Resistance to Fruit Fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) and Tea Mosquito Bug, Helopeltis antonii (Sign.) in Certain Wild Psidium Species

Five wild species of Psidium viz., Psidium cattleianum lucidum, P. chinensis, P. friedrichsthalianum, P. molle and P. quadrangularis were evaluated for resistance to fruit fly [Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel)] and tea mosquito bug (TMB) [Helopeltis antonii (Sign.)], during 2002-04. Significant variatio...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	P Venkata Rami Reddy, C Vasugi
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Society for Promotion of Horticulture - Indian Institute of Horticultural Research 2008
Materias:	guava psidium species resistance fruit fly tea mosquito bug Plant culture SB1-1110
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/c979df73913b46fe861bec9c25797fe6
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:c979df73913b46fe861bec9c25797fe6
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:c979df73913b46fe861bec9c25797fe62021-12-02T10:01:30ZResistance to Fruit Fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) and Tea Mosquito Bug, Helopeltis antonii (Sign.) in Certain Wild Psidium Species0973-354X2582-4899https://doaj.org/article/c979df73913b46fe861bec9c25797fe62008-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://jhs.iihr.res.in/index.php/jhs/article/view/604https://doaj.org/toc/0973-354Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2582-4899Five wild species of Psidium viz., Psidium cattleianum lucidum, P. chinensis, P. friedrichsthalianum, P. molle and P. quadrangularis were evaluated for resistance to fruit fly [Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel)] and tea mosquito bug (TMB) [Helopeltis antonii (Sign.)], during 2002-04. Significant variations were recorded among species in their reaction to pests. Two species viz., P. chinensis and P. quadrangularis were resistant to fruit fly (<10% fruit damage) while P. quadrangularis was immune. Psidium. molle and P. cattleianum were resistant to tea mosquito bug. Pest incidence was correlated with fruit biochemical components viz., total soluble solids (TSS), total sugars, vitamin C and acidity. The TSS and total sugars were positively correlated with fruit fly infestation while acidity was negatively correlated. The TMB incidence did not exhibit significant correlation with any of these parameters.P Venkata Rami ReddyC VasugiSociety for Promotion of Horticulture - Indian Institute of Horticultural Researcharticleguavapsidium speciesresistancefruit flytea mosquito bugPlant cultureSB1-1110ENJournal of Horticultural Sciences, Vol 3, Iss 1, Pp 79-81 (2008)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	guava psidium species resistance fruit fly tea mosquito bug Plant culture SB1-1110
spellingShingle	guava psidium species resistance fruit fly tea mosquito bug Plant culture SB1-1110 P Venkata Rami Reddy C Vasugi Resistance to Fruit Fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) and Tea Mosquito Bug, Helopeltis antonii (Sign.) in Certain Wild Psidium Species
description	Five wild species of Psidium viz., Psidium cattleianum lucidum, P. chinensis, P. friedrichsthalianum, P. molle and P. quadrangularis were evaluated for resistance to fruit fly [Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel)] and tea mosquito bug (TMB) [Helopeltis antonii (Sign.)], during 2002-04. Significant variations were recorded among species in their reaction to pests. Two species viz., P. chinensis and P. quadrangularis were resistant to fruit fly (<10% fruit damage) while P. quadrangularis was immune. Psidium. molle and P. cattleianum were resistant to tea mosquito bug. Pest incidence was correlated with fruit biochemical components viz., total soluble solids (TSS), total sugars, vitamin C and acidity. The TSS and total sugars were positively correlated with fruit fly infestation while acidity was negatively correlated. The TMB incidence did not exhibit significant correlation with any of these parameters.
format	article
author	P Venkata Rami Reddy C Vasugi
author_facet	P Venkata Rami Reddy C Vasugi
author_sort	P Venkata Rami Reddy
title	Resistance to Fruit Fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) and Tea Mosquito Bug, Helopeltis antonii (Sign.) in Certain Wild Psidium Species
title_short	Resistance to Fruit Fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) and Tea Mosquito Bug, Helopeltis antonii (Sign.) in Certain Wild Psidium Species
title_full	Resistance to Fruit Fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) and Tea Mosquito Bug, Helopeltis antonii (Sign.) in Certain Wild Psidium Species
title_fullStr	Resistance to Fruit Fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) and Tea Mosquito Bug, Helopeltis antonii (Sign.) in Certain Wild Psidium Species
title_full_unstemmed	Resistance to Fruit Fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) and Tea Mosquito Bug, Helopeltis antonii (Sign.) in Certain Wild Psidium Species
title_sort	resistance to fruit fly, bactrocera dorsalis (hendel) and tea mosquito bug, helopeltis antonii (sign.) in certain wild psidium species
publisher	Society for Promotion of Horticulture - Indian Institute of Horticultural Research
publishDate	2008
url	https://doaj.org/article/c979df73913b46fe861bec9c25797fe6
work_keys_str_mv	AT pvenkataramireddy resistancetofruitflybactroceradorsalishendelandteamosquitobughelopeltisantoniisignincertainwildpsidiumspecies AT cvasugi resistancetofruitflybactroceradorsalishendelandteamosquitobughelopeltisantoniisignincertainwildpsidiumspecies
_version_	1718397774025719808

Resistance to Fruit Fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) and Tea Mosquito Bug, Helopeltis antonii (Sign.) in Certain Wild Psidium Species

Ejemplares similares