Provider anticipation and experience of patient reaction when deprescribing guideline discordant inhaled corticosteroids.

<h4>Introduction</h4>Despite evidence of possible patient harm and substantial costs, medication overuse is persistent. Patient reaction is one potential barrier to deprescribing, but little research has assessed this in specific instances of medication discontinuation. We sought to unde...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toral J Parikh, Krysttel C Stryczek, Chris Gillespie, George G Sayre, Laura Feemster, Edmunds Udris, Barbara Majerczyk, Seppo T Rinne, Renda Soylemez Wiener, David H Au, Christian D Helfrich
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c7c6335a330a4bc196aa3b67aadcaa5b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c7c6335a330a4bc196aa3b67aadcaa5b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c7c6335a330a4bc196aa3b67aadcaa5b2021-12-02T20:07:21ZProvider anticipation and experience of patient reaction when deprescribing guideline discordant inhaled corticosteroids.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0238511https://doaj.org/article/c7c6335a330a4bc196aa3b67aadcaa5b2020-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238511https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Introduction</h4>Despite evidence of possible patient harm and substantial costs, medication overuse is persistent. Patient reaction is one potential barrier to deprescribing, but little research has assessed this in specific instances of medication discontinuation. We sought to understand Veteran and provider experience when de-implementing guideline-discordant use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in those with mild-to-moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).<h4>Methods</h4>We conducted a mixed-methods analysis in a provider-randomized quality improvement project testing a proactive electronic-consultation from pulmonologists recommending ICS discontinuation when appropriate. PCPs at two Veterans Health Administration healthcare systems were included. We completed interviews with 16 unexposed providers and 6 intervention-exposed providers. We interviewed 9 patients within 3 months after their PCP proposed ICS discontinuation. We conducted inductive and deductive content analysis of qualitative data to explore an emergent theme of patient reaction. Forty-eight PCPs returned surveys (24 exposed and 24 unexposed, response rate: 35%).<h4>Results</h4>The unexposed providers anticipated their patients might resist ICS discontinuation because it seems counterintuitive to stop something that is working, patient's fear of worsening symptoms, or if the prescription was initiated by another provider. Intervention-exposed providers reported similar experiences in post-intervention interviews. Unexposed providers anticipated that patients may accept ICS discontinuation, citing tactical use of patient-centered care strategies. This was echoed by intervention-exposed providers who had successfully discontinued an ICS. Veterans reported acceding to their providers out of trust or deference to their advanced training, even after describing an ICS as a 'security blanket'. Our survey findings supported the subthemes from our interviews. Among providers who proposed discontinuation of an ICS, 76% reported that they were able to discontinue it or switch to another more appropriate medication.<h4>Conclusions</h4>While PCPs anticipated that patients would resist discontinuing an ICS, interviews with patient and intervention-exposed PCPs along with surveys suggest that patients were receptive to this change.Toral J ParikhKrysttel C StryczekChris GillespieGeorge G SayreLaura FeemsterEdmunds UdrisBarbara MajerczykSeppo T RinneRenda Soylemez WienerDavid H AuChristian D HelfrichPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 15, Iss 9, p e0238511 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Toral J Parikh
Krysttel C Stryczek
Chris Gillespie
George G Sayre
Laura Feemster
Edmunds Udris
Barbara Majerczyk
Seppo T Rinne
Renda Soylemez Wiener
David H Au
Christian D Helfrich
Provider anticipation and experience of patient reaction when deprescribing guideline discordant inhaled corticosteroids.
description <h4>Introduction</h4>Despite evidence of possible patient harm and substantial costs, medication overuse is persistent. Patient reaction is one potential barrier to deprescribing, but little research has assessed this in specific instances of medication discontinuation. We sought to understand Veteran and provider experience when de-implementing guideline-discordant use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in those with mild-to-moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).<h4>Methods</h4>We conducted a mixed-methods analysis in a provider-randomized quality improvement project testing a proactive electronic-consultation from pulmonologists recommending ICS discontinuation when appropriate. PCPs at two Veterans Health Administration healthcare systems were included. We completed interviews with 16 unexposed providers and 6 intervention-exposed providers. We interviewed 9 patients within 3 months after their PCP proposed ICS discontinuation. We conducted inductive and deductive content analysis of qualitative data to explore an emergent theme of patient reaction. Forty-eight PCPs returned surveys (24 exposed and 24 unexposed, response rate: 35%).<h4>Results</h4>The unexposed providers anticipated their patients might resist ICS discontinuation because it seems counterintuitive to stop something that is working, patient's fear of worsening symptoms, or if the prescription was initiated by another provider. Intervention-exposed providers reported similar experiences in post-intervention interviews. Unexposed providers anticipated that patients may accept ICS discontinuation, citing tactical use of patient-centered care strategies. This was echoed by intervention-exposed providers who had successfully discontinued an ICS. Veterans reported acceding to their providers out of trust or deference to their advanced training, even after describing an ICS as a 'security blanket'. Our survey findings supported the subthemes from our interviews. Among providers who proposed discontinuation of an ICS, 76% reported that they were able to discontinue it or switch to another more appropriate medication.<h4>Conclusions</h4>While PCPs anticipated that patients would resist discontinuing an ICS, interviews with patient and intervention-exposed PCPs along with surveys suggest that patients were receptive to this change.
format article
author Toral J Parikh
Krysttel C Stryczek
Chris Gillespie
George G Sayre
Laura Feemster
Edmunds Udris
Barbara Majerczyk
Seppo T Rinne
Renda Soylemez Wiener
David H Au
Christian D Helfrich
author_facet Toral J Parikh
Krysttel C Stryczek
Chris Gillespie
George G Sayre
Laura Feemster
Edmunds Udris
Barbara Majerczyk
Seppo T Rinne
Renda Soylemez Wiener
David H Au
Christian D Helfrich
author_sort Toral J Parikh
title Provider anticipation and experience of patient reaction when deprescribing guideline discordant inhaled corticosteroids.
title_short Provider anticipation and experience of patient reaction when deprescribing guideline discordant inhaled corticosteroids.
title_full Provider anticipation and experience of patient reaction when deprescribing guideline discordant inhaled corticosteroids.
title_fullStr Provider anticipation and experience of patient reaction when deprescribing guideline discordant inhaled corticosteroids.
title_full_unstemmed Provider anticipation and experience of patient reaction when deprescribing guideline discordant inhaled corticosteroids.
title_sort provider anticipation and experience of patient reaction when deprescribing guideline discordant inhaled corticosteroids.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/c7c6335a330a4bc196aa3b67aadcaa5b
work_keys_str_mv AT toraljparikh provideranticipationandexperienceofpatientreactionwhendeprescribingguidelinediscordantinhaledcorticosteroids
AT krysttelcstryczek provideranticipationandexperienceofpatientreactionwhendeprescribingguidelinediscordantinhaledcorticosteroids
AT chrisgillespie provideranticipationandexperienceofpatientreactionwhendeprescribingguidelinediscordantinhaledcorticosteroids
AT georgegsayre provideranticipationandexperienceofpatientreactionwhendeprescribingguidelinediscordantinhaledcorticosteroids
AT laurafeemster provideranticipationandexperienceofpatientreactionwhendeprescribingguidelinediscordantinhaledcorticosteroids
AT edmundsudris provideranticipationandexperienceofpatientreactionwhendeprescribingguidelinediscordantinhaledcorticosteroids
AT barbaramajerczyk provideranticipationandexperienceofpatientreactionwhendeprescribingguidelinediscordantinhaledcorticosteroids
AT seppotrinne provideranticipationandexperienceofpatientreactionwhendeprescribingguidelinediscordantinhaledcorticosteroids
AT rendasoylemezwiener provideranticipationandexperienceofpatientreactionwhendeprescribingguidelinediscordantinhaledcorticosteroids
AT davidhau provideranticipationandexperienceofpatientreactionwhendeprescribingguidelinediscordantinhaledcorticosteroids
AT christiandhelfrich provideranticipationandexperienceofpatientreactionwhendeprescribingguidelinediscordantinhaledcorticosteroids
_version_ 1718375327935234048