The Effects of Running Compared with Functional High-Intensity Interval Training on Body Composition and Aerobic Fitness in Female University Students

High-intensity interval running (HIIT-R) and high-intensity functional training (HIFT) are two forms of HIIT exercise that are commonly used. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of HIFT on aerobic capacity and body composition when compared to HIIT-R in females. Twenty healthy, un...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yining Lu, Huw D. Wiltshire, Julien S. Baker, Qiaojun Wang
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/cba7c5f6b1d04c6ea96bdc4386bd5bff
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:cba7c5f6b1d04c6ea96bdc4386bd5bff
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:cba7c5f6b1d04c6ea96bdc4386bd5bff2021-11-11T16:27:40ZThe Effects of Running Compared with Functional High-Intensity Interval Training on Body Composition and Aerobic Fitness in Female University Students10.3390/ijerph1821113121660-46011661-7827https://doaj.org/article/cba7c5f6b1d04c6ea96bdc4386bd5bff2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11312https://doaj.org/toc/1661-7827https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601High-intensity interval running (HIIT-R) and high-intensity functional training (HIFT) are two forms of HIIT exercise that are commonly used. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of HIFT on aerobic capacity and body composition when compared to HIIT-R in females. Twenty healthy, untrained female university students (age 20.5 ± 0.7 year) were randomly assigned to a 12-week HIIT-R or HIFT intervention. The HIIT-R group involved a 30 s maximal shuttle run with a 30 s recovery period, whereas the HIFT involved multiple functional exercises with a 2:1 work-active recovery ratio. Body composition, VO<sub>2</sub>max, and muscle performance were measured before and post intervention. As a result, HIIT-R and HIIT-F stimulated similar improvements in VO<sub>2</sub>max (17.1% ± 5.6% and 12.7% ± 6.7%, respectively, <i>p</i> > 0.05). Only the HIIT-F group revealed significant improvements in muscle performance (sit-ups, 16.5% ± 3.1%, standing broad jump 5.1% ± 2.2%, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Body fat percentage decreased (17.1% ± 7.4% and 12.6% ± 5.1%, respectively, <i>p</i> < 0.05) in both HIIT-R and HIIT-F with no between-group differences. We concluded that HIFT was equally effective in promoting body composition and aerobic fitness compared to HIIT-R. HIFT resulted in improved muscle performance, whereas the HIIT-R protocol demonstrated no gains.Yining LuHuw D. WiltshireJulien S. BakerQiaojun WangMDPI AGarticlehigh-intensity interval traininghigh-intensity functional trainingbody compositionaerobic fitnessmuscle performanceMedicineRENInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol 18, Iss 11312, p 11312 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic high-intensity interval training
high-intensity functional training
body composition
aerobic fitness
muscle performance
Medicine
R
spellingShingle high-intensity interval training
high-intensity functional training
body composition
aerobic fitness
muscle performance
Medicine
R
Yining Lu
Huw D. Wiltshire
Julien S. Baker
Qiaojun Wang
The Effects of Running Compared with Functional High-Intensity Interval Training on Body Composition and Aerobic Fitness in Female University Students
description High-intensity interval running (HIIT-R) and high-intensity functional training (HIFT) are two forms of HIIT exercise that are commonly used. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of HIFT on aerobic capacity and body composition when compared to HIIT-R in females. Twenty healthy, untrained female university students (age 20.5 ± 0.7 year) were randomly assigned to a 12-week HIIT-R or HIFT intervention. The HIIT-R group involved a 30 s maximal shuttle run with a 30 s recovery period, whereas the HIFT involved multiple functional exercises with a 2:1 work-active recovery ratio. Body composition, VO<sub>2</sub>max, and muscle performance were measured before and post intervention. As a result, HIIT-R and HIIT-F stimulated similar improvements in VO<sub>2</sub>max (17.1% ± 5.6% and 12.7% ± 6.7%, respectively, <i>p</i> > 0.05). Only the HIIT-F group revealed significant improvements in muscle performance (sit-ups, 16.5% ± 3.1%, standing broad jump 5.1% ± 2.2%, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Body fat percentage decreased (17.1% ± 7.4% and 12.6% ± 5.1%, respectively, <i>p</i> < 0.05) in both HIIT-R and HIIT-F with no between-group differences. We concluded that HIFT was equally effective in promoting body composition and aerobic fitness compared to HIIT-R. HIFT resulted in improved muscle performance, whereas the HIIT-R protocol demonstrated no gains.
format article
author Yining Lu
Huw D. Wiltshire
Julien S. Baker
Qiaojun Wang
author_facet Yining Lu
Huw D. Wiltshire
Julien S. Baker
Qiaojun Wang
author_sort Yining Lu
title The Effects of Running Compared with Functional High-Intensity Interval Training on Body Composition and Aerobic Fitness in Female University Students
title_short The Effects of Running Compared with Functional High-Intensity Interval Training on Body Composition and Aerobic Fitness in Female University Students
title_full The Effects of Running Compared with Functional High-Intensity Interval Training on Body Composition and Aerobic Fitness in Female University Students
title_fullStr The Effects of Running Compared with Functional High-Intensity Interval Training on Body Composition and Aerobic Fitness in Female University Students
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Running Compared with Functional High-Intensity Interval Training on Body Composition and Aerobic Fitness in Female University Students
title_sort effects of running compared with functional high-intensity interval training on body composition and aerobic fitness in female university students
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/cba7c5f6b1d04c6ea96bdc4386bd5bff
work_keys_str_mv AT yininglu theeffectsofrunningcomparedwithfunctionalhighintensityintervaltrainingonbodycompositionandaerobicfitnessinfemaleuniversitystudents
AT huwdwiltshire theeffectsofrunningcomparedwithfunctionalhighintensityintervaltrainingonbodycompositionandaerobicfitnessinfemaleuniversitystudents
AT juliensbaker theeffectsofrunningcomparedwithfunctionalhighintensityintervaltrainingonbodycompositionandaerobicfitnessinfemaleuniversitystudents
AT qiaojunwang theeffectsofrunningcomparedwithfunctionalhighintensityintervaltrainingonbodycompositionandaerobicfitnessinfemaleuniversitystudents
AT yininglu effectsofrunningcomparedwithfunctionalhighintensityintervaltrainingonbodycompositionandaerobicfitnessinfemaleuniversitystudents
AT huwdwiltshire effectsofrunningcomparedwithfunctionalhighintensityintervaltrainingonbodycompositionandaerobicfitnessinfemaleuniversitystudents
AT juliensbaker effectsofrunningcomparedwithfunctionalhighintensityintervaltrainingonbodycompositionandaerobicfitnessinfemaleuniversitystudents
AT qiaojunwang effectsofrunningcomparedwithfunctionalhighintensityintervaltrainingonbodycompositionandaerobicfitnessinfemaleuniversitystudents
_version_ 1718432322928246784