Quantifying materials waste in the Egyptian construction industry: A critical analysis of rates and factors

Construction and demolition waste (CDW) is a critical challenge facing the construction industry. It leads to deterioration of the triple bottom line of sustainability. Unfortunately, the CDW management research in Egypt lacks studies investigating (1) the variations in CDW generation (CDWG) among d...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmed Osama Daoud, Ayman Ahmed Ezzat Othman, Obas John Ebohon, Ali Bayyati
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c7237e86a67f4cf883cbeb13543b11a1
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c7237e86a67f4cf883cbeb13543b11a1
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c7237e86a67f4cf883cbeb13543b11a12021-11-22T04:21:53ZQuantifying materials waste in the Egyptian construction industry: A critical analysis of rates and factors2090-447910.1016/j.asej.2021.02.039https://doaj.org/article/c7237e86a67f4cf883cbeb13543b11a12021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090447921001842https://doaj.org/toc/2090-4479Construction and demolition waste (CDW) is a critical challenge facing the construction industry. It leads to deterioration of the triple bottom line of sustainability. Unfortunately, the CDW management research in Egypt lacks studies investigating (1) the variations in CDW generation (CDWG) among different types of construction projects, and (2) the factors affecting CDW reduction (CDWR). Based on a benchmarking approach, this research (1) quantifies CDW in terms of generation rates and costs among different construction project types in Egypt, and (2) investigates the relationship between CDWG and different adopted CDWR factors. Using structured interviews, a comparative case study was conducted to investigate industrial, residential, commercial, and infrastructure projects. Analysis of results demonstrated that CDWG rates and costs differ from one project type to another due to the project's nature, size, and complexity on the one hand, and the applied CDWR factors such as waste-efficient practices, awareness, culture & behaviour, and legislation on the other hand. On average among the four project types, it was found that “timber”, “sand”, and “bricks/blocks” are the most wasteful materials. It was also found that “practices” and “legislation” are the least applied CDWR factors on average among the four project types, which need to be better applied for better CDWR results.Ahmed Osama DaoudAyman Ahmed Ezzat OthmanObas John EbohonAli BayyatiElsevierarticleConstruction and demolition wasteWaste reduction factorsSustainabilityQuantitative analysisQualitative analysisEgyptEngineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040ENAin Shams Engineering Journal, Vol 12, Iss 4, Pp 4275-4289 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Construction and demolition waste
Waste reduction factors
Sustainability
Quantitative analysis
Qualitative analysis
Egypt
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
spellingShingle Construction and demolition waste
Waste reduction factors
Sustainability
Quantitative analysis
Qualitative analysis
Egypt
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
Ahmed Osama Daoud
Ayman Ahmed Ezzat Othman
Obas John Ebohon
Ali Bayyati
Quantifying materials waste in the Egyptian construction industry: A critical analysis of rates and factors
description Construction and demolition waste (CDW) is a critical challenge facing the construction industry. It leads to deterioration of the triple bottom line of sustainability. Unfortunately, the CDW management research in Egypt lacks studies investigating (1) the variations in CDW generation (CDWG) among different types of construction projects, and (2) the factors affecting CDW reduction (CDWR). Based on a benchmarking approach, this research (1) quantifies CDW in terms of generation rates and costs among different construction project types in Egypt, and (2) investigates the relationship between CDWG and different adopted CDWR factors. Using structured interviews, a comparative case study was conducted to investigate industrial, residential, commercial, and infrastructure projects. Analysis of results demonstrated that CDWG rates and costs differ from one project type to another due to the project's nature, size, and complexity on the one hand, and the applied CDWR factors such as waste-efficient practices, awareness, culture & behaviour, and legislation on the other hand. On average among the four project types, it was found that “timber”, “sand”, and “bricks/blocks” are the most wasteful materials. It was also found that “practices” and “legislation” are the least applied CDWR factors on average among the four project types, which need to be better applied for better CDWR results.
format article
author Ahmed Osama Daoud
Ayman Ahmed Ezzat Othman
Obas John Ebohon
Ali Bayyati
author_facet Ahmed Osama Daoud
Ayman Ahmed Ezzat Othman
Obas John Ebohon
Ali Bayyati
author_sort Ahmed Osama Daoud
title Quantifying materials waste in the Egyptian construction industry: A critical analysis of rates and factors
title_short Quantifying materials waste in the Egyptian construction industry: A critical analysis of rates and factors
title_full Quantifying materials waste in the Egyptian construction industry: A critical analysis of rates and factors
title_fullStr Quantifying materials waste in the Egyptian construction industry: A critical analysis of rates and factors
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying materials waste in the Egyptian construction industry: A critical analysis of rates and factors
title_sort quantifying materials waste in the egyptian construction industry: a critical analysis of rates and factors
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/c7237e86a67f4cf883cbeb13543b11a1
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedosamadaoud quantifyingmaterialswasteintheegyptianconstructionindustryacriticalanalysisofratesandfactors
AT aymanahmedezzatothman quantifyingmaterialswasteintheegyptianconstructionindustryacriticalanalysisofratesandfactors
AT obasjohnebohon quantifyingmaterialswasteintheegyptianconstructionindustryacriticalanalysisofratesandfactors
AT alibayyati quantifyingmaterialswasteintheegyptianconstructionindustryacriticalanalysisofratesandfactors
_version_ 1718418248302592000