Circulating noncoding RNAs as early predictive biomarkers in preeclampsia: a diagnostic meta-analysis

Abstract Background We designed a meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical significance and efficacy of circulating noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) in the early prediction of preeclampsia. Methods PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were used to search for literature. The combined prediction performance w...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sha Su, Fang Yang, Linlin Zhong, Lihong Pang
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMC 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c87ef53c4f98419da057e86869b05bf2
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c87ef53c4f98419da057e86869b05bf2
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c87ef53c4f98419da057e86869b05bf22021-12-05T12:24:08ZCirculating noncoding RNAs as early predictive biomarkers in preeclampsia: a diagnostic meta-analysis10.1186/s12958-021-00852-81477-7827https://doaj.org/article/c87ef53c4f98419da057e86869b05bf22021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-021-00852-8https://doaj.org/toc/1477-7827Abstract Background We designed a meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical significance and efficacy of circulating noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) in the early prediction of preeclampsia. Methods PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were used to search for literature. The combined prediction performance was evaluated by calculating the area under the summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curve. The potential sources of heterogeneity were analysed by meta-regression analysis and subgroup analysis. All statistical analyses and mapping were performed by RevMan 5.3 and Stata 12.0. Results A total of 41 studies from 14 articles, including 557 preeclampsia patients and 842 controls, were included in our meta-analysis. All studies collected blood before onset. NcRNAs in blood performed relatively well in predicting preeclampsia. The combined sensitivity was 0.71, the specificity was 0.84, and the area under the SROC curve (AUC) was 0.86. Peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples showed the best diagnostic accuracy. The combined AUC was 0.93. Combined detection was better than single detection, and miRNA was better than circRNA. The heterogeneity of the study was determined by sample size, lncRNA characteristics, lncRNA source and race. Conclusion Circulating ncRNAs can be valuable biomarkers used as candidates for noninvasive early predictive biomarkers of preeclampsia and have great clinical application prospects. The clinical value of ncRNAs needs to be tested by further multicentre, comprehensive and prospective studies, and the test criteria should be established.Sha SuFang YangLinlin ZhongLihong PangBMCarticlencRNAsPreeclampsiaBiomarkersDiagnostic meta-analysisGynecology and obstetricsRG1-991ReproductionQH471-489ENReproductive Biology and Endocrinology, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic ncRNAs
Preeclampsia
Biomarkers
Diagnostic meta-analysis
Gynecology and obstetrics
RG1-991
Reproduction
QH471-489
spellingShingle ncRNAs
Preeclampsia
Biomarkers
Diagnostic meta-analysis
Gynecology and obstetrics
RG1-991
Reproduction
QH471-489
Sha Su
Fang Yang
Linlin Zhong
Lihong Pang
Circulating noncoding RNAs as early predictive biomarkers in preeclampsia: a diagnostic meta-analysis
description Abstract Background We designed a meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical significance and efficacy of circulating noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) in the early prediction of preeclampsia. Methods PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were used to search for literature. The combined prediction performance was evaluated by calculating the area under the summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curve. The potential sources of heterogeneity were analysed by meta-regression analysis and subgroup analysis. All statistical analyses and mapping were performed by RevMan 5.3 and Stata 12.0. Results A total of 41 studies from 14 articles, including 557 preeclampsia patients and 842 controls, were included in our meta-analysis. All studies collected blood before onset. NcRNAs in blood performed relatively well in predicting preeclampsia. The combined sensitivity was 0.71, the specificity was 0.84, and the area under the SROC curve (AUC) was 0.86. Peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples showed the best diagnostic accuracy. The combined AUC was 0.93. Combined detection was better than single detection, and miRNA was better than circRNA. The heterogeneity of the study was determined by sample size, lncRNA characteristics, lncRNA source and race. Conclusion Circulating ncRNAs can be valuable biomarkers used as candidates for noninvasive early predictive biomarkers of preeclampsia and have great clinical application prospects. The clinical value of ncRNAs needs to be tested by further multicentre, comprehensive and prospective studies, and the test criteria should be established.
format article
author Sha Su
Fang Yang
Linlin Zhong
Lihong Pang
author_facet Sha Su
Fang Yang
Linlin Zhong
Lihong Pang
author_sort Sha Su
title Circulating noncoding RNAs as early predictive biomarkers in preeclampsia: a diagnostic meta-analysis
title_short Circulating noncoding RNAs as early predictive biomarkers in preeclampsia: a diagnostic meta-analysis
title_full Circulating noncoding RNAs as early predictive biomarkers in preeclampsia: a diagnostic meta-analysis
title_fullStr Circulating noncoding RNAs as early predictive biomarkers in preeclampsia: a diagnostic meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Circulating noncoding RNAs as early predictive biomarkers in preeclampsia: a diagnostic meta-analysis
title_sort circulating noncoding rnas as early predictive biomarkers in preeclampsia: a diagnostic meta-analysis
publisher BMC
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/c87ef53c4f98419da057e86869b05bf2
work_keys_str_mv AT shasu circulatingnoncodingrnasasearlypredictivebiomarkersinpreeclampsiaadiagnosticmetaanalysis
AT fangyang circulatingnoncodingrnasasearlypredictivebiomarkersinpreeclampsiaadiagnosticmetaanalysis
AT linlinzhong circulatingnoncodingrnasasearlypredictivebiomarkersinpreeclampsiaadiagnosticmetaanalysis
AT lihongpang circulatingnoncodingrnasasearlypredictivebiomarkersinpreeclampsiaadiagnosticmetaanalysis
_version_ 1718371984834822144