Acceptabilité sociale des grands projets à fort impact socio-environnemental au Québec : définitions et postulats

In the context of increasing social protest of major projects in Quebec, social acceptability became the cornerstone of the arguments of the different stakeholders (NGO, citizen groups, companies, government). Nevertheless, this notion is rarely defined and used differently according to stakeholders...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Pierre Batellier
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	FR
Publicado:	Éditions en environnement VertigO 2016
Materias:	social acceptance social acceptability consent social license to operate conflict public attitudes Environmental sciences GE1-350
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/c95ff9fea7bb46e583ffaceb4a44ae53
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:c95ff9fea7bb46e583ffaceb4a44ae53
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:c95ff9fea7bb46e583ffaceb4a44ae532021-12-02T10:00:11ZAcceptabilité sociale des grands projets à fort impact socio-environnemental au Québec : définitions et postulats1492-844210.4000/vertigo.16920https://doaj.org/article/c95ff9fea7bb46e583ffaceb4a44ae532016-05-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/16920https://doaj.org/toc/1492-8442In the context of increasing social protest of major projects in Quebec, social acceptability became the cornerstone of the arguments of the different stakeholders (NGO, citizen groups, companies, government). Nevertheless, this notion is rarely defined and used differently according to stakeholders and the issues at stake, without any theoretical or conceptual reference and based on values, purposes and assumptions rarely made explicit. If the malleability of the notion contributes to a great extent to its success, allows the emergency of different social constructs and fuels a rich debate, it also opens the door to pitfalls, leaps and manipulation of the notion depending on the interests of the stakeholders, fostering a dialogue of the deaf and conflicts. In order to contribute to the ongoing collective discussion in Québec and to enlighten the questioning and choices of the stakeholders with regard to the definition and the uses of the notion of social acceptance, this article proposes (1) a mapping of the lexical and semantic field of social acceptance in the related literature and (2) a critical discussion, by deconstruction and reconstruction of twelve recurrent assumptions in the speeches and practices of some stakeholders, selected according to their influence on the way to conceive and then practice social acceptance, and according to the risks of bias and confusion between assumptions, hypothesis and evidences. Such guidelines are likely to contribute to the social and academic debates in relation to the issues of management and public decision-making with respect to major projects.Pierre BatellierÉditions en environnement VertigOarticlesocial acceptancesocial acceptabilityconsentsocial license to operateconflictpublic attitudesEnvironmental sciencesGE1-350FRVertigO, Vol 16, Iss 1 (2016)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	FR
topic	social acceptance social acceptability consent social license to operate conflict public attitudes Environmental sciences GE1-350
spellingShingle	social acceptance social acceptability consent social license to operate conflict public attitudes Environmental sciences GE1-350 Pierre Batellier Acceptabilité sociale des grands projets à fort impact socio-environnemental au Québec : définitions et postulats
description	In the context of increasing social protest of major projects in Quebec, social acceptability became the cornerstone of the arguments of the different stakeholders (NGO, citizen groups, companies, government). Nevertheless, this notion is rarely defined and used differently according to stakeholders and the issues at stake, without any theoretical or conceptual reference and based on values, purposes and assumptions rarely made explicit. If the malleability of the notion contributes to a great extent to its success, allows the emergency of different social constructs and fuels a rich debate, it also opens the door to pitfalls, leaps and manipulation of the notion depending on the interests of the stakeholders, fostering a dialogue of the deaf and conflicts. In order to contribute to the ongoing collective discussion in Québec and to enlighten the questioning and choices of the stakeholders with regard to the definition and the uses of the notion of social acceptance, this article proposes (1) a mapping of the lexical and semantic field of social acceptance in the related literature and (2) a critical discussion, by deconstruction and reconstruction of twelve recurrent assumptions in the speeches and practices of some stakeholders, selected according to their influence on the way to conceive and then practice social acceptance, and according to the risks of bias and confusion between assumptions, hypothesis and evidences. Such guidelines are likely to contribute to the social and academic debates in relation to the issues of management and public decision-making with respect to major projects.
format	article
author	Pierre Batellier
author_facet	Pierre Batellier
author_sort	Pierre Batellier
title	Acceptabilité sociale des grands projets à fort impact socio-environnemental au Québec : définitions et postulats
title_short	Acceptabilité sociale des grands projets à fort impact socio-environnemental au Québec : définitions et postulats
title_full	Acceptabilité sociale des grands projets à fort impact socio-environnemental au Québec : définitions et postulats
title_fullStr	Acceptabilité sociale des grands projets à fort impact socio-environnemental au Québec : définitions et postulats
title_full_unstemmed	Acceptabilité sociale des grands projets à fort impact socio-environnemental au Québec : définitions et postulats
title_sort	acceptabilité sociale des grands projets à fort impact socio-environnemental au québec : définitions et postulats
publisher	Éditions en environnement VertigO
publishDate	2016
url	https://doaj.org/article/c95ff9fea7bb46e583ffaceb4a44ae53
work_keys_str_mv	AT pierrebatellier acceptabilitesocialedesgrandsprojetsafortimpactsocioenvironnementalauquebecdefinitionsetpostulats
_version_	1718397829647433728

Acceptabilité sociale des grands projets à fort impact socio-environnemental au Québec : définitions et postulats

Ejemplares similares