Experimental and Numerical Comparison of Impact Behavior between Thermoplastic and Thermoset Composite for Wind Turbine Blades
Damage generated due to low velocity impact in composite plates was evaluated focusing on the design and structural integrity of wind turbine blades. Impact properties of composite plates manufactured with thermoplastic and thermoset resins for different energy levels were measured and compared. Spe...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/cb13f37492f74e44b0045d9dffb6a90f |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:cb13f37492f74e44b0045d9dffb6a90f |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:cb13f37492f74e44b0045d9dffb6a90f2021-11-11T17:57:08ZExperimental and Numerical Comparison of Impact Behavior between Thermoplastic and Thermoset Composite for Wind Turbine Blades10.3390/ma142163771996-1944https://doaj.org/article/cb13f37492f74e44b0045d9dffb6a90f2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/21/6377https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1944Damage generated due to low velocity impact in composite plates was evaluated focusing on the design and structural integrity of wind turbine blades. Impact properties of composite plates manufactured with thermoplastic and thermoset resins for different energy levels were measured and compared. Specimens were fabricated using VARTM (vacuum assisted resin transfer molding), using both matrix systems in conjunction with carbon, glass and carbon/glass hybrid fibers in the NCF (non-crimp fabric) architecture. Resin systems used were ELIUM 188O (thermoplastic) from Arkema Co., Ltd. and a standard epoxy reference, EPR-L20 from Hexion Co., Ltd. (thermoset). Auxiliary numerical finite element analyses were performed to better understand the tests physics. These models were then compared with the experimental results to verify their predictive capacity, given the intrinsic limitations due to their simplicity. Based in the presented results, it is possible to observe that ELIUM is capable to replace a conventional thermoset matrix. The thermoplastic panels presented similar results compared to its thermoset counterparts, with even a trend of less impact damage. Additionally, for both thermoplastic and thermoset resin systems, glass layups showed the lowest levels of damage while carbon panels presented the highest damage levels. Hybrid laminates can be applied as a compromise solution.Thiago Henrique Lara PintoWaseem GulLibardo Andrés González TorresCarlos Alberto CiminiSung Kyu HaMDPI AGarticlewind turbine bladeselium thermoplastic matriximpacthybrid compositesNCF (non-crimp fabric)VA-RTM (vacuum assisted resin transfer molding)TechnologyTElectrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineeringTK1-9971Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040MicroscopyQH201-278.5Descriptive and experimental mechanicsQC120-168.85ENMaterials, Vol 14, Iss 6377, p 6377 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
wind turbine blades elium thermoplastic matrix impact hybrid composites NCF (non-crimp fabric) VA-RTM (vacuum assisted resin transfer molding) Technology T Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering TK1-9971 Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Microscopy QH201-278.5 Descriptive and experimental mechanics QC120-168.85 |
spellingShingle |
wind turbine blades elium thermoplastic matrix impact hybrid composites NCF (non-crimp fabric) VA-RTM (vacuum assisted resin transfer molding) Technology T Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering TK1-9971 Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Microscopy QH201-278.5 Descriptive and experimental mechanics QC120-168.85 Thiago Henrique Lara Pinto Waseem Gul Libardo Andrés González Torres Carlos Alberto Cimini Sung Kyu Ha Experimental and Numerical Comparison of Impact Behavior between Thermoplastic and Thermoset Composite for Wind Turbine Blades |
description |
Damage generated due to low velocity impact in composite plates was evaluated focusing on the design and structural integrity of wind turbine blades. Impact properties of composite plates manufactured with thermoplastic and thermoset resins for different energy levels were measured and compared. Specimens were fabricated using VARTM (vacuum assisted resin transfer molding), using both matrix systems in conjunction with carbon, glass and carbon/glass hybrid fibers in the NCF (non-crimp fabric) architecture. Resin systems used were ELIUM 188O (thermoplastic) from Arkema Co., Ltd. and a standard epoxy reference, EPR-L20 from Hexion Co., Ltd. (thermoset). Auxiliary numerical finite element analyses were performed to better understand the tests physics. These models were then compared with the experimental results to verify their predictive capacity, given the intrinsic limitations due to their simplicity. Based in the presented results, it is possible to observe that ELIUM is capable to replace a conventional thermoset matrix. The thermoplastic panels presented similar results compared to its thermoset counterparts, with even a trend of less impact damage. Additionally, for both thermoplastic and thermoset resin systems, glass layups showed the lowest levels of damage while carbon panels presented the highest damage levels. Hybrid laminates can be applied as a compromise solution. |
format |
article |
author |
Thiago Henrique Lara Pinto Waseem Gul Libardo Andrés González Torres Carlos Alberto Cimini Sung Kyu Ha |
author_facet |
Thiago Henrique Lara Pinto Waseem Gul Libardo Andrés González Torres Carlos Alberto Cimini Sung Kyu Ha |
author_sort |
Thiago Henrique Lara Pinto |
title |
Experimental and Numerical Comparison of Impact Behavior between Thermoplastic and Thermoset Composite for Wind Turbine Blades |
title_short |
Experimental and Numerical Comparison of Impact Behavior between Thermoplastic and Thermoset Composite for Wind Turbine Blades |
title_full |
Experimental and Numerical Comparison of Impact Behavior between Thermoplastic and Thermoset Composite for Wind Turbine Blades |
title_fullStr |
Experimental and Numerical Comparison of Impact Behavior between Thermoplastic and Thermoset Composite for Wind Turbine Blades |
title_full_unstemmed |
Experimental and Numerical Comparison of Impact Behavior between Thermoplastic and Thermoset Composite for Wind Turbine Blades |
title_sort |
experimental and numerical comparison of impact behavior between thermoplastic and thermoset composite for wind turbine blades |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/cb13f37492f74e44b0045d9dffb6a90f |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT thiagohenriquelarapinto experimentalandnumericalcomparisonofimpactbehaviorbetweenthermoplasticandthermosetcompositeforwindturbineblades AT waseemgul experimentalandnumericalcomparisonofimpactbehaviorbetweenthermoplasticandthermosetcompositeforwindturbineblades AT libardoandresgonzaleztorres experimentalandnumericalcomparisonofimpactbehaviorbetweenthermoplasticandthermosetcompositeforwindturbineblades AT carlosalbertocimini experimentalandnumericalcomparisonofimpactbehaviorbetweenthermoplasticandthermosetcompositeforwindturbineblades AT sungkyuha experimentalandnumericalcomparisonofimpactbehaviorbetweenthermoplasticandthermosetcompositeforwindturbineblades |
_version_ |
1718431968270483456 |