A comparison of two methods for classifying trajectories: a case study on neighborhood poverty at the intra-metropolitan level in Montreal

In recent years several studies have examined changes in the distribution of poverty in the North American cities, with most empirical work assessing neighborhood change between two time points. This paper aims to make a methodological contribution to the study of neighborhood change, by comparing t...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Philippe Apparicio, Mylène Riva, Anne-Marie Séguin
Formato: article
Lenguaje:DE
EN
FR
IT
PT
Publicado: Unité Mixte de Recherche 8504 Géographie-cités 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c822b85e968f4dd7b9a14dbd351d9e8f
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c822b85e968f4dd7b9a14dbd351d9e8f
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c822b85e968f4dd7b9a14dbd351d9e8f2021-12-02T11:08:32ZA comparison of two methods for classifying trajectories: a case study on neighborhood poverty at the intra-metropolitan level in Montreal1278-336610.4000/cybergeo.27035https://doaj.org/article/c822b85e968f4dd7b9a14dbd351d9e8f2015-06-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journals.openedition.org/cybergeo/27035https://doaj.org/toc/1278-3366In recent years several studies have examined changes in the distribution of poverty in the North American cities, with most empirical work assessing neighborhood change between two time points. This paper aims to make a methodological contribution to the study of neighborhood change, by comparing two classification methods, one classical (k-means clustering) the other more novel (Latent Class Growth Modelling; LCGM) to identify groups of census tracts having followed similar trajectories of poverty in the Montreal metropolitan area, Canada. Here trajectories of poverty are measured over a twenty-year period, using five time points. The relative performance of the LCGM vs. the k-means clustering was assessed using a series of multinomial logistic regressions examining how different socioeconomic variables were associated with the trajectories of poverty. Results showed that k-means and LCGM identified similar groups of census tracts characterized by ascending, descending, or stable poverty levels throughout the period, with LGCM only marginally outperforming k-means clustering.Philippe ApparicioMylène RivaAnne-Marie SéguinUnité Mixte de Recherche 8504 Géographie-citésarticlelatent class growth modeling/modellingk-meansclusteringneighborhood/neighbourhoodpovertytrajectoriesGeography (General)G1-922DEENFRITPTCybergeo (2015)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language DE
EN
FR
IT
PT
topic latent class growth modeling/modelling
k-means
clustering
neighborhood/neighbourhood
poverty
trajectories
Geography (General)
G1-922
spellingShingle latent class growth modeling/modelling
k-means
clustering
neighborhood/neighbourhood
poverty
trajectories
Geography (General)
G1-922
Philippe Apparicio
Mylène Riva
Anne-Marie Séguin
A comparison of two methods for classifying trajectories: a case study on neighborhood poverty at the intra-metropolitan level in Montreal
description In recent years several studies have examined changes in the distribution of poverty in the North American cities, with most empirical work assessing neighborhood change between two time points. This paper aims to make a methodological contribution to the study of neighborhood change, by comparing two classification methods, one classical (k-means clustering) the other more novel (Latent Class Growth Modelling; LCGM) to identify groups of census tracts having followed similar trajectories of poverty in the Montreal metropolitan area, Canada. Here trajectories of poverty are measured over a twenty-year period, using five time points. The relative performance of the LCGM vs. the k-means clustering was assessed using a series of multinomial logistic regressions examining how different socioeconomic variables were associated with the trajectories of poverty. Results showed that k-means and LCGM identified similar groups of census tracts characterized by ascending, descending, or stable poverty levels throughout the period, with LGCM only marginally outperforming k-means clustering.
format article
author Philippe Apparicio
Mylène Riva
Anne-Marie Séguin
author_facet Philippe Apparicio
Mylène Riva
Anne-Marie Séguin
author_sort Philippe Apparicio
title A comparison of two methods for classifying trajectories: a case study on neighborhood poverty at the intra-metropolitan level in Montreal
title_short A comparison of two methods for classifying trajectories: a case study on neighborhood poverty at the intra-metropolitan level in Montreal
title_full A comparison of two methods for classifying trajectories: a case study on neighborhood poverty at the intra-metropolitan level in Montreal
title_fullStr A comparison of two methods for classifying trajectories: a case study on neighborhood poverty at the intra-metropolitan level in Montreal
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of two methods for classifying trajectories: a case study on neighborhood poverty at the intra-metropolitan level in Montreal
title_sort comparison of two methods for classifying trajectories: a case study on neighborhood poverty at the intra-metropolitan level in montreal
publisher Unité Mixte de Recherche 8504 Géographie-cités
publishDate 2015
url https://doaj.org/article/c822b85e968f4dd7b9a14dbd351d9e8f
work_keys_str_mv AT philippeapparicio acomparisonoftwomethodsforclassifyingtrajectoriesacasestudyonneighborhoodpovertyattheintrametropolitanlevelinmontreal
AT myleneriva acomparisonoftwomethodsforclassifyingtrajectoriesacasestudyonneighborhoodpovertyattheintrametropolitanlevelinmontreal
AT annemarieseguin acomparisonoftwomethodsforclassifyingtrajectoriesacasestudyonneighborhoodpovertyattheintrametropolitanlevelinmontreal
AT philippeapparicio comparisonoftwomethodsforclassifyingtrajectoriesacasestudyonneighborhoodpovertyattheintrametropolitanlevelinmontreal
AT myleneriva comparisonoftwomethodsforclassifyingtrajectoriesacasestudyonneighborhoodpovertyattheintrametropolitanlevelinmontreal
AT annemarieseguin comparisonoftwomethodsforclassifyingtrajectoriesacasestudyonneighborhoodpovertyattheintrametropolitanlevelinmontreal
_version_ 1718396250880999424