“Human rights” in dispute: State violence and demands for justice in a comparative perspective

This paper proposes a reflection on the “human rights” category, as a native category, endowed with local and specific meanings. Therefore, it utilizes a comparative perspective by contrast on the uses and meanings of the “state violence” category and the building of processes demanding justice in R...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Lucia Eilbaum
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN ES EU FR PT
Publicado:	Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law 2021
Materias:	human rights state violence demands for justice ethnography derechos humanos violencia de estado demandas por justicia etnografía Social legislation K7585-7595
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/c8cb4f43318546b5bedb4037a8708fad
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:c8cb4f43318546b5bedb4037a8708fad
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:c8cb4f43318546b5bedb4037a8708fad2021-12-01T08:40:33Z“Human rights” in dispute: State violence and demands for justice in a comparative perspective2079-5971https://doaj.org/article/c8cb4f43318546b5bedb4037a8708fad2021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/view/1230https://doaj.org/toc/2079-5971This paper proposes a reflection on the “human rights” category, as a native category, endowed with local and specific meanings. Therefore, it utilizes a comparative perspective by contrast on the uses and meanings of the “state violence” category and the building of processes demanding justice in Rio de Janeiro, in comparison to Buenos Aires. Specifically, it focuses on the ethnography produced after the murder of Rio's alderwoman Marielle Franco, to propose the notion of “attack on human rights”, showing how the category has been built through an antagonistic logic in Rio de Janeiro. Este artículo propone una reflexión sobre la categoría “derechos humanos” en cuanto categoría nativa, dotada de sentidos locales y particulares. Para ello, se vale de una perspectiva comparada sobre los usos y sentidos de la categoría violencia de estado y sobre la construcción de los procesos de demanda por justicia en Brasil en contraste con Buenos Aires. Específicamente, se detiene en la etnografía producida a partir del asesinato de la concejala carioca Marielle Franco para proponer la noción de “embate a los derechos humanos”, demostrando cómo la categoría, en Río de Janeiro, se ha ido construyendo a través de una lógica antagónica. Available from: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1182Lucia EilbaumOñati International Institute for the Sociology of Lawarticlehuman rightsstate violencedemands for justiceethnographyderechos humanosviolencia de estadodemandas por justiciaetnografíaSocial legislationK7585-7595ENESEUFRPTOñati Socio-Legal Series, Vol 11, Iss 6, Pp 1292-1310 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN ES EU FR PT
topic	human rights state violence demands for justice ethnography derechos humanos violencia de estado demandas por justicia etnografía Social legislation K7585-7595
spellingShingle	human rights state violence demands for justice ethnography derechos humanos violencia de estado demandas por justicia etnografía Social legislation K7585-7595 Lucia Eilbaum “Human rights” in dispute: State violence and demands for justice in a comparative perspective
description	This paper proposes a reflection on the “human rights” category, as a native category, endowed with local and specific meanings. Therefore, it utilizes a comparative perspective by contrast on the uses and meanings of the “state violence” category and the building of processes demanding justice in Rio de Janeiro, in comparison to Buenos Aires. Specifically, it focuses on the ethnography produced after the murder of Rio's alderwoman Marielle Franco, to propose the notion of “attack on human rights”, showing how the category has been built through an antagonistic logic in Rio de Janeiro. Este artículo propone una reflexión sobre la categoría “derechos humanos” en cuanto categoría nativa, dotada de sentidos locales y particulares. Para ello, se vale de una perspectiva comparada sobre los usos y sentidos de la categoría violencia de estado y sobre la construcción de los procesos de demanda por justicia en Brasil en contraste con Buenos Aires. Específicamente, se detiene en la etnografía producida a partir del asesinato de la concejala carioca Marielle Franco para proponer la noción de “embate a los derechos humanos”, demostrando cómo la categoría, en Río de Janeiro, se ha ido construyendo a través de una lógica antagónica. Available from: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1182
format	article
author	Lucia Eilbaum
author_facet	Lucia Eilbaum
author_sort	Lucia Eilbaum
title	“Human rights” in dispute: State violence and demands for justice in a comparative perspective
title_short	“Human rights” in dispute: State violence and demands for justice in a comparative perspective
title_full	“Human rights” in dispute: State violence and demands for justice in a comparative perspective
title_fullStr	“Human rights” in dispute: State violence and demands for justice in a comparative perspective
title_full_unstemmed	“Human rights” in dispute: State violence and demands for justice in a comparative perspective
title_sort	“human rights” in dispute: state violence and demands for justice in a comparative perspective
publisher	Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/c8cb4f43318546b5bedb4037a8708fad
work_keys_str_mv	AT luciaeilbaum humanrightsindisputestateviolenceanddemandsforjusticeinacomparativeperspective
_version_	1718405380030070784

“Human rights” in dispute: State violence and demands for justice in a comparative perspective

Ejemplares similares