Participatory assessment of sustainability and resilience of three specialized farming systems

There is a need for participatory methods that simultaneously assess agricultural sustainability and resilience at farming system level, as resilience is needed to deal with shocks and stresses on the pathways to more sustainable systems. We present the Framework of Participatory Impact Assessment f...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wim Paas, Isabeau Coopmans, Simone Severini, Martin K. van Ittersum, Miranda P. M. Meuwissen, Pytrik Reidsma
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Resilience Alliance 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c7831aab80c54137a67ac113734145b1
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c7831aab80c54137a67ac113734145b1
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c7831aab80c54137a67ac113734145b12021-11-15T16:40:17ZParticipatory assessment of sustainability and resilience of three specialized farming systems1708-308710.5751/ES-12200-260202https://doaj.org/article/c7831aab80c54137a67ac113734145b12021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol26/iss2/art2/https://doaj.org/toc/1708-3087There is a need for participatory methods that simultaneously assess agricultural sustainability and resilience at farming system level, as resilience is needed to deal with shocks and stresses on the pathways to more sustainable systems. We present the Framework of Participatory Impact Assessment for Sustainable and Resilient FARMing systems (FoPIA-SURE-Farm). FoPIA-SURE-Farm investigates farming system functioning, dynamics of main indicators, and specifies resilience for different resilience capacities, i.e., robustness, adaptability, and transformability. Three case studies with specialized farming systems serve as an example for the used methodology: starch potato production in Veenkoloniën, The Netherlands; dairy production in Flanders, Belgium; and hazelnut production in Lazio, Italy. In all three farming systems, functions that related to food production, economic viability, and maintaining natural resources were perceived as most important. Perceived overall performance of system functions suggest moderate sustainability of the studied farming systems. In the studied systems, robustness was perceived to be stronger than adaptability and transformability. This indicates that finding pathways to higher sustainability, which requires adaptability and transformability, will be a challenging process. General characteristics of farming systems that supposedly convey general resilience, the so-called resilience attributes, were indeed perceived to contribute positively to resilience. Profitability, having production coupled with local and natural resources, heterogeneity of farm types, social self-organization, and infrastructure for innovation were assessed as being important resilience attributes. The relative importance of some resilience attributes in the studied systems differed from case to case, e.g., heterogeneity of farm types. This indicates that the local context in general, and stakeholder perspectives in particular, are important when evaluating general resilience and policy options based on resilience attributes. Overall, FoPIA-SURE-Farm results seem a good starting point for raising awareness, further assessments, and eventually for developing a shared vision and action plan for improving sustainability and resilience of farming systems.Wim PaasIsabeau CoopmansSimone SeveriniMartin K. van IttersumMiranda P. M. MeuwissenPytrik ReidsmaResilience Alliancearticleadaptabilityagriculturerobustnesssocial-ecological systemstransformabilityBiology (General)QH301-705.5EcologyQH540-549.5ENEcology and Society, Vol 26, Iss 2, p 2 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic adaptability
agriculture
robustness
social-ecological systems
transformability
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle adaptability
agriculture
robustness
social-ecological systems
transformability
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Wim Paas
Isabeau Coopmans
Simone Severini
Martin K. van Ittersum
Miranda P. M. Meuwissen
Pytrik Reidsma
Participatory assessment of sustainability and resilience of three specialized farming systems
description There is a need for participatory methods that simultaneously assess agricultural sustainability and resilience at farming system level, as resilience is needed to deal with shocks and stresses on the pathways to more sustainable systems. We present the Framework of Participatory Impact Assessment for Sustainable and Resilient FARMing systems (FoPIA-SURE-Farm). FoPIA-SURE-Farm investigates farming system functioning, dynamics of main indicators, and specifies resilience for different resilience capacities, i.e., robustness, adaptability, and transformability. Three case studies with specialized farming systems serve as an example for the used methodology: starch potato production in Veenkoloniën, The Netherlands; dairy production in Flanders, Belgium; and hazelnut production in Lazio, Italy. In all three farming systems, functions that related to food production, economic viability, and maintaining natural resources were perceived as most important. Perceived overall performance of system functions suggest moderate sustainability of the studied farming systems. In the studied systems, robustness was perceived to be stronger than adaptability and transformability. This indicates that finding pathways to higher sustainability, which requires adaptability and transformability, will be a challenging process. General characteristics of farming systems that supposedly convey general resilience, the so-called resilience attributes, were indeed perceived to contribute positively to resilience. Profitability, having production coupled with local and natural resources, heterogeneity of farm types, social self-organization, and infrastructure for innovation were assessed as being important resilience attributes. The relative importance of some resilience attributes in the studied systems differed from case to case, e.g., heterogeneity of farm types. This indicates that the local context in general, and stakeholder perspectives in particular, are important when evaluating general resilience and policy options based on resilience attributes. Overall, FoPIA-SURE-Farm results seem a good starting point for raising awareness, further assessments, and eventually for developing a shared vision and action plan for improving sustainability and resilience of farming systems.
format article
author Wim Paas
Isabeau Coopmans
Simone Severini
Martin K. van Ittersum
Miranda P. M. Meuwissen
Pytrik Reidsma
author_facet Wim Paas
Isabeau Coopmans
Simone Severini
Martin K. van Ittersum
Miranda P. M. Meuwissen
Pytrik Reidsma
author_sort Wim Paas
title Participatory assessment of sustainability and resilience of three specialized farming systems
title_short Participatory assessment of sustainability and resilience of three specialized farming systems
title_full Participatory assessment of sustainability and resilience of three specialized farming systems
title_fullStr Participatory assessment of sustainability and resilience of three specialized farming systems
title_full_unstemmed Participatory assessment of sustainability and resilience of three specialized farming systems
title_sort participatory assessment of sustainability and resilience of three specialized farming systems
publisher Resilience Alliance
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/c7831aab80c54137a67ac113734145b1
work_keys_str_mv AT wimpaas participatoryassessmentofsustainabilityandresilienceofthreespecializedfarmingsystems
AT isabeaucoopmans participatoryassessmentofsustainabilityandresilienceofthreespecializedfarmingsystems
AT simoneseverini participatoryassessmentofsustainabilityandresilienceofthreespecializedfarmingsystems
AT martinkvanittersum participatoryassessmentofsustainabilityandresilienceofthreespecializedfarmingsystems
AT mirandapmmeuwissen participatoryassessmentofsustainabilityandresilienceofthreespecializedfarmingsystems
AT pytrikreidsma participatoryassessmentofsustainabilityandresilienceofthreespecializedfarmingsystems
_version_ 1718426931113754624