Canopy physiology, vine performance and host-pathogen interaction in a fungi resistant cv. Sangiovese x Bianca accession vs. a susceptible clone
Abstract The present study compares the physiological and cropping response of the new fungi-resistant grapevine Accession 72–096 (‘Sangiovese’ x ‘Bianca’ hybrid) against a susceptible ‘Sangiovese’ clone which was either fully (FS-SG) or partially sprayed (PS-SG). Data logged on Accession 72–096 ind...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/c5c944e7e8ba4c16b486bc5d502da673 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:c5c944e7e8ba4c16b486bc5d502da673 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:c5c944e7e8ba4c16b486bc5d502da6732021-12-02T12:31:50ZCanopy physiology, vine performance and host-pathogen interaction in a fungi resistant cv. Sangiovese x Bianca accession vs. a susceptible clone10.1038/s41598-017-05530-72045-2322https://doaj.org/article/c5c944e7e8ba4c16b486bc5d502da6732017-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05530-7https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The present study compares the physiological and cropping response of the new fungi-resistant grapevine Accession 72–096 (‘Sangiovese’ x ‘Bianca’ hybrid) against a susceptible ‘Sangiovese’ clone which was either fully (FS-SG) or partially sprayed (PS-SG). Data logged on Accession 72–096 indicate that while two early season sprays were enough to avoid major downy mildew (DM) and powdery mildew (PM) outbreaks, Accession 72–096 also showed concurrent desirable features such as moderate cropping, loose clusters, fast sugar accumulation coupled with sufficient acidity even at peak total soluble solids (TSS) concentration (around 24 °Brix), good color and higher flavonols prompting co-pigmentation. Conversely, FS-SG showed final lower acidity despite the notably lower sugar concentration (≅18 °Brix), as well as larger clusters and berries that resulted in more compact bunches. From a methodological viewpoint, end of season single-leaf readings appeared to overestimate the limitation of leaf function due to PM and DM infections in SG-PS vines which, when assessed via a whole-canopy approach, did not show significant differences vs. Accession 72–096, a result likely due to counteracting effects linked to a compensation mechanism by healthy tissues. Our data also suggest that a PM infection can lead to a decoupling in sugar-color accumulation patterns.S. PoniG. ChiariT. CaffiF. BoveS. TombesiA. MoncalvoM. GattiNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-14 (2017) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q S. Poni G. Chiari T. Caffi F. Bove S. Tombesi A. Moncalvo M. Gatti Canopy physiology, vine performance and host-pathogen interaction in a fungi resistant cv. Sangiovese x Bianca accession vs. a susceptible clone |
description |
Abstract The present study compares the physiological and cropping response of the new fungi-resistant grapevine Accession 72–096 (‘Sangiovese’ x ‘Bianca’ hybrid) against a susceptible ‘Sangiovese’ clone which was either fully (FS-SG) or partially sprayed (PS-SG). Data logged on Accession 72–096 indicate that while two early season sprays were enough to avoid major downy mildew (DM) and powdery mildew (PM) outbreaks, Accession 72–096 also showed concurrent desirable features such as moderate cropping, loose clusters, fast sugar accumulation coupled with sufficient acidity even at peak total soluble solids (TSS) concentration (around 24 °Brix), good color and higher flavonols prompting co-pigmentation. Conversely, FS-SG showed final lower acidity despite the notably lower sugar concentration (≅18 °Brix), as well as larger clusters and berries that resulted in more compact bunches. From a methodological viewpoint, end of season single-leaf readings appeared to overestimate the limitation of leaf function due to PM and DM infections in SG-PS vines which, when assessed via a whole-canopy approach, did not show significant differences vs. Accession 72–096, a result likely due to counteracting effects linked to a compensation mechanism by healthy tissues. Our data also suggest that a PM infection can lead to a decoupling in sugar-color accumulation patterns. |
format |
article |
author |
S. Poni G. Chiari T. Caffi F. Bove S. Tombesi A. Moncalvo M. Gatti |
author_facet |
S. Poni G. Chiari T. Caffi F. Bove S. Tombesi A. Moncalvo M. Gatti |
author_sort |
S. Poni |
title |
Canopy physiology, vine performance and host-pathogen interaction in a fungi resistant cv. Sangiovese x Bianca accession vs. a susceptible clone |
title_short |
Canopy physiology, vine performance and host-pathogen interaction in a fungi resistant cv. Sangiovese x Bianca accession vs. a susceptible clone |
title_full |
Canopy physiology, vine performance and host-pathogen interaction in a fungi resistant cv. Sangiovese x Bianca accession vs. a susceptible clone |
title_fullStr |
Canopy physiology, vine performance and host-pathogen interaction in a fungi resistant cv. Sangiovese x Bianca accession vs. a susceptible clone |
title_full_unstemmed |
Canopy physiology, vine performance and host-pathogen interaction in a fungi resistant cv. Sangiovese x Bianca accession vs. a susceptible clone |
title_sort |
canopy physiology, vine performance and host-pathogen interaction in a fungi resistant cv. sangiovese x bianca accession vs. a susceptible clone |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/c5c944e7e8ba4c16b486bc5d502da673 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sponi canopyphysiologyvineperformanceandhostpathogeninteractioninafungiresistantcvsangiovesexbiancaaccessionvsasusceptibleclone AT gchiari canopyphysiologyvineperformanceandhostpathogeninteractioninafungiresistantcvsangiovesexbiancaaccessionvsasusceptibleclone AT tcaffi canopyphysiologyvineperformanceandhostpathogeninteractioninafungiresistantcvsangiovesexbiancaaccessionvsasusceptibleclone AT fbove canopyphysiologyvineperformanceandhostpathogeninteractioninafungiresistantcvsangiovesexbiancaaccessionvsasusceptibleclone AT stombesi canopyphysiologyvineperformanceandhostpathogeninteractioninafungiresistantcvsangiovesexbiancaaccessionvsasusceptibleclone AT amoncalvo canopyphysiologyvineperformanceandhostpathogeninteractioninafungiresistantcvsangiovesexbiancaaccessionvsasusceptibleclone AT mgatti canopyphysiologyvineperformanceandhostpathogeninteractioninafungiresistantcvsangiovesexbiancaaccessionvsasusceptibleclone |
_version_ |
1718394304777420800 |