Eksistensi Komisi Yudisial dalam Pengawasan Hakim (Tinjauan Yuridis dan Hukum Islam terhadap Undang-Undang No. 18 tahun 2011)

This study aims to analyze the existence of the judicial commission on the supervision of judges in Law no. 18 of 2011 concerning the Judicial Commission. The research method used in this study is a qualitative method using a literature study approach. The main data source used is Law no. 18 of 2011...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Indra Utama Tanjung
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	ID
Publicado:	Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Serdang Lubuk Pakam 2021
Materias:	judicial commission judge court law Islam BP1-253
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/cb6e10bee61f4d51ab478c197d1ede9b
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:cb6e10bee61f4d51ab478c197d1ede9b
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:cb6e10bee61f4d51ab478c197d1ede9b2021-11-10T06:40:43ZEksistensi Komisi Yudisial dalam Pengawasan Hakim (Tinjauan Yuridis dan Hukum Islam terhadap Undang-Undang No. 18 tahun 2011)1978-13262721-439710.51672/alfikru.v15i2.52https://doaj.org/article/cb6e10bee61f4d51ab478c197d1ede9b2021-07-01T00:00:00Zhttp://jurnal.staiserdanglubukpakam.ac.id/index.php/alfikru/article/view/52https://doaj.org/toc/1978-1326https://doaj.org/toc/2721-4397This study aims to analyze the existence of the judicial commission on the supervision of judges in Law no. 18 of 2011 concerning the Judicial Commission. The research method used in this study is a qualitative method using a literature study approach. The main data source used is Law no. 18 of 2011 concerning the Judicial Commission and the Law on Amendments to Law Number 22 of 2004 concerning the Judicial Commission. Data analysis is carried out by comparing the existence of the judicial commission from the two legal sources, and then drawing conclusions about the existence of the judicial commission, and its function of supervising judges. The results of the study indicate that the change to Law No. 22 of 2004 is the answer to the ambiguity of the duties, authorities and functions of the Judicial Commission, because it is not clear enough what is meant by "other powers in order to maintain and uphold honor, dignity, and behavior". judge." The problem becomes clearer, if the other authority is interpreted as supervision, because in the laws and regulations there are other institutions (besides the Judicial Commission) which are given the authority to carry out supervision. It is also in the context of maintaining and upholding the honor, nobility of dignity, and the behavior of judges is supervision.Indra Utama TanjungSekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Serdang Lubuk Pakamarticlejudicial commissionjudgecourtlawIslamBP1-253IDAl-Fikru, Vol 15, Iss 2, Pp 65-77 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	ID
topic	judicial commission judge court law Islam BP1-253
spellingShingle	judicial commission judge court law Islam BP1-253 Indra Utama Tanjung Eksistensi Komisi Yudisial dalam Pengawasan Hakim (Tinjauan Yuridis dan Hukum Islam terhadap Undang-Undang No. 18 tahun 2011)
description	This study aims to analyze the existence of the judicial commission on the supervision of judges in Law no. 18 of 2011 concerning the Judicial Commission. The research method used in this study is a qualitative method using a literature study approach. The main data source used is Law no. 18 of 2011 concerning the Judicial Commission and the Law on Amendments to Law Number 22 of 2004 concerning the Judicial Commission. Data analysis is carried out by comparing the existence of the judicial commission from the two legal sources, and then drawing conclusions about the existence of the judicial commission, and its function of supervising judges. The results of the study indicate that the change to Law No. 22 of 2004 is the answer to the ambiguity of the duties, authorities and functions of the Judicial Commission, because it is not clear enough what is meant by "other powers in order to maintain and uphold honor, dignity, and behavior". judge." The problem becomes clearer, if the other authority is interpreted as supervision, because in the laws and regulations there are other institutions (besides the Judicial Commission) which are given the authority to carry out supervision. It is also in the context of maintaining and upholding the honor, nobility of dignity, and the behavior of judges is supervision.
format	article
author	Indra Utama Tanjung
author_facet	Indra Utama Tanjung
author_sort	Indra Utama Tanjung
title	Eksistensi Komisi Yudisial dalam Pengawasan Hakim (Tinjauan Yuridis dan Hukum Islam terhadap Undang-Undang No. 18 tahun 2011)
title_short	Eksistensi Komisi Yudisial dalam Pengawasan Hakim (Tinjauan Yuridis dan Hukum Islam terhadap Undang-Undang No. 18 tahun 2011)
title_full	Eksistensi Komisi Yudisial dalam Pengawasan Hakim (Tinjauan Yuridis dan Hukum Islam terhadap Undang-Undang No. 18 tahun 2011)
title_fullStr	Eksistensi Komisi Yudisial dalam Pengawasan Hakim (Tinjauan Yuridis dan Hukum Islam terhadap Undang-Undang No. 18 tahun 2011)
title_full_unstemmed	Eksistensi Komisi Yudisial dalam Pengawasan Hakim (Tinjauan Yuridis dan Hukum Islam terhadap Undang-Undang No. 18 tahun 2011)
title_sort	eksistensi komisi yudisial dalam pengawasan hakim (tinjauan yuridis dan hukum islam terhadap undang-undang no. 18 tahun 2011)
publisher	Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Serdang Lubuk Pakam
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/cb6e10bee61f4d51ab478c197d1ede9b
work_keys_str_mv	AT indrautamatanjung eksistensikomisiyudisialdalampengawasanhakimtinjauanyuridisdanhukumislamterhadapundangundangno18tahun2011
_version_	1718440510851383296

Eksistensi Komisi Yudisial dalam Pengawasan Hakim (Tinjauan Yuridis dan Hukum Islam terhadap Undang-Undang No. 18 tahun 2011)

Ejemplares similares