Comprehensive review of statistical methods for analysing patient-reported outcomes (PROs) used as primary outcomes in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published by the UK’s Health Technology Assessment (HTA) journal (1997–2020)
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Richard Jacques, Laura Flight, Yirui Qian |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/c745f914c5db43a1a2e1b90f7018d806 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
The Effect of Therapeutic Hypothermia after Cardiac Arrest on the Neurological Outcome and Survival—A Systematic Review of RCTs Published between 2016 and 2020
por: Christian Colls Garrido, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in randomised controlled trials in diabetes and pregnancy: protocol for a systematic review
por: Declan Devane, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Are sample sizes clear and justified in RCTs published in dental journals?
por: Despina Koletsi, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
HB-HTA as an implementation problem in Polish health policy.
por: Małgorzata Gałązka-Sobotka, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Glibenclamide therapy: pros and cons
por: Olga Konstantinovna Vikulova, et al.
Publicado: (2011)