Differences between Mycobacterium chimaera and tuberculosis Using Ocular Multimodal Imaging: A Systematic Review

Due to their non-specific diagnostic patterns of ocular infection, differential diagnosis between Mycobacterium (M.) chimaera and tuberculosis can be challenging. In both disorders, ocular manifestation can be the first sign...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Sandrine Anne Zweifel, Nastasia Foa, Maximilian Robert Justus Wiest, Adriano Carnevali, Katarzyna Zaluska-Ogryzek, Robert Rejdak, Mario Damiano Toro
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	MDPI AG 2021
Materias:	mycobacterium multifocal choroiditis fundus photography biomicroscopy multimodal imaging fundus fluorescein angiography Medicine R
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/c59431994bbb4edeb1527a0e8a5162a6
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:c59431994bbb4edeb1527a0e8a5162a6
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:c59431994bbb4edeb1527a0e8a5162a62021-11-11T17:32:29ZDifferences between <i>Mycobacterium chimaera</i> and <i>tuberculosis</i> Using Ocular Multimodal Imaging: A Systematic Review10.3390/jcm102148802077-0383https://doaj.org/article/c59431994bbb4edeb1527a0e8a5162a62021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/21/4880https://doaj.org/toc/2077-0383Due to their non-specific diagnostic patterns of ocular infection, differential diagnosis between <i>Mycobacterium</i> (<i>M.</i>) <i>chimaera</i> and <i>tuberculosis</i> can be challenging. In both disorders, ocular manifestation can be the first sign of a systemic infection, and a delayed diagnosis might reduce the response to treatment leading to negative outcomes. Thus, it becomes imperative to distinguish chorioretinal lesions associated with <i>M. chimaera</i>, from lesions due to <i>M. tuberculosis</i> and other infectious disorders. To date, multimodal non-invasive imaging modalities that include ultra-wide field fundus photography, fluorescein and indocyanine green angiography, optical coherence tomography and optical coherence tomography angiography, facilitate in vivo examination of retinal and choroidal tissues, enabling early diagnosis, monitoring treatment response, and relapse detection. This approach is crucial to differentiate between active and inactive ocular disease, and guides clinicians in their decisional-tree during the patients’ follow-up. In this review, we summarized and compared the available literature on multimodal imaging data of <i>M. chimaera</i> infection and tuberculosis, emphasizing similarities and differences in imaging patterns between these two entities and highlighting the relevance of multimodal imaging in the management of the infections.Sandrine Anne ZweifelNastasia FoaMaximilian Robert Justus WiestAdriano CarnevaliKatarzyna Zaluska-OgryzekRobert RejdakMario Damiano ToroMDPI AGarticlemycobacteriummultifocal choroiditisfundus photographybiomicroscopymultimodal imagingfundus fluorescein angiographyMedicineRENJournal of Clinical Medicine, Vol 10, Iss 4880, p 4880 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	mycobacterium multifocal choroiditis fundus photography biomicroscopy multimodal imaging fundus fluorescein angiography Medicine R
spellingShingle	mycobacterium multifocal choroiditis fundus photography biomicroscopy multimodal imaging fundus fluorescein angiography Medicine R Sandrine Anne Zweifel Nastasia Foa Maximilian Robert Justus Wiest Adriano Carnevali Katarzyna Zaluska-Ogryzek Robert Rejdak Mario Damiano Toro Differences between <i>Mycobacterium chimaera</i> and <i>tuberculosis</i> Using Ocular Multimodal Imaging: A Systematic Review
description	Due to their non-specific diagnostic patterns of ocular infection, differential diagnosis between <i>Mycobacterium</i> (<i>M.</i>) <i>chimaera</i> and <i>tuberculosis</i> can be challenging. In both disorders, ocular manifestation can be the first sign of a systemic infection, and a delayed diagnosis might reduce the response to treatment leading to negative outcomes. Thus, it becomes imperative to distinguish chorioretinal lesions associated with <i>M. chimaera</i>, from lesions due to <i>M. tuberculosis</i> and other infectious disorders. To date, multimodal non-invasive imaging modalities that include ultra-wide field fundus photography, fluorescein and indocyanine green angiography, optical coherence tomography and optical coherence tomography angiography, facilitate in vivo examination of retinal and choroidal tissues, enabling early diagnosis, monitoring treatment response, and relapse detection. This approach is crucial to differentiate between active and inactive ocular disease, and guides clinicians in their decisional-tree during the patients’ follow-up. In this review, we summarized and compared the available literature on multimodal imaging data of <i>M. chimaera</i> infection and tuberculosis, emphasizing similarities and differences in imaging patterns between these two entities and highlighting the relevance of multimodal imaging in the management of the infections.
format	article
author	Sandrine Anne Zweifel Nastasia Foa Maximilian Robert Justus Wiest Adriano Carnevali Katarzyna Zaluska-Ogryzek Robert Rejdak Mario Damiano Toro
author_facet	Sandrine Anne Zweifel Nastasia Foa Maximilian Robert Justus Wiest Adriano Carnevali Katarzyna Zaluska-Ogryzek Robert Rejdak Mario Damiano Toro
author_sort	Sandrine Anne Zweifel
title	Differences between <i>Mycobacterium chimaera</i> and <i>tuberculosis</i> Using Ocular Multimodal Imaging: A Systematic Review
title_short	Differences between <i>Mycobacterium chimaera</i> and <i>tuberculosis</i> Using Ocular Multimodal Imaging: A Systematic Review
title_full	Differences between <i>Mycobacterium chimaera</i> and <i>tuberculosis</i> Using Ocular Multimodal Imaging: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr	Differences between <i>Mycobacterium chimaera</i> and <i>tuberculosis</i> Using Ocular Multimodal Imaging: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed	Differences between <i>Mycobacterium chimaera</i> and <i>tuberculosis</i> Using Ocular Multimodal Imaging: A Systematic Review
title_sort	differences between <i>mycobacterium chimaera</i> and <i>tuberculosis</i> using ocular multimodal imaging: a systematic review
publisher	MDPI AG
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/c59431994bbb4edeb1527a0e8a5162a6
work_keys_str_mv	AT sandrineannezweifel differencesbetweenimycobacteriumchimaeraiandituberculosisiusingocularmultimodalimagingasystematicreview AT nastasiafoa differencesbetweenimycobacteriumchimaeraiandituberculosisiusingocularmultimodalimagingasystematicreview AT maximilianrobertjustuswiest differencesbetweenimycobacteriumchimaeraiandituberculosisiusingocularmultimodalimagingasystematicreview AT adrianocarnevali differencesbetweenimycobacteriumchimaeraiandituberculosisiusingocularmultimodalimagingasystematicreview AT katarzynazaluskaogryzek differencesbetweenimycobacteriumchimaeraiandituberculosisiusingocularmultimodalimagingasystematicreview AT robertrejdak differencesbetweenimycobacteriumchimaeraiandituberculosisiusingocularmultimodalimagingasystematicreview AT mariodamianotoro differencesbetweenimycobacteriumchimaeraiandituberculosisiusingocularmultimodalimagingasystematicreview
_version_	1718432087296442368

Differences between <i>Mycobacterium chimaera</i> and <i>tuberculosis</i> Using Ocular Multimodal Imaging: A Systematic Review

Ejemplares similares