Understanding the psychological impacts of responding to a terrorist incident

Background Responding to a mass casualty event can cause significant distress, even for highly trained medical and emergency services personnel. Objective The purpose of the study was to understand more about first responders’ perspectives about their participation in major incident responses, speci...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elena A. Skryabina, Naomi Betts, Richard Amlôt, Gabriel Reedy
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/caa1c0fff6bb4f7a99a440162a69acd4
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:caa1c0fff6bb4f7a99a440162a69acd4
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:caa1c0fff6bb4f7a99a440162a69acd42021-12-01T14:40:59ZUnderstanding the psychological impacts of responding to a terrorist incident2000-806610.1080/20008198.2021.1959116https://doaj.org/article/caa1c0fff6bb4f7a99a440162a69acd42021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2021.1959116https://doaj.org/toc/2000-8066Background Responding to a mass casualty event can cause significant distress, even for highly trained medical and emergency services personnel. Objective The purpose of the study was to understand more about first responders’ perspectives about their participation in major incident responses, specifically how and which individual and system factors contributed to their preparedness or may have enabled or hindered their response. The aim of the work was to improve preparedness and response for future incidents. Methods This study reports a detailed analysis of qualitative interview data from frontline staff who responded to a large mass casualty terrorist incident in the UK in 2017. Data highlighted the psychological distress caused by responding to terrorist events and thus became the focus of further, detailed analysis. Results Participants (n = 21) articulated in their own words the psychological distress experienced by many of the first responders to the event. Participants reported that they were not prepared to deal with psychological impact associated with this mass casualty terrorist incident and their role in the response, and that follow-up support was inconsistent. Multiple factors were identified as potentially increasing psychological distress. Social support provided by peers and organizational debriefs were identified as two most common support mechanisms. Organizational support was identified as inconsistent. Conclusions This research contributes to the literature the voices of first responders to UK terrorist incidents, building on existing findings while further contributing unique contextual perspectives. This research reinforces the importance of psychosocial support for those who respond to these tragic incidents, and offers a number of recommendations for organizational preparedness for future events. Abbreviations A&E: Accident and Emergency; EPRR: Emergency Preparedness, Resilience and Response; ERD: Emergency Response Department; HEPE: Health Emergency Preparedness Exercise; PHE: Public Health England; PHE REGG: Public Health England Research Ethics and Governance Group; MCI: Mass Casualty Incident; NHS: National Health ServiceElena A. SkryabinaNaomi BettsRichard AmlôtGabriel ReedyTaylor & Francis Grouparticlemajor incidentpsychological effecthealthcare responderhealth responseterrorist attackmanchester arena bombingresponder wellbeingmental healthmass casualtyPsychiatryRC435-571ENEuropean Journal of Psychotraumatology, Vol 12, Iss 1 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic major incident
psychological effect
healthcare responder
health response
terrorist attack
manchester arena bombing
responder wellbeing
mental health
mass casualty
Psychiatry
RC435-571
spellingShingle major incident
psychological effect
healthcare responder
health response
terrorist attack
manchester arena bombing
responder wellbeing
mental health
mass casualty
Psychiatry
RC435-571
Elena A. Skryabina
Naomi Betts
Richard Amlôt
Gabriel Reedy
Understanding the psychological impacts of responding to a terrorist incident
description Background Responding to a mass casualty event can cause significant distress, even for highly trained medical and emergency services personnel. Objective The purpose of the study was to understand more about first responders’ perspectives about their participation in major incident responses, specifically how and which individual and system factors contributed to their preparedness or may have enabled or hindered their response. The aim of the work was to improve preparedness and response for future incidents. Methods This study reports a detailed analysis of qualitative interview data from frontline staff who responded to a large mass casualty terrorist incident in the UK in 2017. Data highlighted the psychological distress caused by responding to terrorist events and thus became the focus of further, detailed analysis. Results Participants (n = 21) articulated in their own words the psychological distress experienced by many of the first responders to the event. Participants reported that they were not prepared to deal with psychological impact associated with this mass casualty terrorist incident and their role in the response, and that follow-up support was inconsistent. Multiple factors were identified as potentially increasing psychological distress. Social support provided by peers and organizational debriefs were identified as two most common support mechanisms. Organizational support was identified as inconsistent. Conclusions This research contributes to the literature the voices of first responders to UK terrorist incidents, building on existing findings while further contributing unique contextual perspectives. This research reinforces the importance of psychosocial support for those who respond to these tragic incidents, and offers a number of recommendations for organizational preparedness for future events. Abbreviations A&E: Accident and Emergency; EPRR: Emergency Preparedness, Resilience and Response; ERD: Emergency Response Department; HEPE: Health Emergency Preparedness Exercise; PHE: Public Health England; PHE REGG: Public Health England Research Ethics and Governance Group; MCI: Mass Casualty Incident; NHS: National Health Service
format article
author Elena A. Skryabina
Naomi Betts
Richard Amlôt
Gabriel Reedy
author_facet Elena A. Skryabina
Naomi Betts
Richard Amlôt
Gabriel Reedy
author_sort Elena A. Skryabina
title Understanding the psychological impacts of responding to a terrorist incident
title_short Understanding the psychological impacts of responding to a terrorist incident
title_full Understanding the psychological impacts of responding to a terrorist incident
title_fullStr Understanding the psychological impacts of responding to a terrorist incident
title_full_unstemmed Understanding the psychological impacts of responding to a terrorist incident
title_sort understanding the psychological impacts of responding to a terrorist incident
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/caa1c0fff6bb4f7a99a440162a69acd4
work_keys_str_mv AT elenaaskryabina understandingthepsychologicalimpactsofrespondingtoaterroristincident
AT naomibetts understandingthepsychologicalimpactsofrespondingtoaterroristincident
AT richardamlot understandingthepsychologicalimpactsofrespondingtoaterroristincident
AT gabrielreedy understandingthepsychologicalimpactsofrespondingtoaterroristincident
_version_ 1718405021509353472