Supporting elimination of lymphatic filariasis in Samoa by predicting locations of residual infection using machine learning and geostatistics

Abstract The global elimination of lymphatic filariasis (LF) is a major focus of the World Health Organization. One key challenge is locating residual infections that can perpetuate the transmission cycle. We show how a targeted sampling strategy using predictions from a geospatial model, combining...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Helen J. Mayfield, Hugh Sturrock, Benjamin F. Arnold, Ricardo Andrade-Pacheco, Therese Kearns, Patricia Graves, Take Naseri, Robert Thomsen, Katherine Gass, Colleen L. Lau
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2020
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/cb04387885e54caa9663c31ec57feff6
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:cb04387885e54caa9663c31ec57feff6
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:cb04387885e54caa9663c31ec57feff62021-12-02T15:09:32ZSupporting elimination of lymphatic filariasis in Samoa by predicting locations of residual infection using machine learning and geostatistics10.1038/s41598-020-77519-82045-2322https://doaj.org/article/cb04387885e54caa9663c31ec57feff62020-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77519-8https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The global elimination of lymphatic filariasis (LF) is a major focus of the World Health Organization. One key challenge is locating residual infections that can perpetuate the transmission cycle. We show how a targeted sampling strategy using predictions from a geospatial model, combining random forests and geostatistics, can improve the sampling efficiency for identifying locations with high infection prevalence. Predictions were made based on the household locations of infected persons identified from previous surveys, and environmental variables relevant to mosquito density. Results show that targeting sampling using model predictions would have allowed 52% of infections to be identified by sampling just 17.7% of households. The odds ratio for identifying an infected individual in a household at a predicted high risk compared to a predicted low risk location was 10.2 (95% CI 4.2–22.8). This study provides evidence that a ‘one size fits all’ approach is unlikely to yield optimal results when making programmatic decisions based on model predictions. Instead, model assumptions and definitions should be tailored to each situation based on the objective of the surveillance program. When predictions are used in the context of the program objectives, they can result in a dramatic improvement in the efficiency of locating infected individuals.Helen J. MayfieldHugh SturrockBenjamin F. ArnoldRicardo Andrade-PachecoTherese KearnsPatricia GravesTake NaseriRobert ThomsenKatherine GassColleen L. LauNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Helen J. Mayfield
Hugh Sturrock
Benjamin F. Arnold
Ricardo Andrade-Pacheco
Therese Kearns
Patricia Graves
Take Naseri
Robert Thomsen
Katherine Gass
Colleen L. Lau
Supporting elimination of lymphatic filariasis in Samoa by predicting locations of residual infection using machine learning and geostatistics
description Abstract The global elimination of lymphatic filariasis (LF) is a major focus of the World Health Organization. One key challenge is locating residual infections that can perpetuate the transmission cycle. We show how a targeted sampling strategy using predictions from a geospatial model, combining random forests and geostatistics, can improve the sampling efficiency for identifying locations with high infection prevalence. Predictions were made based on the household locations of infected persons identified from previous surveys, and environmental variables relevant to mosquito density. Results show that targeting sampling using model predictions would have allowed 52% of infections to be identified by sampling just 17.7% of households. The odds ratio for identifying an infected individual in a household at a predicted high risk compared to a predicted low risk location was 10.2 (95% CI 4.2–22.8). This study provides evidence that a ‘one size fits all’ approach is unlikely to yield optimal results when making programmatic decisions based on model predictions. Instead, model assumptions and definitions should be tailored to each situation based on the objective of the surveillance program. When predictions are used in the context of the program objectives, they can result in a dramatic improvement in the efficiency of locating infected individuals.
format article
author Helen J. Mayfield
Hugh Sturrock
Benjamin F. Arnold
Ricardo Andrade-Pacheco
Therese Kearns
Patricia Graves
Take Naseri
Robert Thomsen
Katherine Gass
Colleen L. Lau
author_facet Helen J. Mayfield
Hugh Sturrock
Benjamin F. Arnold
Ricardo Andrade-Pacheco
Therese Kearns
Patricia Graves
Take Naseri
Robert Thomsen
Katherine Gass
Colleen L. Lau
author_sort Helen J. Mayfield
title Supporting elimination of lymphatic filariasis in Samoa by predicting locations of residual infection using machine learning and geostatistics
title_short Supporting elimination of lymphatic filariasis in Samoa by predicting locations of residual infection using machine learning and geostatistics
title_full Supporting elimination of lymphatic filariasis in Samoa by predicting locations of residual infection using machine learning and geostatistics
title_fullStr Supporting elimination of lymphatic filariasis in Samoa by predicting locations of residual infection using machine learning and geostatistics
title_full_unstemmed Supporting elimination of lymphatic filariasis in Samoa by predicting locations of residual infection using machine learning and geostatistics
title_sort supporting elimination of lymphatic filariasis in samoa by predicting locations of residual infection using machine learning and geostatistics
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/cb04387885e54caa9663c31ec57feff6
work_keys_str_mv AT helenjmayfield supportingeliminationoflymphaticfilariasisinsamoabypredictinglocationsofresidualinfectionusingmachinelearningandgeostatistics
AT hughsturrock supportingeliminationoflymphaticfilariasisinsamoabypredictinglocationsofresidualinfectionusingmachinelearningandgeostatistics
AT benjaminfarnold supportingeliminationoflymphaticfilariasisinsamoabypredictinglocationsofresidualinfectionusingmachinelearningandgeostatistics
AT ricardoandradepacheco supportingeliminationoflymphaticfilariasisinsamoabypredictinglocationsofresidualinfectionusingmachinelearningandgeostatistics
AT theresekearns supportingeliminationoflymphaticfilariasisinsamoabypredictinglocationsofresidualinfectionusingmachinelearningandgeostatistics
AT patriciagraves supportingeliminationoflymphaticfilariasisinsamoabypredictinglocationsofresidualinfectionusingmachinelearningandgeostatistics
AT takenaseri supportingeliminationoflymphaticfilariasisinsamoabypredictinglocationsofresidualinfectionusingmachinelearningandgeostatistics
AT robertthomsen supportingeliminationoflymphaticfilariasisinsamoabypredictinglocationsofresidualinfectionusingmachinelearningandgeostatistics
AT katherinegass supportingeliminationoflymphaticfilariasisinsamoabypredictinglocationsofresidualinfectionusingmachinelearningandgeostatistics
AT colleenllau supportingeliminationoflymphaticfilariasisinsamoabypredictinglocationsofresidualinfectionusingmachinelearningandgeostatistics
_version_ 1718387839698206720