Innovation, competition and technical efficiency

Contradictory empirical and theoretical evidence on the relationship between innovation and competition has been reconciled in a model that yields an inverted U-shaped curve. I test whether the predictions of the model are supported by the data with an unbalanced panel of firms for 1990–2003 in a hi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Elina Berghäll
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Group 2016
Materias:
tfp
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/cb21271b4c894b83bece5ff07daba7d8
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:cb21271b4c894b83bece5ff07daba7d8
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:cb21271b4c894b83bece5ff07daba7d82021-12-02T14:35:45ZInnovation, competition and technical efficiency2331-197510.1080/23311975.2016.1199522https://doaj.org/article/cb21271b4c894b83bece5ff07daba7d82016-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2016.1199522https://doaj.org/toc/2331-1975Contradictory empirical and theoretical evidence on the relationship between innovation and competition has been reconciled in a model that yields an inverted U-shaped curve. I test whether the predictions of the model are supported by the data with an unbalanced panel of firms for 1990–2003 in a high productivity growth, high-tech industry, Finnish ICT manufacturing. In particular, I investigate how well alternative, yet rigorous measures of innovation and the technology gap, such as R&D intensity, R&D elasticity, technical change, technical efficiency and total factor productivity fare with respect to competition measured by the Lerner index. The results prove sensitive to the choice of variable. Overall, the model is not supported by the empirical evidence of the industry.Elina BerghällTaylor & Francis Grouparticletechnology frontierinverted u-curveefficiencytfpinnovationcompetitionBusinessHF5001-6182Management. Industrial managementHD28-70ENCogent Business & Management, Vol 3, Iss 1 (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic technology frontier
inverted u-curve
efficiency
tfp
innovation
competition
Business
HF5001-6182
Management. Industrial management
HD28-70
spellingShingle technology frontier
inverted u-curve
efficiency
tfp
innovation
competition
Business
HF5001-6182
Management. Industrial management
HD28-70
Elina Berghäll
Innovation, competition and technical efficiency
description Contradictory empirical and theoretical evidence on the relationship between innovation and competition has been reconciled in a model that yields an inverted U-shaped curve. I test whether the predictions of the model are supported by the data with an unbalanced panel of firms for 1990–2003 in a high productivity growth, high-tech industry, Finnish ICT manufacturing. In particular, I investigate how well alternative, yet rigorous measures of innovation and the technology gap, such as R&D intensity, R&D elasticity, technical change, technical efficiency and total factor productivity fare with respect to competition measured by the Lerner index. The results prove sensitive to the choice of variable. Overall, the model is not supported by the empirical evidence of the industry.
format article
author Elina Berghäll
author_facet Elina Berghäll
author_sort Elina Berghäll
title Innovation, competition and technical efficiency
title_short Innovation, competition and technical efficiency
title_full Innovation, competition and technical efficiency
title_fullStr Innovation, competition and technical efficiency
title_full_unstemmed Innovation, competition and technical efficiency
title_sort innovation, competition and technical efficiency
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/cb21271b4c894b83bece5ff07daba7d8
work_keys_str_mv AT elinaberghall innovationcompetitionandtechnicalefficiency
_version_ 1718391098733232128