An experimental comparative study between polypropylene and laminated lower limb prosthetic socket

Most researchers concentrate their studies on the design, stress and pressure distributions of the prosthetic socket. A little attention is considered for the stiffness of the various materials of the prosthetic sockets. Prosthetic laminated sockets in Iraq are costly to be manufactured while polypr...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: .Haider F. Neama, M.Sc, Dr. Samira K. Radhi, Muhsin J. Jweeg
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Al-Khwarizmi College of Engineering – University of Baghdad 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c59486814d32489ba8241251c4fccdb1
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c59486814d32489ba8241251c4fccdb1
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c59486814d32489ba8241251c4fccdb12021-12-02T08:14:20ZAn experimental comparative study between polypropylene and laminated lower limb prosthetic socket1818-1171https://doaj.org/article/c59486814d32489ba8241251c4fccdb12007-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.iasj.net/iasj?func=fulltext&aId=2247https://doaj.org/toc/1818-1171Most researchers concentrate their studies on the design, stress and pressure distributions of the prosthetic socket. A little attention is considered for the stiffness of the various materials of the prosthetic sockets. Prosthetic laminated sockets in Iraq are costly to be manufactured while polypropylene socket is relatively cheap in comparing with the laminates. Experimental study is conducted to compare the stiffness of five prosthetic sockets made of different materials. Compression, three point flexural and tensile tests are implemented by the Testometric machine. The laminate sockets give better results in compression than polypropylene. Polypropylene gives good results in bending compared with the laminate sockets. When the socket loads are mainly in compression i.e. the low activity level patients, it seems that any of the tested sockets could be used, however, when the load will be not only in compression but in flexion as well i.e. high activity patients, socket No.1 and 5 could be used.Haider F. Neama, M.ScDr. Samira K. RadhiMuhsin J. JweegAl-Khwarizmi College of Engineering – University of BaghdadarticleProstheticSocketLaminatePolypropylene and StiffnessChemical engineeringTP155-156Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040ENAl-Khawarizmi Engineering Journal, Vol 3, Iss 1, Pp 40-47 (2007)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Prosthetic
Socket
Laminate
Polypropylene and Stiffness
Chemical engineering
TP155-156
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
spellingShingle Prosthetic
Socket
Laminate
Polypropylene and Stiffness
Chemical engineering
TP155-156
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
.Haider F. Neama, M.Sc
Dr. Samira K. Radhi
Muhsin J. Jweeg
An experimental comparative study between polypropylene and laminated lower limb prosthetic socket
description Most researchers concentrate their studies on the design, stress and pressure distributions of the prosthetic socket. A little attention is considered for the stiffness of the various materials of the prosthetic sockets. Prosthetic laminated sockets in Iraq are costly to be manufactured while polypropylene socket is relatively cheap in comparing with the laminates. Experimental study is conducted to compare the stiffness of five prosthetic sockets made of different materials. Compression, three point flexural and tensile tests are implemented by the Testometric machine. The laminate sockets give better results in compression than polypropylene. Polypropylene gives good results in bending compared with the laminate sockets. When the socket loads are mainly in compression i.e. the low activity level patients, it seems that any of the tested sockets could be used, however, when the load will be not only in compression but in flexion as well i.e. high activity patients, socket No.1 and 5 could be used
format article
author .Haider F. Neama, M.Sc
Dr. Samira K. Radhi
Muhsin J. Jweeg
author_facet .Haider F. Neama, M.Sc
Dr. Samira K. Radhi
Muhsin J. Jweeg
author_sort .Haider F. Neama, M.Sc
title An experimental comparative study between polypropylene and laminated lower limb prosthetic socket
title_short An experimental comparative study between polypropylene and laminated lower limb prosthetic socket
title_full An experimental comparative study between polypropylene and laminated lower limb prosthetic socket
title_fullStr An experimental comparative study between polypropylene and laminated lower limb prosthetic socket
title_full_unstemmed An experimental comparative study between polypropylene and laminated lower limb prosthetic socket
title_sort experimental comparative study between polypropylene and laminated lower limb prosthetic socket
publisher Al-Khwarizmi College of Engineering – University of Baghdad
publishDate 2007
url https://doaj.org/article/c59486814d32489ba8241251c4fccdb1
work_keys_str_mv AT haiderfneamamsc anexperimentalcomparativestudybetweenpolypropyleneandlaminatedlowerlimbprostheticsocket
AT drsamirakradhi anexperimentalcomparativestudybetweenpolypropyleneandlaminatedlowerlimbprostheticsocket
AT muhsinjjweeg anexperimentalcomparativestudybetweenpolypropyleneandlaminatedlowerlimbprostheticsocket
AT haiderfneamamsc experimentalcomparativestudybetweenpolypropyleneandlaminatedlowerlimbprostheticsocket
AT drsamirakradhi experimentalcomparativestudybetweenpolypropyleneandlaminatedlowerlimbprostheticsocket
AT muhsinjjweeg experimentalcomparativestudybetweenpolypropyleneandlaminatedlowerlimbprostheticsocket
_version_ 1718398624685096960