Canopy physiology, vine performance and host-pathogen interaction in a fungi resistant cv. Sangiovese x Bianca accession vs. a susceptible clone

Abstract The present study compares the physiological and cropping response of the new fungi-resistant grapevine Accession 72–096 (‘Sangiovese’ x ‘Bianca’ hybrid) against a susceptible ‘Sangiovese’ clone which was either fully (FS-SG) or partially sprayed (PS-SG). Data logged on Accession 72–096 ind...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: S. Poni, G. Chiari, T. Caffi, F. Bove, S. Tombesi, A. Moncalvo, M. Gatti
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c5c944e7e8ba4c16b486bc5d502da673
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c5c944e7e8ba4c16b486bc5d502da673
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c5c944e7e8ba4c16b486bc5d502da6732021-12-02T12:31:50ZCanopy physiology, vine performance and host-pathogen interaction in a fungi resistant cv. Sangiovese x Bianca accession vs. a susceptible clone10.1038/s41598-017-05530-72045-2322https://doaj.org/article/c5c944e7e8ba4c16b486bc5d502da6732017-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05530-7https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The present study compares the physiological and cropping response of the new fungi-resistant grapevine Accession 72–096 (‘Sangiovese’ x ‘Bianca’ hybrid) against a susceptible ‘Sangiovese’ clone which was either fully (FS-SG) or partially sprayed (PS-SG). Data logged on Accession 72–096 indicate that while two early season sprays were enough to avoid major downy mildew (DM) and powdery mildew (PM) outbreaks, Accession 72–096 also showed concurrent desirable features such as moderate cropping, loose clusters, fast sugar accumulation coupled with sufficient acidity even at peak total soluble solids (TSS) concentration (around 24 °Brix), good color and higher flavonols prompting co-pigmentation. Conversely, FS-SG showed final lower acidity despite the notably lower sugar concentration (≅18 °Brix), as well as larger clusters and berries that resulted in more compact bunches. From a methodological viewpoint, end of season single-leaf readings appeared to overestimate the limitation of leaf function due to PM and DM infections in SG-PS vines which, when assessed via a whole-canopy approach, did not show significant differences vs. Accession 72–096, a result likely due to counteracting effects linked to a compensation mechanism by healthy tissues. Our data also suggest that a PM infection can lead to a decoupling in sugar-color accumulation patterns.S. PoniG. ChiariT. CaffiF. BoveS. TombesiA. MoncalvoM. GattiNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-14 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
S. Poni
G. Chiari
T. Caffi
F. Bove
S. Tombesi
A. Moncalvo
M. Gatti
Canopy physiology, vine performance and host-pathogen interaction in a fungi resistant cv. Sangiovese x Bianca accession vs. a susceptible clone
description Abstract The present study compares the physiological and cropping response of the new fungi-resistant grapevine Accession 72–096 (‘Sangiovese’ x ‘Bianca’ hybrid) against a susceptible ‘Sangiovese’ clone which was either fully (FS-SG) or partially sprayed (PS-SG). Data logged on Accession 72–096 indicate that while two early season sprays were enough to avoid major downy mildew (DM) and powdery mildew (PM) outbreaks, Accession 72–096 also showed concurrent desirable features such as moderate cropping, loose clusters, fast sugar accumulation coupled with sufficient acidity even at peak total soluble solids (TSS) concentration (around 24 °Brix), good color and higher flavonols prompting co-pigmentation. Conversely, FS-SG showed final lower acidity despite the notably lower sugar concentration (≅18 °Brix), as well as larger clusters and berries that resulted in more compact bunches. From a methodological viewpoint, end of season single-leaf readings appeared to overestimate the limitation of leaf function due to PM and DM infections in SG-PS vines which, when assessed via a whole-canopy approach, did not show significant differences vs. Accession 72–096, a result likely due to counteracting effects linked to a compensation mechanism by healthy tissues. Our data also suggest that a PM infection can lead to a decoupling in sugar-color accumulation patterns.
format article
author S. Poni
G. Chiari
T. Caffi
F. Bove
S. Tombesi
A. Moncalvo
M. Gatti
author_facet S. Poni
G. Chiari
T. Caffi
F. Bove
S. Tombesi
A. Moncalvo
M. Gatti
author_sort S. Poni
title Canopy physiology, vine performance and host-pathogen interaction in a fungi resistant cv. Sangiovese x Bianca accession vs. a susceptible clone
title_short Canopy physiology, vine performance and host-pathogen interaction in a fungi resistant cv. Sangiovese x Bianca accession vs. a susceptible clone
title_full Canopy physiology, vine performance and host-pathogen interaction in a fungi resistant cv. Sangiovese x Bianca accession vs. a susceptible clone
title_fullStr Canopy physiology, vine performance and host-pathogen interaction in a fungi resistant cv. Sangiovese x Bianca accession vs. a susceptible clone
title_full_unstemmed Canopy physiology, vine performance and host-pathogen interaction in a fungi resistant cv. Sangiovese x Bianca accession vs. a susceptible clone
title_sort canopy physiology, vine performance and host-pathogen interaction in a fungi resistant cv. sangiovese x bianca accession vs. a susceptible clone
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/c5c944e7e8ba4c16b486bc5d502da673
work_keys_str_mv AT sponi canopyphysiologyvineperformanceandhostpathogeninteractioninafungiresistantcvsangiovesexbiancaaccessionvsasusceptibleclone
AT gchiari canopyphysiologyvineperformanceandhostpathogeninteractioninafungiresistantcvsangiovesexbiancaaccessionvsasusceptibleclone
AT tcaffi canopyphysiologyvineperformanceandhostpathogeninteractioninafungiresistantcvsangiovesexbiancaaccessionvsasusceptibleclone
AT fbove canopyphysiologyvineperformanceandhostpathogeninteractioninafungiresistantcvsangiovesexbiancaaccessionvsasusceptibleclone
AT stombesi canopyphysiologyvineperformanceandhostpathogeninteractioninafungiresistantcvsangiovesexbiancaaccessionvsasusceptibleclone
AT amoncalvo canopyphysiologyvineperformanceandhostpathogeninteractioninafungiresistantcvsangiovesexbiancaaccessionvsasusceptibleclone
AT mgatti canopyphysiologyvineperformanceandhostpathogeninteractioninafungiresistantcvsangiovesexbiancaaccessionvsasusceptibleclone
_version_ 1718394304777420800