Quantifying materials waste in the Egyptian construction industry: A critical analysis of rates and factors
Construction and demolition waste (CDW) is a critical challenge facing the construction industry. It leads to deterioration of the triple bottom line of sustainability. Unfortunately, the CDW management research in Egypt lacks studies investigating (1) the variations in CDW generation (CDWG) among d...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/c7237e86a67f4cf883cbeb13543b11a1 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:c7237e86a67f4cf883cbeb13543b11a1 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:c7237e86a67f4cf883cbeb13543b11a12021-11-22T04:21:53ZQuantifying materials waste in the Egyptian construction industry: A critical analysis of rates and factors2090-447910.1016/j.asej.2021.02.039https://doaj.org/article/c7237e86a67f4cf883cbeb13543b11a12021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090447921001842https://doaj.org/toc/2090-4479Construction and demolition waste (CDW) is a critical challenge facing the construction industry. It leads to deterioration of the triple bottom line of sustainability. Unfortunately, the CDW management research in Egypt lacks studies investigating (1) the variations in CDW generation (CDWG) among different types of construction projects, and (2) the factors affecting CDW reduction (CDWR). Based on a benchmarking approach, this research (1) quantifies CDW in terms of generation rates and costs among different construction project types in Egypt, and (2) investigates the relationship between CDWG and different adopted CDWR factors. Using structured interviews, a comparative case study was conducted to investigate industrial, residential, commercial, and infrastructure projects. Analysis of results demonstrated that CDWG rates and costs differ from one project type to another due to the project's nature, size, and complexity on the one hand, and the applied CDWR factors such as waste-efficient practices, awareness, culture & behaviour, and legislation on the other hand. On average among the four project types, it was found that “timber”, “sand”, and “bricks/blocks” are the most wasteful materials. It was also found that “practices” and “legislation” are the least applied CDWR factors on average among the four project types, which need to be better applied for better CDWR results.Ahmed Osama DaoudAyman Ahmed Ezzat OthmanObas John EbohonAli BayyatiElsevierarticleConstruction and demolition wasteWaste reduction factorsSustainabilityQuantitative analysisQualitative analysisEgyptEngineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040ENAin Shams Engineering Journal, Vol 12, Iss 4, Pp 4275-4289 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Construction and demolition waste Waste reduction factors Sustainability Quantitative analysis Qualitative analysis Egypt Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 |
spellingShingle |
Construction and demolition waste Waste reduction factors Sustainability Quantitative analysis Qualitative analysis Egypt Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Ahmed Osama Daoud Ayman Ahmed Ezzat Othman Obas John Ebohon Ali Bayyati Quantifying materials waste in the Egyptian construction industry: A critical analysis of rates and factors |
description |
Construction and demolition waste (CDW) is a critical challenge facing the construction industry. It leads to deterioration of the triple bottom line of sustainability. Unfortunately, the CDW management research in Egypt lacks studies investigating (1) the variations in CDW generation (CDWG) among different types of construction projects, and (2) the factors affecting CDW reduction (CDWR). Based on a benchmarking approach, this research (1) quantifies CDW in terms of generation rates and costs among different construction project types in Egypt, and (2) investigates the relationship between CDWG and different adopted CDWR factors. Using structured interviews, a comparative case study was conducted to investigate industrial, residential, commercial, and infrastructure projects. Analysis of results demonstrated that CDWG rates and costs differ from one project type to another due to the project's nature, size, and complexity on the one hand, and the applied CDWR factors such as waste-efficient practices, awareness, culture & behaviour, and legislation on the other hand. On average among the four project types, it was found that “timber”, “sand”, and “bricks/blocks” are the most wasteful materials. It was also found that “practices” and “legislation” are the least applied CDWR factors on average among the four project types, which need to be better applied for better CDWR results. |
format |
article |
author |
Ahmed Osama Daoud Ayman Ahmed Ezzat Othman Obas John Ebohon Ali Bayyati |
author_facet |
Ahmed Osama Daoud Ayman Ahmed Ezzat Othman Obas John Ebohon Ali Bayyati |
author_sort |
Ahmed Osama Daoud |
title |
Quantifying materials waste in the Egyptian construction industry: A critical analysis of rates and factors |
title_short |
Quantifying materials waste in the Egyptian construction industry: A critical analysis of rates and factors |
title_full |
Quantifying materials waste in the Egyptian construction industry: A critical analysis of rates and factors |
title_fullStr |
Quantifying materials waste in the Egyptian construction industry: A critical analysis of rates and factors |
title_full_unstemmed |
Quantifying materials waste in the Egyptian construction industry: A critical analysis of rates and factors |
title_sort |
quantifying materials waste in the egyptian construction industry: a critical analysis of rates and factors |
publisher |
Elsevier |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/c7237e86a67f4cf883cbeb13543b11a1 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ahmedosamadaoud quantifyingmaterialswasteintheegyptianconstructionindustryacriticalanalysisofratesandfactors AT aymanahmedezzatothman quantifyingmaterialswasteintheegyptianconstructionindustryacriticalanalysisofratesandfactors AT obasjohnebohon quantifyingmaterialswasteintheegyptianconstructionindustryacriticalanalysisofratesandfactors AT alibayyati quantifyingmaterialswasteintheegyptianconstructionindustryacriticalanalysisofratesandfactors |
_version_ |
1718418248302592000 |