Developing an index of sustainable development goals for local governments: the case of Gyeonggi province in korea

This study aims to develop and evaluate the indicators of Sustainable Development Goals (hereafter SDGs) for local governments in Gyeonggi Province, South Korea from the perspective of the glocal mainstreaming of SDGs and localization. Through surveys and focus group meetings, 35 SDGs indicators tha...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Jaekyung Koh, Taewook Huh, Minji Ye
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Taylor & Francis Group 2021
Materias:	sustainable development goals localization local governments sdg index fuzzy set analysis Ecology QH540-549.5
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/c850b96dc593434f94db427815771821
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:c850b96dc593434f94db427815771821
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:c850b96dc593434f94db4278157718212021-11-04T15:00:43ZDeveloping an index of sustainable development goals for local governments: the case of Gyeonggi province in korea2096-41292332-887810.1080/20964129.2021.1980437https://doaj.org/article/c850b96dc593434f94db4278157718212021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2021.1980437https://doaj.org/toc/2096-4129https://doaj.org/toc/2332-8878This study aims to develop and evaluate the indicators of Sustainable Development Goals (hereafter SDGs) for local governments in Gyeonggi Province, South Korea from the perspective of the glocal mainstreaming of SDGs and localization. Through surveys and focus group meetings, 35 SDGs indicators that are to be implemented by both the Gyeonggi Provincial government and 31 separate local governments were selected and an overall index was calculated by standardizing 27 indicators. Through the comparative analysis of the fuzzy-set, this paper revealed the four ideal types along with the arrangement of two variables, the socio-economic SDGs index (S) and the environmental SDGs index (E), which are derived from 31 local governments. In short, some examples of this arrangement are the Type 1 (SE: “sustainable local gov.”) including Hanam City (fuzzy score, 0.729); Type 2 (Se: “imbalanced local gov.(I)”) including Hwaseong City (0.862); Type 3 (sE: “imbalanced local gov.(II)”) including Gapyeong County (0.922); and Type 4 (se: “unsustainable local gov.”) including Pyeongtaek City (0.650). As a result, this paper suggests policy priority should be placed on the local governments of Type 4 where all three dimensions of sustainable development pose challenges. Furthermore, it is important for Type 2 and Type 3 to enhance policy coherence for sustainability.Jaekyung KohTaewook HuhMinji YeTaylor & Francis Grouparticlesustainable development goalslocalizationlocal governmentssdg indexfuzzy set analysisEcologyQH540-549.5ENEcosystem Health and Sustainability, Vol 7, Iss 1 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	sustainable development goals localization local governments sdg index fuzzy set analysis Ecology QH540-549.5
spellingShingle	sustainable development goals localization local governments sdg index fuzzy set analysis Ecology QH540-549.5 Jaekyung Koh Taewook Huh Minji Ye Developing an index of sustainable development goals for local governments: the case of Gyeonggi province in korea
description	This study aims to develop and evaluate the indicators of Sustainable Development Goals (hereafter SDGs) for local governments in Gyeonggi Province, South Korea from the perspective of the glocal mainstreaming of SDGs and localization. Through surveys and focus group meetings, 35 SDGs indicators that are to be implemented by both the Gyeonggi Provincial government and 31 separate local governments were selected and an overall index was calculated by standardizing 27 indicators. Through the comparative analysis of the fuzzy-set, this paper revealed the four ideal types along with the arrangement of two variables, the socio-economic SDGs index (S) and the environmental SDGs index (E), which are derived from 31 local governments. In short, some examples of this arrangement are the Type 1 (SE: “sustainable local gov.”) including Hanam City (fuzzy score, 0.729); Type 2 (Se: “imbalanced local gov.(I)”) including Hwaseong City (0.862); Type 3 (sE: “imbalanced local gov.(II)”) including Gapyeong County (0.922); and Type 4 (se: “unsustainable local gov.”) including Pyeongtaek City (0.650). As a result, this paper suggests policy priority should be placed on the local governments of Type 4 where all three dimensions of sustainable development pose challenges. Furthermore, it is important for Type 2 and Type 3 to enhance policy coherence for sustainability.
format	article
author	Jaekyung Koh Taewook Huh Minji Ye
author_facet	Jaekyung Koh Taewook Huh Minji Ye
author_sort	Jaekyung Koh
title	Developing an index of sustainable development goals for local governments: the case of Gyeonggi province in korea
title_short	Developing an index of sustainable development goals for local governments: the case of Gyeonggi province in korea
title_full	Developing an index of sustainable development goals for local governments: the case of Gyeonggi province in korea
title_fullStr	Developing an index of sustainable development goals for local governments: the case of Gyeonggi province in korea
title_full_unstemmed	Developing an index of sustainable development goals for local governments: the case of Gyeonggi province in korea
title_sort	developing an index of sustainable development goals for local governments: the case of gyeonggi province in korea
publisher	Taylor & Francis Group
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/c850b96dc593434f94db427815771821
work_keys_str_mv	AT jaekyungkoh developinganindexofsustainabledevelopmentgoalsforlocalgovernmentsthecaseofgyeonggiprovinceinkorea AT taewookhuh developinganindexofsustainabledevelopmentgoalsforlocalgovernmentsthecaseofgyeonggiprovinceinkorea AT minjiye developinganindexofsustainabledevelopmentgoalsforlocalgovernmentsthecaseofgyeonggiprovinceinkorea
_version_	1718444798283612160

Developing an index of sustainable development goals for local governments: the case of Gyeonggi province in korea

Ejemplares similares