Effects of Social Exclusion on Effortful Control and Mentalizing in relation to Borderline Personality Features

Abstract The current study investigated the effects of social interactions on effortful control (EC) and mentalizing in individuals with borderline personality disorder (BPD) features. 123 nonclinical participants completed the emotional Stroop task to assess EC and the modified Reading the Mind in...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Momoko Sato, Peter Fonagy, Patrick Luyten
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2018
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c6a3284542734099877c160ea7371643
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c6a3284542734099877c160ea7371643
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c6a3284542734099877c160ea73716432021-12-02T15:09:12ZEffects of Social Exclusion on Effortful Control and Mentalizing in relation to Borderline Personality Features10.1038/s41598-018-32775-72045-2322https://doaj.org/article/c6a3284542734099877c160ea73716432018-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32775-7https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The current study investigated the effects of social interactions on effortful control (EC) and mentalizing in individuals with borderline personality disorder (BPD) features. 123 nonclinical participants completed the emotional Stroop task to assess EC and the modified Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) to assess mentalizing capacities before and after having social interactions. The Cyberball paradigm was used to generate socially inclusive and exclusive interactions. Results indicated the high BPD group made more errors on the Stroop task following exclusive social interactions than the low BPD group. The high BPD group, compared to the low BPD group, associated fewer emotional words with facial cues following inclusive social interactions but overanalysed facial cues (hypermentalizing) following the exclusive social interaction. Exclusive social interactions hindered the inhibitory capacities in individuals with high BPD features, but inclusive social interactions facilitated. Individuals with high BPD features responded to exclusive social interactions by hypermentalizing. Thus, it was found social rejection could activate cognitive-affective processes which led to hypermentalizing and impairments in EC which in combination could explain the disruptive effects on social interactions in people with BPD features.Momoko SatoPeter FonagyPatrick LuytenNature PortfolioarticleEffortful Control (EC)Theory Of MindReading The Mind In The Eyes Test (RMET)Emotional Stroop TaskCyberball ParadigmMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 8, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2018)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Effortful Control (EC)
Theory Of Mind
Reading The Mind In The Eyes Test (RMET)
Emotional Stroop Task
Cyberball Paradigm
Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Effortful Control (EC)
Theory Of Mind
Reading The Mind In The Eyes Test (RMET)
Emotional Stroop Task
Cyberball Paradigm
Medicine
R
Science
Q
Momoko Sato
Peter Fonagy
Patrick Luyten
Effects of Social Exclusion on Effortful Control and Mentalizing in relation to Borderline Personality Features
description Abstract The current study investigated the effects of social interactions on effortful control (EC) and mentalizing in individuals with borderline personality disorder (BPD) features. 123 nonclinical participants completed the emotional Stroop task to assess EC and the modified Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) to assess mentalizing capacities before and after having social interactions. The Cyberball paradigm was used to generate socially inclusive and exclusive interactions. Results indicated the high BPD group made more errors on the Stroop task following exclusive social interactions than the low BPD group. The high BPD group, compared to the low BPD group, associated fewer emotional words with facial cues following inclusive social interactions but overanalysed facial cues (hypermentalizing) following the exclusive social interaction. Exclusive social interactions hindered the inhibitory capacities in individuals with high BPD features, but inclusive social interactions facilitated. Individuals with high BPD features responded to exclusive social interactions by hypermentalizing. Thus, it was found social rejection could activate cognitive-affective processes which led to hypermentalizing and impairments in EC which in combination could explain the disruptive effects on social interactions in people with BPD features.
format article
author Momoko Sato
Peter Fonagy
Patrick Luyten
author_facet Momoko Sato
Peter Fonagy
Patrick Luyten
author_sort Momoko Sato
title Effects of Social Exclusion on Effortful Control and Mentalizing in relation to Borderline Personality Features
title_short Effects of Social Exclusion on Effortful Control and Mentalizing in relation to Borderline Personality Features
title_full Effects of Social Exclusion on Effortful Control and Mentalizing in relation to Borderline Personality Features
title_fullStr Effects of Social Exclusion on Effortful Control and Mentalizing in relation to Borderline Personality Features
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Social Exclusion on Effortful Control and Mentalizing in relation to Borderline Personality Features
title_sort effects of social exclusion on effortful control and mentalizing in relation to borderline personality features
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2018
url https://doaj.org/article/c6a3284542734099877c160ea7371643
work_keys_str_mv AT momokosato effectsofsocialexclusiononeffortfulcontrolandmentalizinginrelationtoborderlinepersonalityfeatures
AT peterfonagy effectsofsocialexclusiononeffortfulcontrolandmentalizinginrelationtoborderlinepersonalityfeatures
AT patrickluyten effectsofsocialexclusiononeffortfulcontrolandmentalizinginrelationtoborderlinepersonalityfeatures
_version_ 1718387902591795200