Comment on ’Effectiveness of 190 μg Fluocinolone Acetonide versus 700 μg Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implants in Diabetic Macular Edema Using the Area-Under-the-Curve Method: The CONSTANT Analysis’ [Response to Letter]
Javier Zarranz-Ventura,1 Joshua O Mali2 1Institut Clínic d’Oftalmología (ICOF), Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain; 2The Eye Associates, Sarasota, FL, USACorrespondence: Javier Zarranz-VenturaInstitut Clínic d’Oftalmología (ICOF), Hospit...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/cb30bb0aa04343109604b98c82bcae47 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | Javier Zarranz-Ventura,1 Joshua O Mali2 1Institut Clínic d’Oftalmología (ICOF), Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain; 2The Eye Associates, Sarasota, FL, USACorrespondence: Javier Zarranz-VenturaInstitut Clínic d’Oftalmología (ICOF), Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, SpainTel +34 932 279 391Email jzarranz@hotmail.com
With interest, we read the letter to the Editor regarding the Effectiveness of 190 μg fluocinolone acetonide versus 700 μg dexamethasone intravitreal implants in diabetic macular edema using the area-under-the-curve method: The CONSTANT analysis by Stewart and Taylor published in Clinical Ophthalmology. The key concerns raised by the authors relate to the design deficiencies of the MEAD studies1 and highlight two specific issues – the six month dosing of the dexamethasone implant and the potentially delayed removal of cataracts.
View the original paper by Zarranz-Ventura and Mali
This is in response to the Letter to the Editor
|
|---|