Forskningstraditioner krydser deres spor - Kvalitative og kvantitative socio-kulturelle empiriske forskningsmetoder

The article takes up the discussion about qualitative and quantitative research methods as ostensibly incopatible approaches to empirical studies - an understanding which is broadly disseminated within a range of academic disciplines. The authors trouble this dualistic understanding through concrete...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Inge Henningsen, Dorte Marie Søndergaard
Formato: article
Lenguaje:DA
EN
NB
SV
Publicado: The Royal Danish Library 2000
Materias:
H
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c79f7103afc74a3caa09d9e32502a7cc
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c79f7103afc74a3caa09d9e32502a7cc
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c79f7103afc74a3caa09d9e32502a7cc2021-12-01T00:10:48ZForskningstraditioner krydser deres spor - Kvalitative og kvantitative socio-kulturelle empiriske forskningsmetoder10.7146/kkf.v0i4.283852245-6937https://doaj.org/article/c79f7103afc74a3caa09d9e32502a7cc2000-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://tidsskrift.dk/KKF/article/view/28385https://doaj.org/toc/2245-6937The article takes up the discussion about qualitative and quantitative research methods as ostensibly incopatible approaches to empirical studies - an understanding which is broadly disseminated within a range of academic disciplines. The authors trouble this dualistic understanding through concrete discussions of methodological approaches conducted by as well qualitatively as quantitatively oriented reseachers. It is argued, that difference and potential incompatibility must be seen in relation to the metatheoretical basis for the studies and thereby in relation to the research ambitions, in which the studies are involved.Inge HenningsenDorte Marie SøndergaardThe Royal Danish LibraryarticleSocial SciencesHDAENNBSVKvinder, Køn & Forskning, Iss 4 (2000)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language DA
EN
NB
SV
topic Social Sciences
H
spellingShingle Social Sciences
H
Inge Henningsen
Dorte Marie Søndergaard
Forskningstraditioner krydser deres spor - Kvalitative og kvantitative socio-kulturelle empiriske forskningsmetoder
description The article takes up the discussion about qualitative and quantitative research methods as ostensibly incopatible approaches to empirical studies - an understanding which is broadly disseminated within a range of academic disciplines. The authors trouble this dualistic understanding through concrete discussions of methodological approaches conducted by as well qualitatively as quantitatively oriented reseachers. It is argued, that difference and potential incompatibility must be seen in relation to the metatheoretical basis for the studies and thereby in relation to the research ambitions, in which the studies are involved.
format article
author Inge Henningsen
Dorte Marie Søndergaard
author_facet Inge Henningsen
Dorte Marie Søndergaard
author_sort Inge Henningsen
title Forskningstraditioner krydser deres spor - Kvalitative og kvantitative socio-kulturelle empiriske forskningsmetoder
title_short Forskningstraditioner krydser deres spor - Kvalitative og kvantitative socio-kulturelle empiriske forskningsmetoder
title_full Forskningstraditioner krydser deres spor - Kvalitative og kvantitative socio-kulturelle empiriske forskningsmetoder
title_fullStr Forskningstraditioner krydser deres spor - Kvalitative og kvantitative socio-kulturelle empiriske forskningsmetoder
title_full_unstemmed Forskningstraditioner krydser deres spor - Kvalitative og kvantitative socio-kulturelle empiriske forskningsmetoder
title_sort forskningstraditioner krydser deres spor - kvalitative og kvantitative socio-kulturelle empiriske forskningsmetoder
publisher The Royal Danish Library
publishDate 2000
url https://doaj.org/article/c79f7103afc74a3caa09d9e32502a7cc
work_keys_str_mv AT ingehenningsen forskningstraditionerkrydserderessporkvalitativeogkvantitativesociokulturelleempiriskeforskningsmetoder
AT dortemariesøndergaard forskningstraditionerkrydserderessporkvalitativeogkvantitativesociokulturelleempiriskeforskningsmetoder
_version_ 1718406046808014848