Greckie przywództwo polityczne w drugiej połowie XX w. – uwarunkowania i charakter

Greek political leadership in the 2nd half of the 20th century: context and character Over the centuries, difficult living conditions in Greece contributed to the development of the client‑patron system as a way of providing subsistence for the generally poor population. Following the establishm...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Mirosław Dymarski
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN PL
Publicado:	Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing 2021
Materias:	Grecja przywództwo polityka grecka XX w klientelizm społeczeństwo Law K Political science J
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/ca035f905ed741f1aceba22f0416a1af
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:ca035f905ed741f1aceba22f0416a1af
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:ca035f905ed741f1aceba22f0416a1af2021-11-27T13:10:01ZGreckie przywództwo polityczne w drugiej połowie XX w. – uwarunkowania i charakter10.12797/Politeja.13.2016.43.041733-67162391-6737https://doaj.org/article/ca035f905ed741f1aceba22f0416a1af2021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.akademicka.pl/politeja/article/view/2133https://doaj.org/toc/1733-6716https://doaj.org/toc/2391-6737 Greek political leadership in the 2nd half of the 20th century: context and character Over the centuries, difficult living conditions in Greece contributed to the development of the client‑patron system as a way of providing subsistence for the generally poor population. Following the establishment of the independent Greek state in 1830, clientelism was absorbed into the nation’s political life. Greek political leadership in the 2nd half of the 20th century remained under the pressure of this time‑honored heritage. The state’s social role was regarded as a priority for the Greeks by both the right of Konstantinos Karamanlis and the left of Andreas Papandreou. The leaders did not break away from clientelism even in the context of the stabilization of democracy after 1950. Quite the contrary, they developed it by transforming former clientelist relations into the system of sociopolitical control over the state, with the political parties and their administrative apparatus becoming the principal instrument for exercising this control. As a result, partisan clientelism emerged with electorates as its beneficiaries. Their attention focused on the perfecting of the system to which the state and national economy would eventually fall victim. In the later 1990s, with the deaths of K. Karamanlis and A. Papandreou, the time of charismatic leadership in Greek politics came to an end but the system they created has continued. Mirosław DymarskiKsiegarnia Akademicka PublishingarticleGrecjaprzywództwopolityka greckaXX wklientelizmspołeczeństwoLawKPolitical scienceJENPLPoliteja, Vol 13, Iss 4 (43) (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN PL
topic	Grecja przywództwo polityka grecka XX w klientelizm społeczeństwo Law K Political science J
spellingShingle	Grecja przywództwo polityka grecka XX w klientelizm społeczeństwo Law K Political science J Mirosław Dymarski Greckie przywództwo polityczne w drugiej połowie XX w. – uwarunkowania i charakter
description	Greek political leadership in the 2nd half of the 20th century: context and character Over the centuries, difficult living conditions in Greece contributed to the development of the client‑patron system as a way of providing subsistence for the generally poor population. Following the establishment of the independent Greek state in 1830, clientelism was absorbed into the nation’s political life. Greek political leadership in the 2nd half of the 20th century remained under the pressure of this time‑honored heritage. The state’s social role was regarded as a priority for the Greeks by both the right of Konstantinos Karamanlis and the left of Andreas Papandreou. The leaders did not break away from clientelism even in the context of the stabilization of democracy after 1950. Quite the contrary, they developed it by transforming former clientelist relations into the system of sociopolitical control over the state, with the political parties and their administrative apparatus becoming the principal instrument for exercising this control. As a result, partisan clientelism emerged with electorates as its beneficiaries. Their attention focused on the perfecting of the system to which the state and national economy would eventually fall victim. In the later 1990s, with the deaths of K. Karamanlis and A. Papandreou, the time of charismatic leadership in Greek politics came to an end but the system they created has continued.
format	article
author	Mirosław Dymarski
author_facet	Mirosław Dymarski
author_sort	Mirosław Dymarski
title	Greckie przywództwo polityczne w drugiej połowie XX w. – uwarunkowania i charakter
title_short	Greckie przywództwo polityczne w drugiej połowie XX w. – uwarunkowania i charakter
title_full	Greckie przywództwo polityczne w drugiej połowie XX w. – uwarunkowania i charakter
title_fullStr	Greckie przywództwo polityczne w drugiej połowie XX w. – uwarunkowania i charakter
title_full_unstemmed	Greckie przywództwo polityczne w drugiej połowie XX w. – uwarunkowania i charakter
title_sort	greckie przywództwo polityczne w drugiej połowie xx w. – uwarunkowania i charakter
publisher	Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/ca035f905ed741f1aceba22f0416a1af
work_keys_str_mv	AT mirosławdymarski greckieprzywodztwopolitycznewdrugiejpołowiexxwuwarunkowaniaicharakter
_version_	1718408707999531008

Greckie przywództwo polityczne w drugiej połowie XX w. – uwarunkowania i charakter

Ejemplares similares