GENERAL STRUCTURE OF THE REVISED BLOOM’S TAXONOMY: REASONS AND MODIFICATIONS

The objective of this study is to find the answers of the following questions on Bloom’s taxonomy which was revised in 2001: 1- What are the reasons for the revision of the Bloom’s taxonomy which has been used commonly since 1956? 2- What are the differences in the revised Bloom’s taxonomy? Descript...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zeynep DEMİRTAŞ, Ömer F. TUTKUN, Serhat ARSLAN, Duygu GÜR ERDOĞAN
Formato: article
Lenguaje:DE
EN
FR
TR
Publicado: Fırat University 2019
Materias:
H
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c7425fbd2ef0484ca57f228fdc7f18fd
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c7425fbd2ef0484ca57f228fdc7f18fd
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c7425fbd2ef0484ca57f228fdc7f18fd2021-11-24T09:20:56ZGENERAL STRUCTURE OF THE REVISED BLOOM’S TAXONOMY: REASONS AND MODIFICATIONS2148-416310.9761/JASSS2684https://doaj.org/article/c7425fbd2ef0484ca57f228fdc7f18fd2019-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://jasstudies.com/index.jsp?mod=tammetin&makaleadi=244221040_5-Do%C3%A7.%20Dr.%20%C3%96mer%20F.%20TUTKUN-Zeynep%20Demirta%C5%9F.pdf&key=27324https://doaj.org/toc/2148-4163The objective of this study is to find the answers of the following questions on Bloom’s taxonomy which was revised in 2001: 1- What are the reasons for the revision of the Bloom’s taxonomy which has been used commonly since 1956? 2- What are the differences in the revised Bloom’s taxonomy? Descriptive method was used for this study. The results obtained after the analysis of the data by searching the literature in terms of the problems of the research are as follows: 1- Modern times has required the necessity of the renewal of the taxonomy in accordance with the new understandings and knowledge within the context of learning-teaching processes to be ready for the new century. 2- Revised taxonomy has elasticated the strict hierarchical frame of the original taxonomy and has enabled the adjacency of the categories. 3- The revision in taxonomy on the terminological and structural changes has facilitated the planning process of teaching. 4- The revision of the sub categories in terms of cognitive and informational phases and an increase in their numbers has enabled the performance evaluation for evaluation process by facilitating the objective writing phase.Zeynep DEMİRTAŞÖmer F. TUTKUNSerhat ARSLANDuygu GÜR ERDOĞANFırat Universityarticlebloom taxonomy, revised bloom’s taxonomy, cognitive domain, teachinglearning, curriculumSocial SciencesHSocial sciences (General)H1-99DEENFRTRJournal of Academic Social Science Studies , Vol 8, Iss 32, Pp 57-62 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language DE
EN
FR
TR
topic bloom taxonomy, revised bloom’s taxonomy, cognitive domain, teaching
learning, curriculum
Social Sciences
H
Social sciences (General)
H1-99
spellingShingle bloom taxonomy, revised bloom’s taxonomy, cognitive domain, teaching
learning, curriculum
Social Sciences
H
Social sciences (General)
H1-99
Zeynep DEMİRTAŞ
Ömer F. TUTKUN
Serhat ARSLAN
Duygu GÜR ERDOĞAN
GENERAL STRUCTURE OF THE REVISED BLOOM’S TAXONOMY: REASONS AND MODIFICATIONS
description The objective of this study is to find the answers of the following questions on Bloom’s taxonomy which was revised in 2001: 1- What are the reasons for the revision of the Bloom’s taxonomy which has been used commonly since 1956? 2- What are the differences in the revised Bloom’s taxonomy? Descriptive method was used for this study. The results obtained after the analysis of the data by searching the literature in terms of the problems of the research are as follows: 1- Modern times has required the necessity of the renewal of the taxonomy in accordance with the new understandings and knowledge within the context of learning-teaching processes to be ready for the new century. 2- Revised taxonomy has elasticated the strict hierarchical frame of the original taxonomy and has enabled the adjacency of the categories. 3- The revision in taxonomy on the terminological and structural changes has facilitated the planning process of teaching. 4- The revision of the sub categories in terms of cognitive and informational phases and an increase in their numbers has enabled the performance evaluation for evaluation process by facilitating the objective writing phase.
format article
author Zeynep DEMİRTAŞ
Ömer F. TUTKUN
Serhat ARSLAN
Duygu GÜR ERDOĞAN
author_facet Zeynep DEMİRTAŞ
Ömer F. TUTKUN
Serhat ARSLAN
Duygu GÜR ERDOĞAN
author_sort Zeynep DEMİRTAŞ
title GENERAL STRUCTURE OF THE REVISED BLOOM’S TAXONOMY: REASONS AND MODIFICATIONS
title_short GENERAL STRUCTURE OF THE REVISED BLOOM’S TAXONOMY: REASONS AND MODIFICATIONS
title_full GENERAL STRUCTURE OF THE REVISED BLOOM’S TAXONOMY: REASONS AND MODIFICATIONS
title_fullStr GENERAL STRUCTURE OF THE REVISED BLOOM’S TAXONOMY: REASONS AND MODIFICATIONS
title_full_unstemmed GENERAL STRUCTURE OF THE REVISED BLOOM’S TAXONOMY: REASONS AND MODIFICATIONS
title_sort general structure of the revised bloom’s taxonomy: reasons and modifications
publisher Fırat University
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/c7425fbd2ef0484ca57f228fdc7f18fd
work_keys_str_mv AT zeynepdemirtas generalstructureoftherevisedbloomstaxonomyreasonsandmodifications
AT omerftutkun generalstructureoftherevisedbloomstaxonomyreasonsandmodifications
AT serhatarslan generalstructureoftherevisedbloomstaxonomyreasonsandmodifications
AT duygugurerdogan generalstructureoftherevisedbloomstaxonomyreasonsandmodifications
_version_ 1718415381561868288