Islam and Human Rights

Professor Mayer' second edition of her Islam and Human Rights, like the ftrst edition, aims essentially to study comparatively "selected civil and political rights formulations in international law and in actual and proposed rights schemes purporting to embody Islamic principles, with a c...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ahmad Moussalli
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: International Institute of Islamic Thought 1997
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/cb1ddf8bf6cb457fa9698c9ab034316e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:cb1ddf8bf6cb457fa9698c9ab034316e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:cb1ddf8bf6cb457fa9698c9ab034316e2021-12-02T19:22:42ZIslam and Human Rights10.35632/ajis.v14i3.22752690-37332690-3741https://doaj.org/article/cb1ddf8bf6cb457fa9698c9ab034316e1997-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ajis.org/index.php/ajiss/article/view/2275https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3733https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3741 Professor Mayer' second edition of her Islam and Human Rights, like the ftrst edition, aims essentially to study comparatively "selected civil and political rights formulations in international law and in actual and proposed rights schemes purporting to embody Islamic principles, with a critical appraisal of the latter in terms of international law and Islamic jurisprudence" (p. xi). While acknowledging that the title of her book is misleading (because it is not only Islam that determines a Muslim's attitude), by the end of the book the reader finds that the different conservative interpretations of Islam that developed during the Middle Ages and are kept within authoritacjve books of jurisprudence are made responsible for Muslims’ dealing with human rights issues. However, the author does not elaborate much on the repression of secular regimes, which adhere neither to international human rights nor to medieval Islamic legal thinking. The question then relates not to Islam as such, but to the nature of politics that is being exercised, whether in the name of Islam or secularism. Mayer is emphatic in not attributing repression to Islam and is very keen to recognize the multiplicity of ideas and trends within the Islamic world today toward the issues of human rights. But what unifies these different trends is their heavy reliance on religious principles of Islamic sources-meaning medieval books of jurisprudence and not the Qur’an or the Sunnah. For Islam, whatever that may mean to the author, is used for both political protest against undemocratic regimes and for repression by these regimes. In other words, Islam has not specified what is equivalent to international human rights and has no proper scheme for human rights. But had the author looked at the original texts of the Qur’an and the Sunnah, she could have developed a scheme of rights that then could be compared to the international human rights standards. Again, the medieval Islamic literature is not devoid of a scheme of rights, though they may not be exactly what she wants to label as a scheme of human rights ... Ahmad MoussalliInternational Institute of Islamic ThoughtarticleIslamBP1-253ENAmerican Journal of Islam and Society, Vol 14, Iss 3 (1997)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Islam
BP1-253
spellingShingle Islam
BP1-253
Ahmad Moussalli
Islam and Human Rights
description Professor Mayer' second edition of her Islam and Human Rights, like the ftrst edition, aims essentially to study comparatively "selected civil and political rights formulations in international law and in actual and proposed rights schemes purporting to embody Islamic principles, with a critical appraisal of the latter in terms of international law and Islamic jurisprudence" (p. xi). While acknowledging that the title of her book is misleading (because it is not only Islam that determines a Muslim's attitude), by the end of the book the reader finds that the different conservative interpretations of Islam that developed during the Middle Ages and are kept within authoritacjve books of jurisprudence are made responsible for Muslims’ dealing with human rights issues. However, the author does not elaborate much on the repression of secular regimes, which adhere neither to international human rights nor to medieval Islamic legal thinking. The question then relates not to Islam as such, but to the nature of politics that is being exercised, whether in the name of Islam or secularism. Mayer is emphatic in not attributing repression to Islam and is very keen to recognize the multiplicity of ideas and trends within the Islamic world today toward the issues of human rights. But what unifies these different trends is their heavy reliance on religious principles of Islamic sources-meaning medieval books of jurisprudence and not the Qur’an or the Sunnah. For Islam, whatever that may mean to the author, is used for both political protest against undemocratic regimes and for repression by these regimes. In other words, Islam has not specified what is equivalent to international human rights and has no proper scheme for human rights. But had the author looked at the original texts of the Qur’an and the Sunnah, she could have developed a scheme of rights that then could be compared to the international human rights standards. Again, the medieval Islamic literature is not devoid of a scheme of rights, though they may not be exactly what she wants to label as a scheme of human rights ...
format article
author Ahmad Moussalli
author_facet Ahmad Moussalli
author_sort Ahmad Moussalli
title Islam and Human Rights
title_short Islam and Human Rights
title_full Islam and Human Rights
title_fullStr Islam and Human Rights
title_full_unstemmed Islam and Human Rights
title_sort islam and human rights
publisher International Institute of Islamic Thought
publishDate 1997
url https://doaj.org/article/cb1ddf8bf6cb457fa9698c9ab034316e
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadmoussalli islamandhumanrights
_version_ 1718376704290848768