Author Correction: Saliva is more sensitive than nasopharyngeal or nasal swabs for diagnosis of asymptomatic and mild COVID-19 infection
An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Alvin Kuo Jing Teo, Yukti Choudhury, Iain Beehuat Tan, Chae Yin Cher, Shi Hao Chew, Zi Yi Wan, Lionel Tim Ee Cheng, Lynette Lin Ean Oon, Min Han Tan, Kian Sing Chan, Li Yang Hsu |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/cb4e26834d474d8f9f975f0db436942d |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Saliva is more sensitive than nasopharyngeal or nasal swabs for diagnosis of asymptomatic and mild COVID-19 infection
por: Alvin Kuo Jing Teo, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Saliva is superior over nasopharyngeal swab for detecting SARS-CoV2 in COVID-19 patients
por: Getachew Tesfaye Beyene, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Equivalent SARS-CoV-2 viral loads by PCR between nasopharyngeal swab and saliva in symptomatic patients
por: Isao Yokota, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Quantitation of the cellular content of saliva and buccal swab samples
por: Christiane Theda, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Differences in the bacteriome of swab, saliva, and tissue biopsies in oral cancer
por: Divya Gopinath, et al.
Publicado: (2021)