Effect of Funding Source on “Spin” in Studies of Ocriplasmin Therapy for Vitreomacular Traction and Macular Hole

Sasha Hubschman, 1 Michael J Venincasa, 1 Ajay E Kuriyan, 2 Jayanth Sridhar 1 1Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA; 2Department of Ophthalmology, Flaum Eye Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Roches...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hubschman S, Venincasa MJ, Kuriyan AE, Sridhar J
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c588af2ed6e44b10b08a9c7c7de94ede
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c588af2ed6e44b10b08a9c7c7de94ede
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c588af2ed6e44b10b08a9c7c7de94ede2021-12-02T06:24:46ZEffect of Funding Source on “Spin” in Studies of Ocriplasmin Therapy for Vitreomacular Traction and Macular Hole1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/c588af2ed6e44b10b08a9c7c7de94ede2020-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/effect-of-funding-source-on-spin-in-studies-of-ocriplasmin-therapy-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Sasha Hubschman, 1 Michael J Venincasa, 1 Ajay E Kuriyan, 2 Jayanth Sridhar 1 1Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA; 2Department of Ophthalmology, Flaum Eye Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USACorrespondence: Jayanth SridharBascom Palmer Eye Institute, 900 NW 17 th Street, Miami, FL 33136, USATel +1305-326-6124Fax +1305-326-6417Email jsridhar1@med.miami.eduPurpose: To examine the relationship between industry funding and “spin” in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses investigating use of ocriplasmin for patients with vitreomacular traction (VMT) and macular hole (MH).Methods: In this study, we examined all PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE RCTs and meta-analyses published in journals with impact factor ≥ 2 investigating effectiveness of ocriplasmin use for VMT and MH. The main outcome measure was correspondence between the studies’ main statistical outcome and their abstract conclusion wording. Each article was reviewed by three independent observers and was evaluated for source of funding, industry co-authorship, study methodology, statistical significance of main outcome measure, correspondence between results of main outcome measure and abstract conclusion, and journal impact factor. Funding was determined by public disclosure. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus.Results: Twelve studies met inclusion criteria, of which 11 were industry funded and 1 was non-industry funded; 11 (91.67%) showed correspondence between outcome and abstract conclusion, without difference between industry-funded and non-industry funded publications or between publications in journals with high impact factor (≥ 3) versus low impact factor (≥ 2 and < 3).Conclusion: In RCTs and meta-analyses of ocriplasmin for VMT and MH, our results suggest that neither industry funding nor journal impact factor affected the rate of “spin” in study conclusions. This study helps physicians understand what challenges they face when learning about a newer, less-established drug.Keywords: ocriplasmin, microplasmin, vitreolysis, vitreomacular traction, macular hole, spinHubschman SVenincasa MJKuriyan AESridhar JDove Medical Pressarticleocriplasminmicroplasminvitreolysisvitreomacular tractionmacular holespin.OphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol Volume 14, Pp 81-88 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic ocriplasmin
microplasmin
vitreolysis
vitreomacular traction
macular hole
spin.
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle ocriplasmin
microplasmin
vitreolysis
vitreomacular traction
macular hole
spin.
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Hubschman S
Venincasa MJ
Kuriyan AE
Sridhar J
Effect of Funding Source on “Spin” in Studies of Ocriplasmin Therapy for Vitreomacular Traction and Macular Hole
description Sasha Hubschman, 1 Michael J Venincasa, 1 Ajay E Kuriyan, 2 Jayanth Sridhar 1 1Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA; 2Department of Ophthalmology, Flaum Eye Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USACorrespondence: Jayanth SridharBascom Palmer Eye Institute, 900 NW 17 th Street, Miami, FL 33136, USATel +1305-326-6124Fax +1305-326-6417Email jsridhar1@med.miami.eduPurpose: To examine the relationship between industry funding and “spin” in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses investigating use of ocriplasmin for patients with vitreomacular traction (VMT) and macular hole (MH).Methods: In this study, we examined all PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE RCTs and meta-analyses published in journals with impact factor ≥ 2 investigating effectiveness of ocriplasmin use for VMT and MH. The main outcome measure was correspondence between the studies’ main statistical outcome and their abstract conclusion wording. Each article was reviewed by three independent observers and was evaluated for source of funding, industry co-authorship, study methodology, statistical significance of main outcome measure, correspondence between results of main outcome measure and abstract conclusion, and journal impact factor. Funding was determined by public disclosure. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus.Results: Twelve studies met inclusion criteria, of which 11 were industry funded and 1 was non-industry funded; 11 (91.67%) showed correspondence between outcome and abstract conclusion, without difference between industry-funded and non-industry funded publications or between publications in journals with high impact factor (≥ 3) versus low impact factor (≥ 2 and < 3).Conclusion: In RCTs and meta-analyses of ocriplasmin for VMT and MH, our results suggest that neither industry funding nor journal impact factor affected the rate of “spin” in study conclusions. This study helps physicians understand what challenges they face when learning about a newer, less-established drug.Keywords: ocriplasmin, microplasmin, vitreolysis, vitreomacular traction, macular hole, spin
format article
author Hubschman S
Venincasa MJ
Kuriyan AE
Sridhar J
author_facet Hubschman S
Venincasa MJ
Kuriyan AE
Sridhar J
author_sort Hubschman S
title Effect of Funding Source on “Spin” in Studies of Ocriplasmin Therapy for Vitreomacular Traction and Macular Hole
title_short Effect of Funding Source on “Spin” in Studies of Ocriplasmin Therapy for Vitreomacular Traction and Macular Hole
title_full Effect of Funding Source on “Spin” in Studies of Ocriplasmin Therapy for Vitreomacular Traction and Macular Hole
title_fullStr Effect of Funding Source on “Spin” in Studies of Ocriplasmin Therapy for Vitreomacular Traction and Macular Hole
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Funding Source on “Spin” in Studies of Ocriplasmin Therapy for Vitreomacular Traction and Macular Hole
title_sort effect of funding source on “spin” in studies of ocriplasmin therapy for vitreomacular traction and macular hole
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/c588af2ed6e44b10b08a9c7c7de94ede
work_keys_str_mv AT hubschmans effectoffundingsourceonldquospinrdquoinstudiesofocriplasmintherapyforvitreomaculartractionandmacularhole
AT venincasamj effectoffundingsourceonldquospinrdquoinstudiesofocriplasmintherapyforvitreomaculartractionandmacularhole
AT kuriyanae effectoffundingsourceonldquospinrdquoinstudiesofocriplasmintherapyforvitreomaculartractionandmacularhole
AT sridharj effectoffundingsourceonldquospinrdquoinstudiesofocriplasmintherapyforvitreomaculartractionandmacularhole
_version_ 1718399961916243968