REVIEW: Quandry over contrasting ethics texts
Review of Journalism Ethics: Arguments and Cases, by Martin Hirst and Roger Patching "I have sought advice from both texts on this kind of delimma: journalists allowing personal allegiances to influence them in the course of their duty. Richard points to the flaws in Australian MEAA Code of E...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Asia Pacific Network
2005
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/cbdc700a92c2430794a65d9b6c9b5fb9 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:cbdc700a92c2430794a65d9b6c9b5fb9 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:cbdc700a92c2430794a65d9b6c9b5fb92021-12-02T13:14:40ZREVIEW: Quandry over contrasting ethics texts10.24135/pjr.v11i2.10631023-94992324-2035https://doaj.org/article/cbdc700a92c2430794a65d9b6c9b5fb92005-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/1063https://doaj.org/toc/1023-9499https://doaj.org/toc/2324-2035 Review of Journalism Ethics: Arguments and Cases, by Martin Hirst and Roger Patching "I have sought advice from both texts on this kind of delimma: journalists allowing personal allegiances to influence them in the course of their duty. Richard points to the flaws in Australian MEAA Code of Ethics' clause 4 which stipulates journalists should not allow 'personal interest or any belief, commitment, payment, gift or benefit; to undermine their accuracy, fairness or independence..Hirst and Patching make much of an 'ethical fault line' metaphore throughout their text and refer to objectvity as 'one of the most volatile fault lines in the ideology of reports..." Mark PearsonAsia Pacific Networkarticlejournalism ethicsobjectivitymedia code of ethicsjournalism principlesethical faultsreviewsCommunication. Mass mediaP87-96Journalism. The periodical press, etc.PN4699-5650ENPacific Journalism Review, Vol 11, Iss 2 (2005) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
EN |
| topic |
journalism ethics objectivity media code of ethics journalism principles ethical faults reviews Communication. Mass media P87-96 Journalism. The periodical press, etc. PN4699-5650 |
| spellingShingle |
journalism ethics objectivity media code of ethics journalism principles ethical faults reviews Communication. Mass media P87-96 Journalism. The periodical press, etc. PN4699-5650 Mark Pearson REVIEW: Quandry over contrasting ethics texts |
| description |
Review of Journalism Ethics: Arguments and Cases, by Martin Hirst and Roger Patching
"I have sought advice from both texts on this kind of delimma: journalists allowing personal allegiances to influence them in the course of their duty. Richard points to the flaws in Australian MEAA Code of Ethics' clause 4 which stipulates journalists should not allow 'personal interest or any belief, commitment, payment, gift or benefit; to undermine their accuracy, fairness or independence..Hirst and Patching make much of an 'ethical fault line' metaphore throughout their text and refer to objectvity as 'one of the most volatile fault lines in the ideology of reports..."
|
| format |
article |
| author |
Mark Pearson |
| author_facet |
Mark Pearson |
| author_sort |
Mark Pearson |
| title |
REVIEW: Quandry over contrasting ethics texts |
| title_short |
REVIEW: Quandry over contrasting ethics texts |
| title_full |
REVIEW: Quandry over contrasting ethics texts |
| title_fullStr |
REVIEW: Quandry over contrasting ethics texts |
| title_full_unstemmed |
REVIEW: Quandry over contrasting ethics texts |
| title_sort |
review: quandry over contrasting ethics texts |
| publisher |
Asia Pacific Network |
| publishDate |
2005 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/cbdc700a92c2430794a65d9b6c9b5fb9 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT markpearson reviewquandryovercontrastingethicstexts |
| _version_ |
1718393413841190912 |