Do Older Women of Reproductive Age Have Better Diet Quality than Younger Women of Reproductive Age?

There is increasing recognition of the importance of nutrition for reproductive health, but little is known regarding the diet quality of younger vs. older reproductive aged women, and how their intakes relate to dietary recommendations. The purpose of the study was to examine the diets of younger (...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nahal Habibi, Katherine M. Livingstone, Suzanne Edwards, Jessica A. Grieger
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/cbd0891240f14fab8fe772cdcd90b3e0
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:cbd0891240f14fab8fe772cdcd90b3e0
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:cbd0891240f14fab8fe772cdcd90b3e02021-11-25T18:34:29ZDo Older Women of Reproductive Age Have Better Diet Quality than Younger Women of Reproductive Age?10.3390/nu131138302072-6643https://doaj.org/article/cbd0891240f14fab8fe772cdcd90b3e02021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/11/3830https://doaj.org/toc/2072-6643There is increasing recognition of the importance of nutrition for reproductive health, but little is known regarding the diet quality of younger vs. older reproductive aged women, and how their intakes relate to dietary recommendations. The purpose of the study was to examine the diets of younger (19–35 years old) compared to older (35–50 years old) reproductive aged women, and how they align with dietary recommendations. Women aged 19–50 years from the 2011–13 Australian National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey were included (<i>n</i> = 2323). Dietary intakes were assessed by a single 24-h dietary recall and were compared to (i) Australian Dietary Guidelines; (ii) Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution for protein, carbohydrates, and fat; and (iii) Dietary Guideline Index (DGI). Regression analyses comparing younger and older women against recommendations were undertaken, with confounders determined a priori. There was no difference between older and younger women in meeting food group recommendations, with 26% of all women meeting recommendations for fruit, and meat and alternatives, and <20% meeting recommendations for vegetables and alternatives, grains, and dairy. Although there was no difference between older and younger women in total DGI score (mean (SE) 75.6 (1.7) vs. 74.5 (2.5), <i>p</i> > 0.05), older women had higher component scores in limiting saturated fat, consuming low-fat milk, and limiting adding salt during cooking. Continued health promotion for women of reproductive age should be a key priority to improve their own health and that of future generations.Nahal HabibiKatherine M. LivingstoneSuzanne EdwardsJessica A. GriegerMDPI AGarticleAustraliadietary guidelinesdietary guideline indexdietary intakenutrientsreproductive ageNutrition. Foods and food supplyTX341-641ENNutrients, Vol 13, Iss 3830, p 3830 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Australia
dietary guidelines
dietary guideline index
dietary intake
nutrients
reproductive age
Nutrition. Foods and food supply
TX341-641
spellingShingle Australia
dietary guidelines
dietary guideline index
dietary intake
nutrients
reproductive age
Nutrition. Foods and food supply
TX341-641
Nahal Habibi
Katherine M. Livingstone
Suzanne Edwards
Jessica A. Grieger
Do Older Women of Reproductive Age Have Better Diet Quality than Younger Women of Reproductive Age?
description There is increasing recognition of the importance of nutrition for reproductive health, but little is known regarding the diet quality of younger vs. older reproductive aged women, and how their intakes relate to dietary recommendations. The purpose of the study was to examine the diets of younger (19–35 years old) compared to older (35–50 years old) reproductive aged women, and how they align with dietary recommendations. Women aged 19–50 years from the 2011–13 Australian National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey were included (<i>n</i> = 2323). Dietary intakes were assessed by a single 24-h dietary recall and were compared to (i) Australian Dietary Guidelines; (ii) Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution for protein, carbohydrates, and fat; and (iii) Dietary Guideline Index (DGI). Regression analyses comparing younger and older women against recommendations were undertaken, with confounders determined a priori. There was no difference between older and younger women in meeting food group recommendations, with 26% of all women meeting recommendations for fruit, and meat and alternatives, and <20% meeting recommendations for vegetables and alternatives, grains, and dairy. Although there was no difference between older and younger women in total DGI score (mean (SE) 75.6 (1.7) vs. 74.5 (2.5), <i>p</i> > 0.05), older women had higher component scores in limiting saturated fat, consuming low-fat milk, and limiting adding salt during cooking. Continued health promotion for women of reproductive age should be a key priority to improve their own health and that of future generations.
format article
author Nahal Habibi
Katherine M. Livingstone
Suzanne Edwards
Jessica A. Grieger
author_facet Nahal Habibi
Katherine M. Livingstone
Suzanne Edwards
Jessica A. Grieger
author_sort Nahal Habibi
title Do Older Women of Reproductive Age Have Better Diet Quality than Younger Women of Reproductive Age?
title_short Do Older Women of Reproductive Age Have Better Diet Quality than Younger Women of Reproductive Age?
title_full Do Older Women of Reproductive Age Have Better Diet Quality than Younger Women of Reproductive Age?
title_fullStr Do Older Women of Reproductive Age Have Better Diet Quality than Younger Women of Reproductive Age?
title_full_unstemmed Do Older Women of Reproductive Age Have Better Diet Quality than Younger Women of Reproductive Age?
title_sort do older women of reproductive age have better diet quality than younger women of reproductive age?
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/cbd0891240f14fab8fe772cdcd90b3e0
work_keys_str_mv AT nahalhabibi doolderwomenofreproductiveagehavebetterdietqualitythanyoungerwomenofreproductiveage
AT katherinemlivingstone doolderwomenofreproductiveagehavebetterdietqualitythanyoungerwomenofreproductiveage
AT suzanneedwards doolderwomenofreproductiveagehavebetterdietqualitythanyoungerwomenofreproductiveage
AT jessicaagrieger doolderwomenofreproductiveagehavebetterdietqualitythanyoungerwomenofreproductiveage
_version_ 1718410978692956160