Takahiro ChoneElsevierarticleCaloric testVideo head impulse testVestibulo-ocular reflex, vertigoOtorhinolaryngologyRF1-547ENBrazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, Vol 87, Iss 6, Pp 733-741 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Caloric test
Video head impulse test
Vestibulo-ocular reflex, vertigo
Otorhinolaryngology
RF1-547
spellingShingle Caloric test
Video head impulse test
Vestibulo-ocular reflex, vertigo
Otorhinolaryngology
RF1-547
Maria Gabriela Bonilha Vallim
Guilherme Paiva Gabriel
Raquel Mezzalira
Guita Stoler
Carlos Takahiro Chone
Does the video head impulse test replace caloric testing in the assessment of patients with chronic dizziness? A systematic review and meta-analysis
description Introduction: Caloric testing is the most frequently used test to assess peripheral vestibular function since the beginning of the 20th century. However, the video head impulse test, vHIT, has gained prominence in the field of neurotology, as it is a faster examination, easier to perform and less uncomfortable for the patient. Objective: To compare, through systematic review and meta-analysis, the proportion of altered cases between vHIT tests and caloric testing in patients with chronic dizziness, in addition to assessing the sensitivity and specificity of vHIT, with caloric testing as the gold standard. Methods: The literature search was carried out in the PubMed, Scopus, BVS-Bireme, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane and ProQuest indexed databases, with no restrictions regarding the publication period. All articles that contained the results of the two tests were included in the evaluation of patients with dizziness. Two researchers independently conducted data selection and extraction from the studies, strictly following the inclusion and exclusion criteria defined in the research protocol. In case of disagreement during the selection, a discussion was carried out with a third evaluator. Results: Eleven of the 1293 initial articles met the eligibility criteria and were analyzed. 2670 patients were evaluated, of which 1112 (41.6%) were males and 1558 (58.4%) females, with a mean age of 51.6 years. The proportion of altered results in the vHIT was 21% (95%CI 9% –33%), and 55% in the caloric testing (95%CI 43% –67%). Conclusion: The vHIT does not substitute for caloric testing. The tests are complementary in assessing the patient with dizziness, as they describe the tonotopy of the ampullary crest at different frequency ranges of stimulation. In chronic cases, the vHIT has a low sensitivity and high diagnostic specificity in comparison to caloric testing.
format article
author Maria Gabriela Bonilha Vallim
Guilherme Paiva Gabriel
Raquel Mezzalira
Guita Stoler
Carlos Takahiro Chone
author_facet Maria Gabriela Bonilha Vallim
Guilherme Paiva Gabriel
Raquel Mezzalira
Guita Stoler
Carlos Takahiro Chone
author_sort Maria Gabriela Bonilha Vallim
title Does the video head impulse test replace caloric testing in the assessment of patients with chronic dizziness? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Does the video head impulse test replace caloric testing in the assessment of patients with chronic dizziness? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Does the video head impulse test replace caloric testing in the assessment of patients with chronic dizziness? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Does the video head impulse test replace caloric testing in the assessment of patients with chronic dizziness? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Does the video head impulse test replace caloric testing in the assessment of patients with chronic dizziness? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort does the video head impulse test replace caloric testing in the assessment of patients with chronic dizziness? a systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/c58650a2af324e569a9da28057a838cf
work_keys_str_mv AT mariagabrielabonilhavallim doesthevideoheadimpulsetestreplacecalorictestingintheassessmentofpatientswithchronicdizzinessasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT guilhermepaivagabriel doesthevideoheadimpulsetestreplacecalorictestingintheassessmentofpatientswithchronicdizzinessasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT raquelmezzalira doesthevideoheadimpulsetestreplacecalorictestingintheassessmentofpatientswithchronicdizzinessasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT guitastoler doesthevideoheadimpulsetestreplacecalorictestingintheassessmentofpatientswithchronicdizzinessasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT carlostakahirochone doesthevideoheadimpulsetestreplacecalorictestingintheassessmentofpatientswithchronicdizzinessasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1718443943154155520