DIASPORIC TRAUMA OR TRAUMATIC DIASPORA?:THE NAMESAKE BY JHUMPALAHIRI RECONSIDERED

Coptic or diaspora (Ancient Greek: ???????? - "diaspora") has been described as living as a minority elsewhere, breaking away from the mainland of a people, nation, or belief for a long time. The word expresses both the act of breaking apart and the people who are living apart as a minorit...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Bülent Cercis TANRITANIR
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	DE EN FR TR
Publicado:	Fırat University 2019
Materias:	culture trauma diaspora jhumpa lahiri namesake Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/c9e04b78859045fc9827b9a268485937
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:c9e04b78859045fc9827b9a268485937
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:c9e04b78859045fc9827b9a2684859372021-11-24T09:20:45ZDIASPORIC TRAUMA OR TRAUMATIC DIASPORA?:THE NAMESAKE BY JHUMPALAHIRI RECONSIDERED2148-416310.9761/JASSS7121https://doaj.org/article/c9e04b78859045fc9827b9a2684859372019-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://jasstudies.com/index.jsp?mod=tammetin&makaleadi=2053820450_6-Do%C3%A7.%20Dr.%20B%C3%BClent%20Cercis%20Tanr%C4%B1tan%C4%B1r.pdf&key=28359https://doaj.org/toc/2148-4163Coptic or diaspora (Ancient Greek: ???????? - "diaspora") has been described as living as a minority elsewhere, breaking away from the mainland of a people, nation, or belief for a long time. The word expresses both the act of breaking apart and the people who are living apart as a minority. As the journey of man over the world continues, the concept of diaspora will continue to be discussed. The terms ‘diaspora’ and ‘trauma’ are commonly used almost interchangeably especially in the literary products of Amerasians. Life in diaspora is considered to be one of the main reasons for cultural trauma or vice versa. Cultural trauma is a kind of diasporic result and a natural resource of diaspora, so it is believed that there is a mutual cause-and-effect between the two. Jeffrey C. Alexander claims that “Cultural trauma occurs when members of a collectivity feel they have been objected a horrendous event that leaves indelible marks upon their group consciousness marking their memories forever and changing their future identity in fundamental and irrevocable ways” (VIII). This article reveals the intercultural conflicts, traumas, isolation, hopes and dilemmas and this mutual influence through semi-fictional characters in The Namesake by Jhumpa Lahiri, who find themselves between indigenous culture and home culture.Bülent Cercis TANRITANIRFırat Universityarticleculturetraumadiasporajhumpa lahirinamesakeSocial SciencesHSocial sciences (General)H1-99DEENFRTRJournal of Academic Social Science Studies , Vol 10, Iss 59, Pp 103-112 (2019)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	DE EN FR TR
topic	culture trauma diaspora jhumpa lahiri namesake Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99
spellingShingle	culture trauma diaspora jhumpa lahiri namesake Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99 Bülent Cercis TANRITANIR DIASPORIC TRAUMA OR TRAUMATIC DIASPORA?:THE NAMESAKE BY JHUMPALAHIRI RECONSIDERED
description	Coptic or diaspora (Ancient Greek: ???????? - "diaspora") has been described as living as a minority elsewhere, breaking away from the mainland of a people, nation, or belief for a long time. The word expresses both the act of breaking apart and the people who are living apart as a minority. As the journey of man over the world continues, the concept of diaspora will continue to be discussed. The terms ‘diaspora’ and ‘trauma’ are commonly used almost interchangeably especially in the literary products of Amerasians. Life in diaspora is considered to be one of the main reasons for cultural trauma or vice versa. Cultural trauma is a kind of diasporic result and a natural resource of diaspora, so it is believed that there is a mutual cause-and-effect between the two. Jeffrey C. Alexander claims that “Cultural trauma occurs when members of a collectivity feel they have been objected a horrendous event that leaves indelible marks upon their group consciousness marking their memories forever and changing their future identity in fundamental and irrevocable ways” (VIII). This article reveals the intercultural conflicts, traumas, isolation, hopes and dilemmas and this mutual influence through semi-fictional characters in The Namesake by Jhumpa Lahiri, who find themselves between indigenous culture and home culture.
format	article
author	Bülent Cercis TANRITANIR
author_facet	Bülent Cercis TANRITANIR
author_sort	Bülent Cercis TANRITANIR
title	DIASPORIC TRAUMA OR TRAUMATIC DIASPORA?:THE NAMESAKE BY JHUMPALAHIRI RECONSIDERED
title_short	DIASPORIC TRAUMA OR TRAUMATIC DIASPORA?:THE NAMESAKE BY JHUMPALAHIRI RECONSIDERED
title_full	DIASPORIC TRAUMA OR TRAUMATIC DIASPORA?:THE NAMESAKE BY JHUMPALAHIRI RECONSIDERED
title_fullStr	DIASPORIC TRAUMA OR TRAUMATIC DIASPORA?:THE NAMESAKE BY JHUMPALAHIRI RECONSIDERED
title_full_unstemmed	DIASPORIC TRAUMA OR TRAUMATIC DIASPORA?:THE NAMESAKE BY JHUMPALAHIRI RECONSIDERED
title_sort	diasporic trauma or traumatic diaspora?:the namesake by jhumpalahiri reconsidered
publisher	Fırat University
publishDate	2019
url	https://doaj.org/article/c9e04b78859045fc9827b9a268485937
work_keys_str_mv	AT bulentcercistanritanir diasporictraumaortraumaticdiasporathenamesakebyjhumpalahirireconsidered
_version_	1718415573961932800

DIASPORIC TRAUMA OR TRAUMATIC DIASPORA?:THE NAMESAKE BY JHUMPALAHIRI RECONSIDERED

Ejemplares similares