AN ATTEMPT TO IDENTIFY CULTURAL ECOSYSTEM SERVICES AND RELATED LAND USE TYPES IN RURAL AREAS UNDER URBANIZATION

Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) play an important role in socio-natural ecosystems. Assessment of CES in rural areas is crucial for development planning and decision-making. However, assessment of CES at the local scale and, in particular, rural areas remain under-researched. In order to reveal th...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xuehui Sun, Kun Zhang, Xiaozheng Zhang, Renqing Wang, Jian Liu, Shuping Zhang
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Zibeline International 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/cb17d9c71e2a46adbcc680f8af980310
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:cb17d9c71e2a46adbcc680f8af980310
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:cb17d9c71e2a46adbcc680f8af9803102021-11-24T04:06:37ZAN ATTEMPT TO IDENTIFY CULTURAL ECOSYSTEM SERVICES AND RELATED LAND USE TYPES IN RURAL AREAS UNDER URBANIZATION10.26480/ees.02.2021.121.1282521-08822521-0483https://doaj.org/article/cb17d9c71e2a46adbcc680f8af9803102021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://environecosystem.com/archives/2ees2021/2ees2021-121-128.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2521-0882https://doaj.org/toc/2521-0483Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) play an important role in socio-natural ecosystems. Assessment of CES in rural areas is crucial for development planning and decision-making. However, assessment of CES at the local scale and, in particular, rural areas remain under-researched. In order to reveal the importance of different kinds of CES and the related land uses perceived by the rural residents, a simplified tick-scoring method was developed and tested in a case study of four villages in Shandong Province, China. This method poses CES questions and seeks answers about corresponding land use types in a questionnaire form that is accessible and useful to village residents. Furthermore, the important categories of CES and related land use types were identified and ranked based on the questionnaire. The results showed that ecological culture and aesthetic services ranked in the top two of twelve CES categories, while scenic spots/mountains, forests, and lakes/rivers/reservoirs scored for multiple CES and attained higher than average CES scores. Overall, the simplified method is practical to understand the perspectives of rural residents on the important CES and related landscapes. The established approach shed lights on CES assessment and management improvement at local scale of rural areas under different socio-environmental contexts in China and elsewhere.Xuehui SunKun ZhangXiaozheng ZhangRenqing WangJian LiuShuping ZhangZibeline Internationalarticlechinacultural ecosystem servicesecosystem servicesland userural areaEnvironmental sciencesGE1-350ENEnvironment & Ecosystem Science, Vol 5, Iss 2, Pp 121-128 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic china
cultural ecosystem services
ecosystem services
land use
rural area
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
spellingShingle china
cultural ecosystem services
ecosystem services
land use
rural area
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Xuehui Sun
Kun Zhang
Xiaozheng Zhang
Renqing Wang
Jian Liu
Shuping Zhang
AN ATTEMPT TO IDENTIFY CULTURAL ECOSYSTEM SERVICES AND RELATED LAND USE TYPES IN RURAL AREAS UNDER URBANIZATION
description Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) play an important role in socio-natural ecosystems. Assessment of CES in rural areas is crucial for development planning and decision-making. However, assessment of CES at the local scale and, in particular, rural areas remain under-researched. In order to reveal the importance of different kinds of CES and the related land uses perceived by the rural residents, a simplified tick-scoring method was developed and tested in a case study of four villages in Shandong Province, China. This method poses CES questions and seeks answers about corresponding land use types in a questionnaire form that is accessible and useful to village residents. Furthermore, the important categories of CES and related land use types were identified and ranked based on the questionnaire. The results showed that ecological culture and aesthetic services ranked in the top two of twelve CES categories, while scenic spots/mountains, forests, and lakes/rivers/reservoirs scored for multiple CES and attained higher than average CES scores. Overall, the simplified method is practical to understand the perspectives of rural residents on the important CES and related landscapes. The established approach shed lights on CES assessment and management improvement at local scale of rural areas under different socio-environmental contexts in China and elsewhere.
format article
author Xuehui Sun
Kun Zhang
Xiaozheng Zhang
Renqing Wang
Jian Liu
Shuping Zhang
author_facet Xuehui Sun
Kun Zhang
Xiaozheng Zhang
Renqing Wang
Jian Liu
Shuping Zhang
author_sort Xuehui Sun
title AN ATTEMPT TO IDENTIFY CULTURAL ECOSYSTEM SERVICES AND RELATED LAND USE TYPES IN RURAL AREAS UNDER URBANIZATION
title_short AN ATTEMPT TO IDENTIFY CULTURAL ECOSYSTEM SERVICES AND RELATED LAND USE TYPES IN RURAL AREAS UNDER URBANIZATION
title_full AN ATTEMPT TO IDENTIFY CULTURAL ECOSYSTEM SERVICES AND RELATED LAND USE TYPES IN RURAL AREAS UNDER URBANIZATION
title_fullStr AN ATTEMPT TO IDENTIFY CULTURAL ECOSYSTEM SERVICES AND RELATED LAND USE TYPES IN RURAL AREAS UNDER URBANIZATION
title_full_unstemmed AN ATTEMPT TO IDENTIFY CULTURAL ECOSYSTEM SERVICES AND RELATED LAND USE TYPES IN RURAL AREAS UNDER URBANIZATION
title_sort attempt to identify cultural ecosystem services and related land use types in rural areas under urbanization
publisher Zibeline International
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/cb17d9c71e2a46adbcc680f8af980310
work_keys_str_mv AT xuehuisun anattempttoidentifyculturalecosystemservicesandrelatedlandusetypesinruralareasunderurbanization
AT kunzhang anattempttoidentifyculturalecosystemservicesandrelatedlandusetypesinruralareasunderurbanization
AT xiaozhengzhang anattempttoidentifyculturalecosystemservicesandrelatedlandusetypesinruralareasunderurbanization
AT renqingwang anattempttoidentifyculturalecosystemservicesandrelatedlandusetypesinruralareasunderurbanization
AT jianliu anattempttoidentifyculturalecosystemservicesandrelatedlandusetypesinruralareasunderurbanization
AT shupingzhang anattempttoidentifyculturalecosystemservicesandrelatedlandusetypesinruralareasunderurbanization
AT xuehuisun attempttoidentifyculturalecosystemservicesandrelatedlandusetypesinruralareasunderurbanization
AT kunzhang attempttoidentifyculturalecosystemservicesandrelatedlandusetypesinruralareasunderurbanization
AT xiaozhengzhang attempttoidentifyculturalecosystemservicesandrelatedlandusetypesinruralareasunderurbanization
AT renqingwang attempttoidentifyculturalecosystemservicesandrelatedlandusetypesinruralareasunderurbanization
AT jianliu attempttoidentifyculturalecosystemservicesandrelatedlandusetypesinruralareasunderurbanization
AT shupingzhang attempttoidentifyculturalecosystemservicesandrelatedlandusetypesinruralareasunderurbanization
_version_ 1718416059609907200