Dissociated neural processing for decisions in managers and non-managers.

Functional neuroimaging studies of decision-making so far mainly focused on decisions under uncertainty or negotiation with other persons. Dual process theory assumes that, in such situations, decision making relies on either a rapid intuitive, automated or a slower rational processing system. Howev...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Svenja Caspers, Stefan Heim, Marc G Lucas, Egon Stephan, Lorenz Fischer, Katrin Amunts, Karl Zilles
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c9a7ccb864a44f68a8bbcd7e61681b7a
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c9a7ccb864a44f68a8bbcd7e61681b7a
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c9a7ccb864a44f68a8bbcd7e61681b7a2021-11-18T07:08:00ZDissociated neural processing for decisions in managers and non-managers.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0043537https://doaj.org/article/c9a7ccb864a44f68a8bbcd7e61681b7a2012-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22927984/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Functional neuroimaging studies of decision-making so far mainly focused on decisions under uncertainty or negotiation with other persons. Dual process theory assumes that, in such situations, decision making relies on either a rapid intuitive, automated or a slower rational processing system. However, it still remains elusive how personality factors or professional requirements might modulate the decision process and the underlying neural mechanisms. Since decision making is a key task of managers, we hypothesized that managers, facing higher pressure for frequent and rapid decisions than non-managers, prefer the heuristic, automated decision strategy in contrast to non-managers. Such different strategies may, in turn, rely on different neural systems. We tested managers and non-managers in a functional magnetic resonance imaging study using a forced-choice paradigm on word-pairs. Managers showed subcortical activation in the head of the caudate nucleus, and reduced hemodynamic response within the cortex. In contrast, non-managers revealed the opposite pattern. With the head of the caudate nucleus being an initiating component for process automation, these results supported the initial hypothesis, hinting at automation during decisions in managers. More generally, the findings reveal how different professional requirements might modulate cognitive decision processing.Svenja CaspersStefan HeimMarc G LucasEgon StephanLorenz FischerKatrin AmuntsKarl ZillesKarl ZillesPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 7, Iss 8, p e43537 (2012)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Svenja Caspers
Stefan Heim
Marc G Lucas
Egon Stephan
Lorenz Fischer
Katrin Amunts
Karl Zilles
Karl Zilles
Dissociated neural processing for decisions in managers and non-managers.
description Functional neuroimaging studies of decision-making so far mainly focused on decisions under uncertainty or negotiation with other persons. Dual process theory assumes that, in such situations, decision making relies on either a rapid intuitive, automated or a slower rational processing system. However, it still remains elusive how personality factors or professional requirements might modulate the decision process and the underlying neural mechanisms. Since decision making is a key task of managers, we hypothesized that managers, facing higher pressure for frequent and rapid decisions than non-managers, prefer the heuristic, automated decision strategy in contrast to non-managers. Such different strategies may, in turn, rely on different neural systems. We tested managers and non-managers in a functional magnetic resonance imaging study using a forced-choice paradigm on word-pairs. Managers showed subcortical activation in the head of the caudate nucleus, and reduced hemodynamic response within the cortex. In contrast, non-managers revealed the opposite pattern. With the head of the caudate nucleus being an initiating component for process automation, these results supported the initial hypothesis, hinting at automation during decisions in managers. More generally, the findings reveal how different professional requirements might modulate cognitive decision processing.
format article
author Svenja Caspers
Stefan Heim
Marc G Lucas
Egon Stephan
Lorenz Fischer
Katrin Amunts
Karl Zilles
Karl Zilles
author_facet Svenja Caspers
Stefan Heim
Marc G Lucas
Egon Stephan
Lorenz Fischer
Katrin Amunts
Karl Zilles
Karl Zilles
author_sort Svenja Caspers
title Dissociated neural processing for decisions in managers and non-managers.
title_short Dissociated neural processing for decisions in managers and non-managers.
title_full Dissociated neural processing for decisions in managers and non-managers.
title_fullStr Dissociated neural processing for decisions in managers and non-managers.
title_full_unstemmed Dissociated neural processing for decisions in managers and non-managers.
title_sort dissociated neural processing for decisions in managers and non-managers.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2012
url https://doaj.org/article/c9a7ccb864a44f68a8bbcd7e61681b7a
work_keys_str_mv AT svenjacaspers dissociatedneuralprocessingfordecisionsinmanagersandnonmanagers
AT stefanheim dissociatedneuralprocessingfordecisionsinmanagersandnonmanagers
AT marcglucas dissociatedneuralprocessingfordecisionsinmanagersandnonmanagers
AT egonstephan dissociatedneuralprocessingfordecisionsinmanagersandnonmanagers
AT lorenzfischer dissociatedneuralprocessingfordecisionsinmanagersandnonmanagers
AT katrinamunts dissociatedneuralprocessingfordecisionsinmanagersandnonmanagers
AT karlzilles dissociatedneuralprocessingfordecisionsinmanagersandnonmanagers
AT karlzilles dissociatedneuralprocessingfordecisionsinmanagersandnonmanagers
_version_ 1718423942365970432