Media blind spot over West Papua

Indonesia is trying to build an international reputation as a nascent democracy and is proud of having been re-elected in 2007 to the United Nations Human Rights Council for a three-year term. But the problems in West Papua make this democratic reform story questionable. While Indonesiakeeps this t...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Maire Leadbeater
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Asia Pacific Network 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c8d25e4845e8442b8a405b20ace93041
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c8d25e4845e8442b8a405b20ace93041
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c8d25e4845e8442b8a405b20ace930412021-12-02T10:24:51ZMedia blind spot over West Papua10.24135/pjr.v14i1.9321023-94992324-2035https://doaj.org/article/c8d25e4845e8442b8a405b20ace930412008-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/932https://doaj.org/toc/1023-9499https://doaj.org/toc/2324-2035 Indonesia is trying to build an international reputation as a nascent democracy and is proud of having been re-elected in 2007 to the United Nations Human Rights Council for a three-year term. But the problems in West Papua make this democratic reform story questionable. While Indonesiakeeps this troubled province off limits to foreign journaluists and human rights investigators, Indonesia’s human rights credibility should be critically examined. Indonesia’s incorporation of West Papua has been contested ever since it took control in 1963. West Papua’s fate was sealed by a 1969 ‘Act of Free Choice’ which is known as the ‘Act of No Choice’ by the Papuans, since it was carried out under extreme duress and only 1022 men were allowed to vote (Saltford, 2003). The province remains heavily militarised and opposition to Indonesia’s rule persists. Maire LeadbeaterAsia Pacific Networkarticleactivismconflict reportinghuman rightsindigenousnationalismpeace journalismCommunication. Mass mediaP87-96Journalism. The periodical press, etc.PN4699-5650ENPacific Journalism Review, Vol 14, Iss 1 (2008)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic activism
conflict reporting
human rights
indigenous
nationalism
peace journalism
Communication. Mass media
P87-96
Journalism. The periodical press, etc.
PN4699-5650
spellingShingle activism
conflict reporting
human rights
indigenous
nationalism
peace journalism
Communication. Mass media
P87-96
Journalism. The periodical press, etc.
PN4699-5650
Maire Leadbeater
Media blind spot over West Papua
description Indonesia is trying to build an international reputation as a nascent democracy and is proud of having been re-elected in 2007 to the United Nations Human Rights Council for a three-year term. But the problems in West Papua make this democratic reform story questionable. While Indonesiakeeps this troubled province off limits to foreign journaluists and human rights investigators, Indonesia’s human rights credibility should be critically examined. Indonesia’s incorporation of West Papua has been contested ever since it took control in 1963. West Papua’s fate was sealed by a 1969 ‘Act of Free Choice’ which is known as the ‘Act of No Choice’ by the Papuans, since it was carried out under extreme duress and only 1022 men were allowed to vote (Saltford, 2003). The province remains heavily militarised and opposition to Indonesia’s rule persists.
format article
author Maire Leadbeater
author_facet Maire Leadbeater
author_sort Maire Leadbeater
title Media blind spot over West Papua
title_short Media blind spot over West Papua
title_full Media blind spot over West Papua
title_fullStr Media blind spot over West Papua
title_full_unstemmed Media blind spot over West Papua
title_sort media blind spot over west papua
publisher Asia Pacific Network
publishDate 2008
url https://doaj.org/article/c8d25e4845e8442b8a405b20ace93041
work_keys_str_mv AT maireleadbeater mediablindspotoverwestpapua
_version_ 1718397318009454592