Cooperation patterns of members in networks during co-creation

Abstract Cooperation (i.e., co-creation) has become the principal way of carrying out creative activities in modern society. In co-creation, different participants can play two completely different roles based on two different behaviours: some participants are the originators who generate initial co...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Kunhao Yang, Itsuki Fujisaki, Kazuhiro Ueda
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/c795007af9c34ef78a5fc94f9ce801a6
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:c795007af9c34ef78a5fc94f9ce801a6
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:c795007af9c34ef78a5fc94f9ce801a62021-12-02T14:58:14ZCooperation patterns of members in networks during co-creation10.1038/s41598-021-90974-12045-2322https://doaj.org/article/c795007af9c34ef78a5fc94f9ce801a62021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90974-1https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Cooperation (i.e., co-creation) has become the principal way of carrying out creative activities in modern society. In co-creation, different participants can play two completely different roles based on two different behaviours: some participants are the originators who generate initial contents, while others are the revisors who provide revisions or coordination. In this study, we investigated different participants’ roles (i.e., the originator vs. the revisor) in co-creation and how these roles affected the final cooperation-group outcome. By using cooperation networks to represent cooperative relationships among participants, we found that peripheral members (i.e., those in the periphery of the cooperation networks) and core members (i.e., those in the centre of the cooperation networks) played the roles of originators and revisors, respectively, mainly affecting the quantity versus the quality of their creative outcomes. These results were robust across the three different datasets and the three different indicators defining core and peripheral members. Previous studies have considered cooperation behaviours to be homogeneous, ignoring that different participants may play different roles in co-creation. This study discusses patterns of cooperation among participants based on a model in which different roles in co-creation are considered. Thus, this research advances the understanding of how co-creation occurs in networks.Kunhao YangItsuki FujisakiKazuhiro UedaNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Kunhao Yang Itsuki Fujisaki Kazuhiro Ueda Cooperation patterns of members in networks during co-creation
description	Abstract Cooperation (i.e., co-creation) has become the principal way of carrying out creative activities in modern society. In co-creation, different participants can play two completely different roles based on two different behaviours: some participants are the originators who generate initial contents, while others are the revisors who provide revisions or coordination. In this study, we investigated different participants’ roles (i.e., the originator vs. the revisor) in co-creation and how these roles affected the final cooperation-group outcome. By using cooperation networks to represent cooperative relationships among participants, we found that peripheral members (i.e., those in the periphery of the cooperation networks) and core members (i.e., those in the centre of the cooperation networks) played the roles of originators and revisors, respectively, mainly affecting the quantity versus the quality of their creative outcomes. These results were robust across the three different datasets and the three different indicators defining core and peripheral members. Previous studies have considered cooperation behaviours to be homogeneous, ignoring that different participants may play different roles in co-creation. This study discusses patterns of cooperation among participants based on a model in which different roles in co-creation are considered. Thus, this research advances the understanding of how co-creation occurs in networks.
format	article
author	Kunhao Yang Itsuki Fujisaki Kazuhiro Ueda
author_facet	Kunhao Yang Itsuki Fujisaki Kazuhiro Ueda
author_sort	Kunhao Yang
title	Cooperation patterns of members in networks during co-creation
title_short	Cooperation patterns of members in networks during co-creation
title_full	Cooperation patterns of members in networks during co-creation
title_fullStr	Cooperation patterns of members in networks during co-creation
title_full_unstemmed	Cooperation patterns of members in networks during co-creation
title_sort	cooperation patterns of members in networks during co-creation
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/c795007af9c34ef78a5fc94f9ce801a6
work_keys_str_mv	AT kunhaoyang cooperationpatternsofmembersinnetworksduringcocreation AT itsukifujisaki cooperationpatternsofmembersinnetworksduringcocreation AT kazuhiroueda cooperationpatternsofmembersinnetworksduringcocreation
_version_	1718389348482678784

Cooperation patterns of members in networks during co-creation

Ejemplares similares