Crisis as Art of Government

The concepts of crisis and conflict are inextricably linked to notions of modernity and draw on such heterogenous disciplines as political sciences, philosophy, economics and psychoanalysis. This paper aims to identify and analyze the so called ‘apparatus of crisis’ starting from the ancient Greece...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Dario Gentili
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN ES
Publicado:	Prof. Dr. Vittoria Borsò, Prof. Dr. Frank Leinen, Jun.-Prof. Dr. Yasmin Temelli, Prof. Dr. Guido Rings 2013
Materias:	biopolitics conflict crisis neoliberalism precariat Language and Literature P
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/c6697840a62245a69d9e4cb3336b914a
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:c6697840a62245a69d9e4cb3336b914a
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:c6697840a62245a69d9e4cb3336b914a2021-12-01T13:31:35ZCrisis as Art of Government 10.23692/imex.4.42193-9756https://doaj.org/article/c6697840a62245a69d9e4cb3336b914a2013-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.imex-revista.com/crisis-art-government/https://doaj.org/toc/2193-9756The concepts of crisis and conflict are inextricably linked to notions of modernity and draw on such heterogenous disciplines as political sciences, philosophy, economics and psychoanalysis. This paper aims to identify and analyze the so called ‘apparatus of crisis’ starting from the ancient Greece conception of krisis in medical and political fields. On the strength of the bio-political genealogy of crisis, I argue that the diffusion and the pervasiveness of the term ‘crisis’ are not at all signs of semantic ‘vagueness’, as Reihart Koselleck affirms, but rather denote the ‘highest effectiveness of its apparatus’ the highest effectiveness that is apparent nowadays, when the crisis has become the ‘art of government’ par excellence. The nature of each crisis has set a specific concept and practice of conflict and, therefore, a specific process of political subjectification. Unlike the past, today the predominant apparatus of crisis has a manifest biopolitical nature and so it implies the neoliberalism’s axiom that “there is no alternative”, and therefore tends to neutralize the conflict and to marginalize in the precarity the forms of life that could be constituent expressions of it. Is it therefore possible to think of the conflict and its processes of subjectification as pulled out from the apparatus of the neo-liberal crisis?Dario GentiliProf. Dr. Vittoria Borsò, Prof. Dr. Frank Leinen, Jun.-Prof. Dr. Yasmin Temelli, Prof. Dr. Guido RingsarticlebiopoliticsconflictcrisisneoliberalismprecariatLanguage and LiteraturePENESiMex. México Interdisciplinario/Interdisciplinary Mexico, Vol 2, Iss 4, Pp 21-29 (2013)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN ES
topic	biopolitics conflict crisis neoliberalism precariat Language and Literature P
spellingShingle	biopolitics conflict crisis neoliberalism precariat Language and Literature P Dario Gentili Crisis as Art of Government
description	The concepts of crisis and conflict are inextricably linked to notions of modernity and draw on such heterogenous disciplines as political sciences, philosophy, economics and psychoanalysis. This paper aims to identify and analyze the so called ‘apparatus of crisis’ starting from the ancient Greece conception of krisis in medical and political fields. On the strength of the bio-political genealogy of crisis, I argue that the diffusion and the pervasiveness of the term ‘crisis’ are not at all signs of semantic ‘vagueness’, as Reihart Koselleck affirms, but rather denote the ‘highest effectiveness of its apparatus’ the highest effectiveness that is apparent nowadays, when the crisis has become the ‘art of government’ par excellence. The nature of each crisis has set a specific concept and practice of conflict and, therefore, a specific process of political subjectification. Unlike the past, today the predominant apparatus of crisis has a manifest biopolitical nature and so it implies the neoliberalism’s axiom that “there is no alternative”, and therefore tends to neutralize the conflict and to marginalize in the precarity the forms of life that could be constituent expressions of it. Is it therefore possible to think of the conflict and its processes of subjectification as pulled out from the apparatus of the neo-liberal crisis?
format	article
author	Dario Gentili
author_facet	Dario Gentili
author_sort	Dario Gentili
title	Crisis as Art of Government
title_short	Crisis as Art of Government
title_full	Crisis as Art of Government
title_fullStr	Crisis as Art of Government
title_full_unstemmed	Crisis as Art of Government
title_sort	crisis as art of government
publisher	Prof. Dr. Vittoria Borsò, Prof. Dr. Frank Leinen, Jun.-Prof. Dr. Yasmin Temelli, Prof. Dr. Guido Rings
publishDate	2013
url	https://doaj.org/article/c6697840a62245a69d9e4cb3336b914a
work_keys_str_mv	AT dariogentili crisisasartofgovernment
_version_	1718405138060673024

Crisis as Art of Government

Ejemplares similares