Accuracy of clean-catch technique for urine collection in young children
Introduction: Urine collection in children should respect efficacy and child safety, considering child/family satisfaction and the quality of nursing care. Clean-Catch (CCU) has been described as a non-invasive, safe and quick urine collection method used in children lacking sphincter control, for...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN PT |
| Publicado: |
Instituto Politécnico de Viseu
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/c63cd60342ab489693dcfdd4196973b8 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:c63cd60342ab489693dcfdd4196973b8 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:c63cd60342ab489693dcfdd4196973b82021-12-02T15:44:41ZAccuracy of clean-catch technique for urine collection in young children10.29352/mill0205e.17.003200873-30151647-662Xhttps://doaj.org/article/c63cd60342ab489693dcfdd4196973b82020-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://revistas.rcaap.pt/millenium/article/view/19661https://doaj.org/toc/0873-3015https://doaj.org/toc/1647-662X Introduction: Urine collection in children should respect efficacy and child safety, considering child/family satisfaction and the quality of nursing care. Clean-Catch (CCU) has been described as a non-invasive, safe and quick urine collection method used in children lacking sphincter control, for Urinary Tract infections (UTI) diagnosis in alternative to invasive methods such as urethral catheterization/suprapubic aspiration (UC/SPA). Objective: To identify scientific evidence of the accuracy of clean-catch for the diagnosis of urinary infection in neonates. Methods: A systematic review was conducted based on Cochrane Handbook guidelines (Higgins & Green, 2011) of studies comparing urine contamination rates/ accuracy diagnosis between clean-catch and UC/SPA. Selected studies in PUBMED, EBSCO, Web of Science and Scielo databases, published between 2000 and 2017, according to previously established inclusion/exclusion criteria. Two researchers evaluated the studies’ quality. Results: In a total of 297 studies, two RCTs were included that met inclusion criteria. In the first study (Labrosse, Autmizguine & Gravel, 2016) it was verified that the contamination rates of the CCU group were 16% versus 6% for UC/SPA, whereas in the second study (Herreros et al., 2015) it was 5% versus 8% for CCU and UC respectively. Conclusions: The accuracy of clean-catch for nursing practice needs to be confirmed, given the small number of studies with methodological quality that use this technique. Andreia AlmeidaGraça AparícioIsabel BicaInstituto Politécnico de Viseuarticleurinary tract infectionsurinalysisinfantnursing careSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691Public aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENPTMillenium, Vol 2, Iss 5e (2020) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
EN PT |
| topic |
urinary tract infections urinalysis infant nursing care Special aspects of education LC8-6691 Public aspects of medicine RA1-1270 |
| spellingShingle |
urinary tract infections urinalysis infant nursing care Special aspects of education LC8-6691 Public aspects of medicine RA1-1270 Andreia Almeida Graça Aparício Isabel Bica Accuracy of clean-catch technique for urine collection in young children |
| description |
Introduction: Urine collection in children should respect efficacy and child safety, considering child/family satisfaction and the quality of nursing care. Clean-Catch (CCU) has been described as a non-invasive, safe and quick urine collection method used in children lacking sphincter control, for Urinary Tract infections (UTI) diagnosis in alternative to invasive methods such as urethral catheterization/suprapubic aspiration (UC/SPA).
Objective: To identify scientific evidence of the accuracy of clean-catch for the diagnosis of urinary infection in neonates.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted based on Cochrane Handbook guidelines (Higgins & Green, 2011) of studies comparing urine contamination rates/ accuracy diagnosis between clean-catch and UC/SPA. Selected studies in PUBMED, EBSCO, Web of Science and Scielo databases, published between 2000 and 2017, according to previously established inclusion/exclusion criteria. Two researchers evaluated the studies’ quality.
Results: In a total of 297 studies, two RCTs were included that met inclusion criteria. In the first study (Labrosse, Autmizguine & Gravel, 2016) it was verified that the contamination rates of the CCU group were 16% versus 6% for UC/SPA, whereas in the second study (Herreros et al., 2015) it was 5% versus 8% for CCU and UC respectively.
Conclusions: The accuracy of clean-catch for nursing practice needs to be confirmed, given the small number of studies with methodological quality that use this technique.
|
| format |
article |
| author |
Andreia Almeida Graça Aparício Isabel Bica |
| author_facet |
Andreia Almeida Graça Aparício Isabel Bica |
| author_sort |
Andreia Almeida |
| title |
Accuracy of clean-catch technique for urine collection in young children |
| title_short |
Accuracy of clean-catch technique for urine collection in young children |
| title_full |
Accuracy of clean-catch technique for urine collection in young children |
| title_fullStr |
Accuracy of clean-catch technique for urine collection in young children |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Accuracy of clean-catch technique for urine collection in young children |
| title_sort |
accuracy of clean-catch technique for urine collection in young children |
| publisher |
Instituto Politécnico de Viseu |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/c63cd60342ab489693dcfdd4196973b8 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT andreiaalmeida accuracyofcleancatchtechniqueforurinecollectioninyoungchildren AT gracaaparicio accuracyofcleancatchtechniqueforurinecollectioninyoungchildren AT isabelbica accuracyofcleancatchtechniqueforurinecollectioninyoungchildren |
| _version_ |
1718385835959648256 |