Empirical comparison of reduced representation bisulfite sequencing and Infinium BeadChip reproducibility and coverage of DNA methylation in humans
Epigenetics: choose your DNA methylation probing tool wisely! Researchers who study human epigenetics need to carefully consider the platform used to measure genome-wide patterns of DNA methylation. A team led by Karin Michels and Andrea Baccarelli from Harvard University in Boston, Massachusetts, U...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/ca7ef4fedc904b3b8804fb40bf166092 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | Epigenetics: choose your DNA methylation probing tool wisely! Researchers who study human epigenetics need to carefully consider the platform used to measure genome-wide patterns of DNA methylation. A team led by Karin Michels and Andrea Baccarelli from Harvard University in Boston, Massachusetts, USA, empirically examined the strengths and weaknesses of two methylation profiling tools: Illumina’s Infinium BeadChip, which uses a microarray system to interrogate hundreds of thousands of methylation sites across the genome at single-nucleotide resolution; and a high-throughput sequencing-based approach known as rapid multiplexed reduced representation bisulfite sequencing, or rmRRBS. The former did a better job at reading methylation in protein-coding and mitochondrial-related genes, while the latter required less input DNA and covered more methylation sites across the genome. The authors conclude that a scientist’s platform preference should depend on the nature of his or her investigation. |
|---|