International investment liberalization, transnational corporations and NCD prevention policy non-decisions: a realist review on the political economy of tobacco, alcohol and ultra-processed food

Abstract Background Public health concerns relating to international investment liberalization have centred on the potential for investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS)-related regulatory chill. However, the broader political and economic dimensions that shape the relationship between the internati...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Penelope Milsom, Richard Smith, Phillip Baker, Helen Walls
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMC 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c8164cd21d49440abe44b3a8a5e87e6e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c8164cd21d49440abe44b3a8a5e87e6e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c8164cd21d49440abe44b3a8a5e87e6e2021-11-28T12:28:00ZInternational investment liberalization, transnational corporations and NCD prevention policy non-decisions: a realist review on the political economy of tobacco, alcohol and ultra-processed food10.1186/s12992-021-00784-31744-8603https://doaj.org/article/c8164cd21d49440abe44b3a8a5e87e6e2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-021-00784-3https://doaj.org/toc/1744-8603Abstract Background Public health concerns relating to international investment liberalization have centred on the potential for investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS)-related regulatory chill. However, the broader political and economic dimensions that shape the relationship between the international investment regime and non-communicable disease (NCD) policy development have been less well explored. This review aimed to synthesise the available evidence using a political economy approach, to understand why, how and under what conditions transnational corporations may use the international investment regime to promote NCD prevention policy non-decisions. Main body Methods: Mechanisms explaining why/how the international investment regime may be used by transnational health-harmful commodity corporations (THCCs) to encourage NCD prevention policy non-decisions, including regulatory chill, were iteratively developed. Six databases and relevant grey literature was searched, and evidence was extracted, synthesized and mapped against the various proposed explanatory mechanisms. Findings: Eighty-nine sources were included. THCCs may be incentivised to use the ISDS mechanism since the costs may be outweighed by the benefits of even just delaying regulatory adoption, particularly since the chilling effect tends to ripple out across jurisdictions. Drivers of regulatory chill may include ambiguity in treaty terms, inconsistency in arbitral rulings, potential arbitrator bias and the high cost of arbitration. Evidence indicates ISDS can delay policy adoption both within the country directly involved but also in other jurisdictions. Additionally, governments are adopting standard assessments of public health regulatory proposals for trade and ISDS risk. Various economic, political and industry-related factors likely interact to increase (or decrease) the ultimate risk of regulatory chill. Some evidence indicates that THCCs take advantage of governments’ prioritization of foreign investment over NCD prevention objectives to influence the NCD prevention regulatory environment. Conclusions While ISDS-related regulatory chill is a real risk under certain conditions, international investment-related NCD prevention policy non-decisions driven by broader political economy dynamics may well be more widespread and impactful on NCD regulatory environments. There is therefore a clear need to expand the research agenda on investment liberalization and NCD policy beyond regulatory chill and engage with theories and approaches from international relations and political science, including political economy and power analyses.Penelope MilsomRichard SmithPhillip BakerHelen WallsBMCarticleInvestment liberalizationForeign investmentNon-communicable diseasesRegulatory chillPolitical economy of healthPublic aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENGlobalization and Health, Vol 17, Iss 1, Pp 1-19 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Investment liberalization
Foreign investment
Non-communicable diseases
Regulatory chill
Political economy of health
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
spellingShingle Investment liberalization
Foreign investment
Non-communicable diseases
Regulatory chill
Political economy of health
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Penelope Milsom
Richard Smith
Phillip Baker
Helen Walls
International investment liberalization, transnational corporations and NCD prevention policy non-decisions: a realist review on the political economy of tobacco, alcohol and ultra-processed food
description Abstract Background Public health concerns relating to international investment liberalization have centred on the potential for investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS)-related regulatory chill. However, the broader political and economic dimensions that shape the relationship between the international investment regime and non-communicable disease (NCD) policy development have been less well explored. This review aimed to synthesise the available evidence using a political economy approach, to understand why, how and under what conditions transnational corporations may use the international investment regime to promote NCD prevention policy non-decisions. Main body Methods: Mechanisms explaining why/how the international investment regime may be used by transnational health-harmful commodity corporations (THCCs) to encourage NCD prevention policy non-decisions, including regulatory chill, were iteratively developed. Six databases and relevant grey literature was searched, and evidence was extracted, synthesized and mapped against the various proposed explanatory mechanisms. Findings: Eighty-nine sources were included. THCCs may be incentivised to use the ISDS mechanism since the costs may be outweighed by the benefits of even just delaying regulatory adoption, particularly since the chilling effect tends to ripple out across jurisdictions. Drivers of regulatory chill may include ambiguity in treaty terms, inconsistency in arbitral rulings, potential arbitrator bias and the high cost of arbitration. Evidence indicates ISDS can delay policy adoption both within the country directly involved but also in other jurisdictions. Additionally, governments are adopting standard assessments of public health regulatory proposals for trade and ISDS risk. Various economic, political and industry-related factors likely interact to increase (or decrease) the ultimate risk of regulatory chill. Some evidence indicates that THCCs take advantage of governments’ prioritization of foreign investment over NCD prevention objectives to influence the NCD prevention regulatory environment. Conclusions While ISDS-related regulatory chill is a real risk under certain conditions, international investment-related NCD prevention policy non-decisions driven by broader political economy dynamics may well be more widespread and impactful on NCD regulatory environments. There is therefore a clear need to expand the research agenda on investment liberalization and NCD policy beyond regulatory chill and engage with theories and approaches from international relations and political science, including political economy and power analyses.
format article
author Penelope Milsom
Richard Smith
Phillip Baker
Helen Walls
author_facet Penelope Milsom
Richard Smith
Phillip Baker
Helen Walls
author_sort Penelope Milsom
title International investment liberalization, transnational corporations and NCD prevention policy non-decisions: a realist review on the political economy of tobacco, alcohol and ultra-processed food
title_short International investment liberalization, transnational corporations and NCD prevention policy non-decisions: a realist review on the political economy of tobacco, alcohol and ultra-processed food
title_full International investment liberalization, transnational corporations and NCD prevention policy non-decisions: a realist review on the political economy of tobacco, alcohol and ultra-processed food
title_fullStr International investment liberalization, transnational corporations and NCD prevention policy non-decisions: a realist review on the political economy of tobacco, alcohol and ultra-processed food
title_full_unstemmed International investment liberalization, transnational corporations and NCD prevention policy non-decisions: a realist review on the political economy of tobacco, alcohol and ultra-processed food
title_sort international investment liberalization, transnational corporations and ncd prevention policy non-decisions: a realist review on the political economy of tobacco, alcohol and ultra-processed food
publisher BMC
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/c8164cd21d49440abe44b3a8a5e87e6e
work_keys_str_mv AT penelopemilsom internationalinvestmentliberalizationtransnationalcorporationsandncdpreventionpolicynondecisionsarealistreviewonthepoliticaleconomyoftobaccoalcoholandultraprocessedfood
AT richardsmith internationalinvestmentliberalizationtransnationalcorporationsandncdpreventionpolicynondecisionsarealistreviewonthepoliticaleconomyoftobaccoalcoholandultraprocessedfood
AT phillipbaker internationalinvestmentliberalizationtransnationalcorporationsandncdpreventionpolicynondecisionsarealistreviewonthepoliticaleconomyoftobaccoalcoholandultraprocessedfood
AT helenwalls internationalinvestmentliberalizationtransnationalcorporationsandncdpreventionpolicynondecisionsarealistreviewonthepoliticaleconomyoftobaccoalcoholandultraprocessedfood
_version_ 1718407982133280768