Clinical Relevance and Advantages of Intradermal Test Results in 371 Patients with Allergic Rhinitis, Asthma and/or Otitis Media with Effusion

Background: We evaluated the value of positive intradermal dilution testing (IDT) after negative skin prick tests (SPT) by retrospectively determining allergy immunotherapy (AIT) outcomes. Methods: This private practice, cohort study compared the relative value of SPT vs. IDT in 371 adults and child...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: David S. Hurst, Alan B. McDaniel
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c88b3aa75eec40a3bcfba00273361e7f
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c88b3aa75eec40a3bcfba00273361e7f
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c88b3aa75eec40a3bcfba00273361e7f2021-11-25T17:13:03ZClinical Relevance and Advantages of Intradermal Test Results in 371 Patients with Allergic Rhinitis, Asthma and/or Otitis Media with Effusion10.3390/cells101132242073-4409https://doaj.org/article/c88b3aa75eec40a3bcfba00273361e7f2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/10/11/3224https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4409Background: We evaluated the value of positive intradermal dilution testing (IDT) after negative skin prick tests (SPT) by retrospectively determining allergy immunotherapy (AIT) outcomes. Methods: This private practice, cohort study compared the relative value of SPT vs. IDT in 371 adults and children with suspected manifestations of allergy: chronic allergic rhinitis (AR), asthma and/or chronic otitis media with effusion (OME). The primary outcome measure was symptom resolution following immunotherapy, as determined by symptom severity questionnaires completed by patients before and after AIT. Results: Positive IDT identified 193 (52%) patients who would not otherwise have been diagnosed. IDT detected 3.7-fold more allergens per patient than SPT (8.56 vs. 2.3; <i>p</i> < 0.01). Patients positive only on IDT responded to AIT equally well as those identifiable by SPT, independent of allergen sensitivity (67% by SPT vs. 62% by IDT; <i>p</i> = 0.69, not significantly different). Conclusion: Intradermal titration can identify patients who will benefit from allergy immunotherapy more accurately than SPT. Outcomes analysis in 371 patients shows that IDT doubled their chance of successful treatment with no greater risk of therapeutic failure. Positive IDT, following negative SPT, is clinically relevant and offers superior sensitivity over SPT for detecting allergens clinically relevant to diagnosis of AIT-responsive atopic disease.David S. HurstAlan B. McDanielMDPI AGarticleallergic rhinitisallergensallergy immunotherapyasthmaotitis mediasinusitisBiology (General)QH301-705.5ENCells, Vol 10, Iss 3224, p 3224 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic allergic rhinitis
allergens
allergy immunotherapy
asthma
otitis media
sinusitis
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
spellingShingle allergic rhinitis
allergens
allergy immunotherapy
asthma
otitis media
sinusitis
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
David S. Hurst
Alan B. McDaniel
Clinical Relevance and Advantages of Intradermal Test Results in 371 Patients with Allergic Rhinitis, Asthma and/or Otitis Media with Effusion
description Background: We evaluated the value of positive intradermal dilution testing (IDT) after negative skin prick tests (SPT) by retrospectively determining allergy immunotherapy (AIT) outcomes. Methods: This private practice, cohort study compared the relative value of SPT vs. IDT in 371 adults and children with suspected manifestations of allergy: chronic allergic rhinitis (AR), asthma and/or chronic otitis media with effusion (OME). The primary outcome measure was symptom resolution following immunotherapy, as determined by symptom severity questionnaires completed by patients before and after AIT. Results: Positive IDT identified 193 (52%) patients who would not otherwise have been diagnosed. IDT detected 3.7-fold more allergens per patient than SPT (8.56 vs. 2.3; <i>p</i> < 0.01). Patients positive only on IDT responded to AIT equally well as those identifiable by SPT, independent of allergen sensitivity (67% by SPT vs. 62% by IDT; <i>p</i> = 0.69, not significantly different). Conclusion: Intradermal titration can identify patients who will benefit from allergy immunotherapy more accurately than SPT. Outcomes analysis in 371 patients shows that IDT doubled their chance of successful treatment with no greater risk of therapeutic failure. Positive IDT, following negative SPT, is clinically relevant and offers superior sensitivity over SPT for detecting allergens clinically relevant to diagnosis of AIT-responsive atopic disease.
format article
author David S. Hurst
Alan B. McDaniel
author_facet David S. Hurst
Alan B. McDaniel
author_sort David S. Hurst
title Clinical Relevance and Advantages of Intradermal Test Results in 371 Patients with Allergic Rhinitis, Asthma and/or Otitis Media with Effusion
title_short Clinical Relevance and Advantages of Intradermal Test Results in 371 Patients with Allergic Rhinitis, Asthma and/or Otitis Media with Effusion
title_full Clinical Relevance and Advantages of Intradermal Test Results in 371 Patients with Allergic Rhinitis, Asthma and/or Otitis Media with Effusion
title_fullStr Clinical Relevance and Advantages of Intradermal Test Results in 371 Patients with Allergic Rhinitis, Asthma and/or Otitis Media with Effusion
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Relevance and Advantages of Intradermal Test Results in 371 Patients with Allergic Rhinitis, Asthma and/or Otitis Media with Effusion
title_sort clinical relevance and advantages of intradermal test results in 371 patients with allergic rhinitis, asthma and/or otitis media with effusion
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/c88b3aa75eec40a3bcfba00273361e7f
work_keys_str_mv AT davidshurst clinicalrelevanceandadvantagesofintradermaltestresultsin371patientswithallergicrhinitisasthmaandorotitismediawitheffusion
AT alanbmcdaniel clinicalrelevanceandadvantagesofintradermaltestresultsin371patientswithallergicrhinitisasthmaandorotitismediawitheffusion
_version_ 1718412617794453504