The SARS-CoV-2 viral load in COVID-19 patients is lower on face mask filters than on nasopharyngeal swabs

The SARS-CoV-2 viral load in COVID-19 patients is lower on face mask filters than on nasopharyngeal swabs

Abstract Face masks and personal respirators are used to curb the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in respiratory droplets; filters embedded in some personal protective equipment could be used as a non-invasive sample source for applications, including at-home testing, but information is needed about whet...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agnieszka Smolinska, David S. Jessop, Kirk L. Pappan, Alexandra De Saedeleer, Amerjit Kang, Alexandra L. Martin, Max Allsworth, Charlotte Tyson, Martine P. Bos, Matt Clancy, Mike Morel, Tony Cooke, Tom Dymond, Claire Harris, Jacqui Galloway, Paul Bresser, Nynke Dijkstra, Viresh Jagesar, Paul H. M. Savelkoul, Erik V. H. Beuken, Wesley H. V. Nix, Renaud Louis, Muriel Delvaux, Doriane Calmes, Benoit Ernst, Simona Pollini, Anna Peired, Julien Guiot, Sara Tomassetti, Andries E. Budding, Frank McCaughan, Stefan J. Marciniak, Marc P. van der Schee
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
Medicine
R
Science
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c7a37bd15abe4d6ea9dd142068663970
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:Abstract Face masks and personal respirators are used to curb the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in respiratory droplets; filters embedded in some personal protective equipment could be used as a non-invasive sample source for applications, including at-home testing, but information is needed about whether filters are suited to capture viral particles for SARS-CoV-2 detection. In this study, we generated inactivated virus-laden aerosols of 0.3–2 microns in diameter (0.9 µm mean diameter by mass) and dispersed the aerosolized viral particles onto electrostatic face mask filters. The limit of detection for inactivated coronaviruses SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV-NL63 extracted from filters was between 10 to 100 copies/filter for both viruses. Testing for SARS-CoV-2, using face mask filters and nasopharyngeal swabs collected from hospitalized COVID-19-patients, showed that filter samples offered reduced sensitivity (8.5% compared to nasopharyngeal swabs). The low concordance of SARS-CoV-2 detection between filters and nasopharyngeal swabs indicated that number of viral particles collected on the face mask filter was below the limit of detection for all patients but those with the highest viral loads. This indicated face masks are unsuitable to replace diagnostic nasopharyngeal swabs in COVID-19 diagnosis. The ability to detect nucleic acids on face mask filters may, however, find other uses worth future investigation.

Ejemplares similares