A review of crosstalk research for plasmonic waveguides

Plasmonic waveguides, as a competitive candidate, have been widely studied in rapid developing photonic integrated circuits (PICs) and optical interconnection fields. However, crosstalk between plasmonic waveguides is a critical issue that has to be considered in practice. Actually, crosstalk domina...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma Junxian, Zeng Dezheng, Yang Yatao, Pan Can, Zhang Li, Xu Haidon
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Institue of Optics and Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/cbc40da5488b476091254c94ca92aef6
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:cbc40da5488b476091254c94ca92aef6
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:cbc40da5488b476091254c94ca92aef62021-11-11T09:53:45ZA review of crosstalk research for plasmonic waveguides2096-457910.29026/oea.2019.180022https://doaj.org/article/cbc40da5488b476091254c94ca92aef62019-04-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.oejournal.org/article/doi/10.29026/oea.2019.180022https://doaj.org/toc/2096-4579Plasmonic waveguides, as a competitive candidate, have been widely studied in rapid developing photonic integrated circuits (PICs) and optical interconnection fields. However, crosstalk between plasmonic waveguides is a critical issue that has to be considered in practice. Actually, crosstalk dominates the ultimate integration density of the planar photonic circuits. This paper reviews the recent research work on evaluation methods and crosstalk suppression approaches of plasmonic waveguides. Three crosstalk evaluation methods based on comparison of specific parameters of waveguides have been summarized. Furthermore, four specific approaches to reduce crosstalk have been illustrated as two categories according to their impacts on waveguide performances and the whole circuit. One means of crosstalk suppression is changing the placement of waveguides, which could maintain the transmission characteristics of the original waveguide. The other means is inserting medium, which has the advantage of occupying smaller space compared to the first method. Consequently, to suppress crosstalk between plasmonic waveguides, one should choose suitable approach.Ma JunxianZeng DezhengYang YataoPan CanZhang LiXu HaidonInstitue of Optics and Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciencesarticlecrosstalksurface plasmonsguided wavesphotonic integrated circuitsoptical interconnectionOptics. LightQC350-467ENOpto-Electronic Advances, Vol 2, Iss 4, Pp 180022-1-180022-8 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic crosstalk
surface plasmons
guided waves
photonic integrated circuits
optical interconnection
Optics. Light
QC350-467
spellingShingle crosstalk
surface plasmons
guided waves
photonic integrated circuits
optical interconnection
Optics. Light
QC350-467
Ma Junxian
Zeng Dezheng
Yang Yatao
Pan Can
Zhang Li
Xu Haidon
A review of crosstalk research for plasmonic waveguides
description Plasmonic waveguides, as a competitive candidate, have been widely studied in rapid developing photonic integrated circuits (PICs) and optical interconnection fields. However, crosstalk between plasmonic waveguides is a critical issue that has to be considered in practice. Actually, crosstalk dominates the ultimate integration density of the planar photonic circuits. This paper reviews the recent research work on evaluation methods and crosstalk suppression approaches of plasmonic waveguides. Three crosstalk evaluation methods based on comparison of specific parameters of waveguides have been summarized. Furthermore, four specific approaches to reduce crosstalk have been illustrated as two categories according to their impacts on waveguide performances and the whole circuit. One means of crosstalk suppression is changing the placement of waveguides, which could maintain the transmission characteristics of the original waveguide. The other means is inserting medium, which has the advantage of occupying smaller space compared to the first method. Consequently, to suppress crosstalk between plasmonic waveguides, one should choose suitable approach.
format article
author Ma Junxian
Zeng Dezheng
Yang Yatao
Pan Can
Zhang Li
Xu Haidon
author_facet Ma Junxian
Zeng Dezheng
Yang Yatao
Pan Can
Zhang Li
Xu Haidon
author_sort Ma Junxian
title A review of crosstalk research for plasmonic waveguides
title_short A review of crosstalk research for plasmonic waveguides
title_full A review of crosstalk research for plasmonic waveguides
title_fullStr A review of crosstalk research for plasmonic waveguides
title_full_unstemmed A review of crosstalk research for plasmonic waveguides
title_sort review of crosstalk research for plasmonic waveguides
publisher Institue of Optics and Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/cbc40da5488b476091254c94ca92aef6
work_keys_str_mv AT majunxian areviewofcrosstalkresearchforplasmonicwaveguides
AT zengdezheng areviewofcrosstalkresearchforplasmonicwaveguides
AT yangyatao areviewofcrosstalkresearchforplasmonicwaveguides
AT pancan areviewofcrosstalkresearchforplasmonicwaveguides
AT zhangli areviewofcrosstalkresearchforplasmonicwaveguides
AT xuhaidon areviewofcrosstalkresearchforplasmonicwaveguides
AT majunxian reviewofcrosstalkresearchforplasmonicwaveguides
AT zengdezheng reviewofcrosstalkresearchforplasmonicwaveguides
AT yangyatao reviewofcrosstalkresearchforplasmonicwaveguides
AT pancan reviewofcrosstalkresearchforplasmonicwaveguides
AT zhangli reviewofcrosstalkresearchforplasmonicwaveguides
AT xuhaidon reviewofcrosstalkresearchforplasmonicwaveguides
_version_ 1718439259732443136