On peer reviewing: how to nourish an author’s mind and win a JLDHE editor’s heart

Editors and publishers of scholarly journals rarely agree on what makes for a good publication; they do, however, agree on the need for a robust peer review process as a crucial means to judge the merits of potential publications. While fraught with issues and inefficiencies, a critical and support...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Eleanor Loughlin, Alicja Syska, Gita Sedghi, Christina Howell-Richardson
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Association for Learning Development in Higher Education (ALDinHE) 2020
Materias:	Theory and practice of education LB5-3640
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/cbc6f9ec066e421b98e940ca0be807b8
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:cbc6f9ec066e421b98e940ca0be807b8
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:cbc6f9ec066e421b98e940ca0be807b82021-11-29T14:02:10ZOn peer reviewing: how to nourish an author’s mind and win a JLDHE editor’s heart10.47408/jldhe.vi19.6261759-667Xhttps://doaj.org/article/cbc6f9ec066e421b98e940ca0be807b82020-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://repl.gianfj.com/index.php/jldhe/article/view/626https://doaj.org/toc/1759-667X Editors and publishers of scholarly journals rarely agree on what makes for a good publication; they do, however, agree on the need for a robust peer review process as a crucial means to judge the merits of potential publications. While fraught with issues and inefficiencies, a critical and supportive peer review is not only what editors rely on when assessing scholarship presented for publication but also what authors hope for in order to improve their work. Understanding how peer review may best serve all parties involved: authors, editors, and reviewers, is thus at the heart of this article. The analysis offered here is based on a session the Journal for Learning Development in Higher Education editors gave at the 2020 LD@3 seminar series, entitled ‘The Art of Reviewing’. It explores the different aspects of the peer review process while formulating recommendations regarding best practices and outlining JLDHE initiatives for supporting reviewers’ vital work. Eleanor LoughlinAlicja SyskaGita SedghiChristina Howell-RichardsonAssociation for Learning Development in Higher Education (ALDinHE)articleTheory and practice of educationLB5-3640ENJournal of Learning Development in Higher Education, Iss 19 (2020)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Theory and practice of education LB5-3640
spellingShingle	Theory and practice of education LB5-3640 Eleanor Loughlin Alicja Syska Gita Sedghi Christina Howell-Richardson On peer reviewing: how to nourish an author’s mind and win a JLDHE editor’s heart
description	Editors and publishers of scholarly journals rarely agree on what makes for a good publication; they do, however, agree on the need for a robust peer review process as a crucial means to judge the merits of potential publications. While fraught with issues and inefficiencies, a critical and supportive peer review is not only what editors rely on when assessing scholarship presented for publication but also what authors hope for in order to improve their work. Understanding how peer review may best serve all parties involved: authors, editors, and reviewers, is thus at the heart of this article. The analysis offered here is based on a session the Journal for Learning Development in Higher Education editors gave at the 2020 LD@3 seminar series, entitled ‘The Art of Reviewing’. It explores the different aspects of the peer review process while formulating recommendations regarding best practices and outlining JLDHE initiatives for supporting reviewers’ vital work.
format	article
author	Eleanor Loughlin Alicja Syska Gita Sedghi Christina Howell-Richardson
author_facet	Eleanor Loughlin Alicja Syska Gita Sedghi Christina Howell-Richardson
author_sort	Eleanor Loughlin
title	On peer reviewing: how to nourish an author’s mind and win a JLDHE editor’s heart
title_short	On peer reviewing: how to nourish an author’s mind and win a JLDHE editor’s heart
title_full	On peer reviewing: how to nourish an author’s mind and win a JLDHE editor’s heart
title_fullStr	On peer reviewing: how to nourish an author’s mind and win a JLDHE editor’s heart
title_full_unstemmed	On peer reviewing: how to nourish an author’s mind and win a JLDHE editor’s heart
title_sort	on peer reviewing: how to nourish an author’s mind and win a jldhe editor’s heart
publisher	Association for Learning Development in Higher Education (ALDinHE)
publishDate	2020
url	https://doaj.org/article/cbc6f9ec066e421b98e940ca0be807b8
work_keys_str_mv	AT eleanorloughlin onpeerreviewinghowtonourishanauthorsmindandwinajldheeditorsheart AT alicjasyska onpeerreviewinghowtonourishanauthorsmindandwinajldheeditorsheart AT gitasedghi onpeerreviewinghowtonourishanauthorsmindandwinajldheeditorsheart AT christinahowellrichardson onpeerreviewinghowtonourishanauthorsmindandwinajldheeditorsheart
_version_	1718407312683565056

On peer reviewing: how to nourish an author’s mind and win a JLDHE editor’s heart

Ejemplares similares