Comment on ’Effectiveness of 190 μg Fluocinolone Acetonide versus 700 μg Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implants in Diabetic Macular Edema Using the Area-Under-the-Curve Method: The CONSTANT Analysis’ [Response to Letter]

Javier Zarranz-Ventura,1 Joshua O Mali2 1Institut Clínic d’Oftalmología (ICOF), Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain; 2The Eye Associates, Sarasota, FL, USACorrespondence: Javier Zarranz-VenturaInstitut Clínic d’Oftalmología (ICOF), Hospit...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Zarranz-Ventura J, Mali JO
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Dove Medical Press 2020
Materias:	area under the curve best-corrected visual acuity diabetic macular edema corticosteroid fluocinolone acetonide implant dexamethasone implant Ophthalmology RE1-994
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/cb30bb0aa04343109604b98c82bcae47
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:cb30bb0aa04343109604b98c82bcae47
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:cb30bb0aa04343109604b98c82bcae472021-12-02T16:03:02ZComment on ’Effectiveness of 190 μg Fluocinolone Acetonide versus 700 μg Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implants in Diabetic Macular Edema Using the Area-Under-the-Curve Method: The CONSTANT Analysis’ [Response to Letter]1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/cb30bb0aa04343109604b98c82bcae472020-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/comment-on-rsquoeffectiveness-of-190-mug-fluocinolone-acetonide-versus-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Javier Zarranz-Ventura,1 Joshua O Mali2 1Institut Clínic d’Oftalmología (ICOF), Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain; 2The Eye Associates, Sarasota, FL, USACorrespondence: Javier Zarranz-VenturaInstitut Clínic d’Oftalmología (ICOF), Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, SpainTel +34 932 279 391Email jzarranz@hotmail.com With interest, we read the letter to the Editor regarding the Effectiveness of 190 μg fluocinolone acetonide versus 700 μg dexamethasone intravitreal implants in diabetic macular edema using the area-under-the-curve method: The CONSTANT analysis by Stewart and Taylor published in Clinical Ophthalmology. The key concerns raised by the authors relate to the design deficiencies of the MEAD studies1 and highlight two specific issues – the six month dosing of the dexamethasone implant and the potentially delayed removal of cataracts.   View the original paper by Zarranz-Ventura and Mali   This is in response to the Letter to the Editor      Zarranz-Ventura JMali JODove Medical Pressarticlearea under the curvebest-corrected visual acuitydiabetic macular edemacorticosteroidfluocinolone acetonide implantdexamethasone implantOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol Volume 14, Pp 3831-3832 (2020)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	area under the curve best-corrected visual acuity diabetic macular edema corticosteroid fluocinolone acetonide implant dexamethasone implant Ophthalmology RE1-994
spellingShingle	area under the curve best-corrected visual acuity diabetic macular edema corticosteroid fluocinolone acetonide implant dexamethasone implant Ophthalmology RE1-994 Zarranz-Ventura J Mali JO Comment on ’Effectiveness of 190 μg Fluocinolone Acetonide versus 700 μg Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implants in Diabetic Macular Edema Using the Area-Under-the-Curve Method: The CONSTANT Analysis’ [Response to Letter]
description	Javier Zarranz-Ventura,1 Joshua O Mali2 1Institut Clínic d’Oftalmología (ICOF), Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain; 2The Eye Associates, Sarasota, FL, USACorrespondence: Javier Zarranz-VenturaInstitut Clínic d’Oftalmología (ICOF), Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, SpainTel +34 932 279 391Email jzarranz@hotmail.com With interest, we read the letter to the Editor regarding the Effectiveness of 190 μg fluocinolone acetonide versus 700 μg dexamethasone intravitreal implants in diabetic macular edema using the area-under-the-curve method: The CONSTANT analysis by Stewart and Taylor published in Clinical Ophthalmology. The key concerns raised by the authors relate to the design deficiencies of the MEAD studies1 and highlight two specific issues – the six month dosing of the dexamethasone implant and the potentially delayed removal of cataracts.   View the original paper by Zarranz-Ventura and Mali   This is in response to the Letter to the Editor
format	article
author	Zarranz-Ventura J Mali JO
author_facet	Zarranz-Ventura J Mali JO
author_sort	Zarranz-Ventura J
title	Comment on ’Effectiveness of 190 μg Fluocinolone Acetonide versus 700 μg Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implants in Diabetic Macular Edema Using the Area-Under-the-Curve Method: The CONSTANT Analysis’ [Response to Letter]
title_short	Comment on ’Effectiveness of 190 μg Fluocinolone Acetonide versus 700 μg Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implants in Diabetic Macular Edema Using the Area-Under-the-Curve Method: The CONSTANT Analysis’ [Response to Letter]
title_full	Comment on ’Effectiveness of 190 μg Fluocinolone Acetonide versus 700 μg Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implants in Diabetic Macular Edema Using the Area-Under-the-Curve Method: The CONSTANT Analysis’ [Response to Letter]
title_fullStr	Comment on ’Effectiveness of 190 μg Fluocinolone Acetonide versus 700 μg Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implants in Diabetic Macular Edema Using the Area-Under-the-Curve Method: The CONSTANT Analysis’ [Response to Letter]
title_full_unstemmed	Comment on ’Effectiveness of 190 μg Fluocinolone Acetonide versus 700 μg Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implants in Diabetic Macular Edema Using the Area-Under-the-Curve Method: The CONSTANT Analysis’ [Response to Letter]
title_sort	comment on ’effectiveness of 190 μg fluocinolone acetonide versus 700 μg dexamethasone intravitreal implants in diabetic macular edema using the area-under-the-curve method: the constant analysis’ [response to letter]
publisher	Dove Medical Press
publishDate	2020
url	https://doaj.org/article/cb30bb0aa04343109604b98c82bcae47
work_keys_str_mv	AT zarranzventuraj commentonrsquoeffectivenessof190mugfluocinoloneacetonideversus700mugdexamethasoneintravitrealimplantsindiabeticmacularedemausingtheareaunderthecurvemethodtheconstantanalysisrsquoresponsetoletter AT malijo commentonrsquoeffectivenessof190mugfluocinoloneacetonideversus700mugdexamethasoneintravitrealimplantsindiabeticmacularedemausingtheareaunderthecurvemethodtheconstantanalysisrsquoresponsetoletter
_version_	1718385299168428032

Comment on &rsquo;Effectiveness of 190 &mu;g Fluocinolone Acetonide versus 700 &mu;g Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implants in Diabetic Macular Edema Using the Area-Under-the-Curve Method: The CONSTANT Analysis&rsquo; [Response to Letter]

Ejemplares similares

Comment on ’Effectiveness of 190 μg Fluocinolone Acetonide versus 700 μg Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implants in Diabetic Macular Edema Using the Area-Under-the-Curve Method: The CONSTANT Analysis’ [Response to Letter]