Addressing challenges with systematic review teams through effective communication: a case report

Background: Every step in the systematic review process has challenges, ranging from resistance by review teams to adherence to standard methodology to low-energy commitment to full participation. These challenges can derail the project and result in significant delays, duplication of work, and fail...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Linda C. O’Dwyer, Q. Eileen Wafford
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh 2021
Materias:
Z
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c5d1e87d53c34eb6a43f3e34cab7e8c4
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c5d1e87d53c34eb6a43f3e34cab7e8c4
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c5d1e87d53c34eb6a43f3e34cab7e8c42021-11-22T20:41:00ZAddressing challenges with systematic review teams through effective communication: a case report1536-50501558-943910.5195/jmla.2021.1222https://doaj.org/article/c5d1e87d53c34eb6a43f3e34cab7e8c42021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://jmla.pitt.edu/ojs/jmla/article/view/1222https://doaj.org/toc/1536-5050https://doaj.org/toc/1558-9439Background: Every step in the systematic review process has challenges, ranging from resistance by review teams to adherence to standard methodology to low-energy commitment to full participation. These challenges can derail the project and result in significant delays, duplication of work, and failure to complete the review. Communication during the systematic review process is key to ensuring it runs smoothly and is identified as a core competency for librarians involved in systematic reviews. Case Presentation: This case report presents effective communication approaches that our librarians employ to address challenges encountered while working with systematic review teams. The communication strategies we describe engage teams through information, questions, and action items and lead to productive collaborations with publishable systematic reviews. Conclusions: Effective communication with review teams keeps systematic review projects moving forward. The techniques covered in this case study strive to minimize misunderstandings, educate collaborators, and, in our experience, have led to multiple successful collaborations and publications. Librarians working in the systematic review space will recognize these challenges and can adapt these techniques to their own environments.Linda C. O’DwyerQ. Eileen WaffordUniversity Library System, University of Pittsburgharticlesystematic reviewcommunicationexpectationsteam managementprocess managementproject managementBibliography. Library science. Information resourcesZMedicineRENJournal of the Medical Library Association, Vol 109, Iss 4 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic systematic review
communication
expectations
team management
process management
project management
Bibliography. Library science. Information resources
Z
Medicine
R
spellingShingle systematic review
communication
expectations
team management
process management
project management
Bibliography. Library science. Information resources
Z
Medicine
R
Linda C. O’Dwyer
Q. Eileen Wafford
Addressing challenges with systematic review teams through effective communication: a case report
description Background: Every step in the systematic review process has challenges, ranging from resistance by review teams to adherence to standard methodology to low-energy commitment to full participation. These challenges can derail the project and result in significant delays, duplication of work, and failure to complete the review. Communication during the systematic review process is key to ensuring it runs smoothly and is identified as a core competency for librarians involved in systematic reviews. Case Presentation: This case report presents effective communication approaches that our librarians employ to address challenges encountered while working with systematic review teams. The communication strategies we describe engage teams through information, questions, and action items and lead to productive collaborations with publishable systematic reviews. Conclusions: Effective communication with review teams keeps systematic review projects moving forward. The techniques covered in this case study strive to minimize misunderstandings, educate collaborators, and, in our experience, have led to multiple successful collaborations and publications. Librarians working in the systematic review space will recognize these challenges and can adapt these techniques to their own environments.
format article
author Linda C. O’Dwyer
Q. Eileen Wafford
author_facet Linda C. O’Dwyer
Q. Eileen Wafford
author_sort Linda C. O’Dwyer
title Addressing challenges with systematic review teams through effective communication: a case report
title_short Addressing challenges with systematic review teams through effective communication: a case report
title_full Addressing challenges with systematic review teams through effective communication: a case report
title_fullStr Addressing challenges with systematic review teams through effective communication: a case report
title_full_unstemmed Addressing challenges with systematic review teams through effective communication: a case report
title_sort addressing challenges with systematic review teams through effective communication: a case report
publisher University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/c5d1e87d53c34eb6a43f3e34cab7e8c4
work_keys_str_mv AT lindacodwyer addressingchallengeswithsystematicreviewteamsthrougheffectivecommunicationacasereport
AT qeileenwafford addressingchallengeswithsystematicreviewteamsthrougheffectivecommunicationacasereport
_version_ 1718417402384875520