Pies wierny, ale uciążliwy, czyli rzecz o metaforze (Leśmiana i nie tylko)

A dog loyal but tiresome: on metaphor in Leśmian’s poetry and beyond The paper is a polemical commentary on Wacław Cockiewicz’s monograph Metaforyka Leśmiana (Analiza lingwistyczna). [Metaphors in Leśmian’s poetry (A linguistic analysis)]. It is claimed that although the author of the book rejec...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Elżbieta Muskat-Tabakowska
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	DE EN FR PL RU
Publicado:	Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing 2014
Materias:	domena poznawcza eksplikacja językoznawstwo kognitywne metafora metafora obrazowa metafora pojęciowa Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar P101-410
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/c6d205b0ad23484eb220ed3699eecbea
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:c6d205b0ad23484eb220ed3699eecbea
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:c6d205b0ad23484eb220ed3699eecbea2021-11-27T13:02:31ZPies wierny, ale uciążliwy, czyli rzecz o metaforze (Leśmiana i nie tylko)10.12797/LV.09.2014.18.181896-21222392-1226https://doaj.org/article/c6d205b0ad23484eb220ed3699eecbea2014-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.akademicka.pl/lv/article/view/2825https://doaj.org/toc/1896-2122https://doaj.org/toc/2392-1226 A dog loyal but tiresome: on metaphor in Leśmian’s poetry and beyond The paper is a polemical commentary on Wacław Cockiewicz’s monograph Metaforyka Leśmiana (Analiza lingwistyczna). [Metaphors in Leśmian’s poetry (A linguistic analysis)]. It is claimed that although the author of the book rejects as inadequate the cognitive theory of metaphor developed by George Lakoff and his followers, some of his tacit assumptions actually follow its premises. On the other hand, lack of coherent methodology and erroneous treatment of metaphor as the relation of equivalence (A equals B) result in incoherent or downright incorrect interpretation of many metaphors selected for analysis. Individual items from the corpus are presented in alphabetical order, without concern for either the level of their specificity or their semantic cognation. In effect, their systematicity is often missed. Moreover, in some cases Cockiewicz finds himself unable to interpret Leśmian’s metaphors, and thus his final conclusions – though intuitively correct and partially corroborated by some of the analyses – are undermined. Elżbieta Muskat-TabakowskaKsiegarnia Akademicka Publishingarticledomena poznawczaeksplikacjajęzykoznawstwo kognitywnemetaforametafora obrazowametafora pojęciowaLanguage. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammarP101-410DEENFRPLRULingVaria, Vol 9, Iss 18 (2014)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	DE EN FR PL RU
topic	domena poznawcza eksplikacja językoznawstwo kognitywne metafora metafora obrazowa metafora pojęciowa Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar P101-410
spellingShingle	domena poznawcza eksplikacja językoznawstwo kognitywne metafora metafora obrazowa metafora pojęciowa Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar P101-410 Elżbieta Muskat-Tabakowska Pies wierny, ale uciążliwy, czyli rzecz o metaforze (Leśmiana i nie tylko)
description	A dog loyal but tiresome: on metaphor in Leśmian’s poetry and beyond The paper is a polemical commentary on Wacław Cockiewicz’s monograph Metaforyka Leśmiana (Analiza lingwistyczna). [Metaphors in Leśmian’s poetry (A linguistic analysis)]. It is claimed that although the author of the book rejects as inadequate the cognitive theory of metaphor developed by George Lakoff and his followers, some of his tacit assumptions actually follow its premises. On the other hand, lack of coherent methodology and erroneous treatment of metaphor as the relation of equivalence (A equals B) result in incoherent or downright incorrect interpretation of many metaphors selected for analysis. Individual items from the corpus are presented in alphabetical order, without concern for either the level of their specificity or their semantic cognation. In effect, their systematicity is often missed. Moreover, in some cases Cockiewicz finds himself unable to interpret Leśmian’s metaphors, and thus his final conclusions – though intuitively correct and partially corroborated by some of the analyses – are undermined.
format	article
author	Elżbieta Muskat-Tabakowska
author_facet	Elżbieta Muskat-Tabakowska
author_sort	Elżbieta Muskat-Tabakowska
title	Pies wierny, ale uciążliwy, czyli rzecz o metaforze (Leśmiana i nie tylko)
title_short	Pies wierny, ale uciążliwy, czyli rzecz o metaforze (Leśmiana i nie tylko)
title_full	Pies wierny, ale uciążliwy, czyli rzecz o metaforze (Leśmiana i nie tylko)
title_fullStr	Pies wierny, ale uciążliwy, czyli rzecz o metaforze (Leśmiana i nie tylko)
title_full_unstemmed	Pies wierny, ale uciążliwy, czyli rzecz o metaforze (Leśmiana i nie tylko)
title_sort	pies wierny, ale uciążliwy, czyli rzecz o metaforze (leśmiana i nie tylko)
publisher	Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing
publishDate	2014
url	https://doaj.org/article/c6d205b0ad23484eb220ed3699eecbea
work_keys_str_mv	AT elzbietamuskattabakowska pieswiernyaleuciazliwyczylirzeczometaforzelesmianainietylko
_version_	1718408828230303744

Pies wierny, ale uciążliwy, czyli rzecz o metaforze (Leśmiana i nie tylko)

Ejemplares similares