Models of provider care in long-term care: A rapid scoping review.

<h4>Introduction</h4>One of the current challenges in long-term care homes (LTCH) is to identify the optimal model of care, which may include specialty physicians, nursing staff, person support workers, among others. There is currently no consensus on the complement or scope of care deli...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Candyce Hamel, Chantelle Garritty, Mona Hersi, Claire Butler, Leila Esmaeilisaraji, Danielle Rice, Sharon Straus, Becky Skidmore, Brian Hutton
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/c945aac1c0694550a74ebf028364d0de
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:c945aac1c0694550a74ebf028364d0de
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:c945aac1c0694550a74ebf028364d0de2021-12-02T20:06:55ZModels of provider care in long-term care: A rapid scoping review.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0254527https://doaj.org/article/c945aac1c0694550a74ebf028364d0de2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254527https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Introduction</h4>One of the current challenges in long-term care homes (LTCH) is to identify the optimal model of care, which may include specialty physicians, nursing staff, person support workers, among others. There is currently no consensus on the complement or scope of care delivered by these providers, nor is there a repository of studies that evaluate the various models of care. We conducted a rapid scoping review to identify and map what care provider models and interventions in LTCH have been evaluated to improve quality of life, quality of care, and health outcomes of residents.<h4>Methods</h4>We conducted this review over 10-weeks of English language, peer-reviewed studies published from 2010 onward. Search strategies for databases (e.g., MEDLINE) were run on July 9, 2020. Studies that evaluated models of provider care (e.g., direct patient care), or interventions delivered to facility, staff, and residents of LTCH were included. Study selection was performed independently, in duplicate. Mapping was performed by two reviewers, and data were extracted by one reviewer, with partial verification by a second reviewer.<h4>Results</h4>A total of 7,574 citations were screened based on the title/abstract, 836 were reviewed at full text, and 366 studies were included. Studies were classified according to two main categories: healthcare service delivery (n = 92) and implementation strategies (n = 274). The condition/ focus of the intervention was used to further classify the interventions into subcategories. The complex nature of the interventions may have led to a study being classified in more than one category/subcategory.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Many healthcare service interventions have been evaluated in the literature in the last decade. Well represented interventions (e.g., dementia care, exercise/mobility, optimal/appropriate medication) may present opportunities for future systematic reviews. Areas with less research (e.g., hearing care, vision care, foot care) have the potential to have an impact on balance, falls, subsequent acute care hospitalization.Candyce HamelChantelle GarrittyMona HersiClaire ButlerLeila EsmaeilisarajiDanielle RiceSharon StrausBecky SkidmoreBrian HuttonPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 7, p e0254527 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Candyce Hamel Chantelle Garritty Mona Hersi Claire Butler Leila Esmaeilisaraji Danielle Rice Sharon Straus Becky Skidmore Brian Hutton Models of provider care in long-term care: A rapid scoping review.
description	<h4>Introduction</h4>One of the current challenges in long-term care homes (LTCH) is to identify the optimal model of care, which may include specialty physicians, nursing staff, person support workers, among others. There is currently no consensus on the complement or scope of care delivered by these providers, nor is there a repository of studies that evaluate the various models of care. We conducted a rapid scoping review to identify and map what care provider models and interventions in LTCH have been evaluated to improve quality of life, quality of care, and health outcomes of residents.<h4>Methods</h4>We conducted this review over 10-weeks of English language, peer-reviewed studies published from 2010 onward. Search strategies for databases (e.g., MEDLINE) were run on July 9, 2020. Studies that evaluated models of provider care (e.g., direct patient care), or interventions delivered to facility, staff, and residents of LTCH were included. Study selection was performed independently, in duplicate. Mapping was performed by two reviewers, and data were extracted by one reviewer, with partial verification by a second reviewer.<h4>Results</h4>A total of 7,574 citations were screened based on the title/abstract, 836 were reviewed at full text, and 366 studies were included. Studies were classified according to two main categories: healthcare service delivery (n = 92) and implementation strategies (n = 274). The condition/ focus of the intervention was used to further classify the interventions into subcategories. The complex nature of the interventions may have led to a study being classified in more than one category/subcategory.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Many healthcare service interventions have been evaluated in the literature in the last decade. Well represented interventions (e.g., dementia care, exercise/mobility, optimal/appropriate medication) may present opportunities for future systematic reviews. Areas with less research (e.g., hearing care, vision care, foot care) have the potential to have an impact on balance, falls, subsequent acute care hospitalization.
format	article
author	Candyce Hamel Chantelle Garritty Mona Hersi Claire Butler Leila Esmaeilisaraji Danielle Rice Sharon Straus Becky Skidmore Brian Hutton
author_facet	Candyce Hamel Chantelle Garritty Mona Hersi Claire Butler Leila Esmaeilisaraji Danielle Rice Sharon Straus Becky Skidmore Brian Hutton
author_sort	Candyce Hamel
title	Models of provider care in long-term care: A rapid scoping review.
title_short	Models of provider care in long-term care: A rapid scoping review.
title_full	Models of provider care in long-term care: A rapid scoping review.
title_fullStr	Models of provider care in long-term care: A rapid scoping review.
title_full_unstemmed	Models of provider care in long-term care: A rapid scoping review.
title_sort	models of provider care in long-term care: a rapid scoping review.
publisher	Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/c945aac1c0694550a74ebf028364d0de
work_keys_str_mv	AT candycehamel modelsofprovidercareinlongtermcarearapidscopingreview AT chantellegarritty modelsofprovidercareinlongtermcarearapidscopingreview AT monahersi modelsofprovidercareinlongtermcarearapidscopingreview AT clairebutler modelsofprovidercareinlongtermcarearapidscopingreview AT leilaesmaeilisaraji modelsofprovidercareinlongtermcarearapidscopingreview AT daniellerice modelsofprovidercareinlongtermcarearapidscopingreview AT sharonstraus modelsofprovidercareinlongtermcarearapidscopingreview AT beckyskidmore modelsofprovidercareinlongtermcarearapidscopingreview AT brianhutton modelsofprovidercareinlongtermcarearapidscopingreview
_version_	1718375328128172032

Models of provider care in long-term care: A rapid scoping review.

Ejemplares similares