What should be done to tackle ghostwriting in the medical literature?

<h4>Background to the debate</h4>Ghostwriting occurs when someone makes substantial contributions to a manuscript without attribution or disclosure. It is considered bad publication practice in the medical sciences, and some argue it is scientific misconduct. At its extreme, medical ghos...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:

Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux:	Peter C Gøtzsche, Jerome P Kassirer, Karen L Woolley, Elizabeth Wager, Adam Jacobs, Art Gertel, Cindy Hamilton
Format:	article
Langue:	EN
Publié:	Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2009
Sujets:	Medicine R
Accès en ligne:	https://doaj.org/article/c96f5a0d96e7467a991006824a08eb30
Tags:	Ajouter un tag Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:c96f5a0d96e7467a991006824a08eb30
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:c96f5a0d96e7467a991006824a08eb302021-11-25T05:37:22ZWhat should be done to tackle ghostwriting in the medical literature?1549-12771549-167610.1371/journal.pmed.1000023https://doaj.org/article/c96f5a0d96e7467a991006824a08eb302009-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/19192943/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1549-1277https://doaj.org/toc/1549-1676<h4>Background to the debate</h4>Ghostwriting occurs when someone makes substantial contributions to a manuscript without attribution or disclosure. It is considered bad publication practice in the medical sciences, and some argue it is scientific misconduct. At its extreme, medical ghostwriting involves pharmaceutical companies hiring professional writers to produce papers promoting their products but hiding those contributions and instead naming academic physicians or scientists as the authors. To improve transparency, many editors' associations and journals allow professional medical writers to contribute to the writing of papers without being listed as authors provided their role is acknowledged. This debate examines how best to tackle ghostwriting in the medical literature from the perspectives of a researcher, an editor, and the professional medical writer.Peter C GøtzscheJerome P KassirerKaren L WoolleyElizabeth WagerAdam JacobsArt GertelCindy HamiltonPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRENPLoS Medicine, Vol 6, Iss 2, p e23 (2009)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R
spellingShingle	Medicine R Peter C Gøtzsche Jerome P Kassirer Karen L Woolley Elizabeth Wager Adam Jacobs Art Gertel Cindy Hamilton What should be done to tackle ghostwriting in the medical literature?
description	<h4>Background to the debate</h4>Ghostwriting occurs when someone makes substantial contributions to a manuscript without attribution or disclosure. It is considered bad publication practice in the medical sciences, and some argue it is scientific misconduct. At its extreme, medical ghostwriting involves pharmaceutical companies hiring professional writers to produce papers promoting their products but hiding those contributions and instead naming academic physicians or scientists as the authors. To improve transparency, many editors' associations and journals allow professional medical writers to contribute to the writing of papers without being listed as authors provided their role is acknowledged. This debate examines how best to tackle ghostwriting in the medical literature from the perspectives of a researcher, an editor, and the professional medical writer.
format	article
author	Peter C Gøtzsche Jerome P Kassirer Karen L Woolley Elizabeth Wager Adam Jacobs Art Gertel Cindy Hamilton
author_facet	Peter C Gøtzsche Jerome P Kassirer Karen L Woolley Elizabeth Wager Adam Jacobs Art Gertel Cindy Hamilton
author_sort	Peter C Gøtzsche
title	What should be done to tackle ghostwriting in the medical literature?
title_short	What should be done to tackle ghostwriting in the medical literature?
title_full	What should be done to tackle ghostwriting in the medical literature?
title_fullStr	What should be done to tackle ghostwriting in the medical literature?
title_full_unstemmed	What should be done to tackle ghostwriting in the medical literature?
title_sort	what should be done to tackle ghostwriting in the medical literature?
publisher	Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate	2009
url	https://doaj.org/article/c96f5a0d96e7467a991006824a08eb30
work_keys_str_mv	AT petercgøtzsche whatshouldbedonetotackleghostwritinginthemedicalliterature AT jeromepkassirer whatshouldbedonetotackleghostwritinginthemedicalliterature AT karenlwoolley whatshouldbedonetotackleghostwritinginthemedicalliterature AT elizabethwager whatshouldbedonetotackleghostwritinginthemedicalliterature AT adamjacobs whatshouldbedonetotackleghostwritinginthemedicalliterature AT artgertel whatshouldbedonetotackleghostwritinginthemedicalliterature AT cindyhamilton whatshouldbedonetotackleghostwritinginthemedicalliterature
_version_	1718414603717705728

What should be done to tackle ghostwriting in the medical literature?

Documents similaires